Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, MooneyMitch said:

Oceano Airport L52 is 2315 feet.

 

So far you're in the lead with shortest runway.

My home airport is 4,037 feet. I assume the last 37 feet is so it is eligible for a GPS approach which we just recently got. I do 80 over the fence if I'm lazy, but sometimes I'll try 75 and it makes it easier to plant the plane on my aimpoint.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Raptor05121 said:

So far you're in the lead with shortest runway.

My home airport is 4,037 feet. I assume the last 37 feet is so it is eligible for a GPS approach which we just recently got. I do 80 over the fence if I'm lazy, but sometimes I'll try 75 and it makes it easier to plant the plane on my aimpoint.

80 won't work for places like these!

http://www.airnav.com/airport/MD42

http://www.airnav.com/airport/2W2

Posted

Does it have to be in a Mooney? If not, my old home base in CT was 1800'. Mostly fixed gear Cessnas but I did fly an Arrow there once. Short field set up, whatever you flew. 

OTOH, the shortest runway at my next home base was 4800' which felt pretty short since the MSL altitude was 5885'. Flew an M20C out of there.

Posted

Due to displaced thresholds at both ends, my airport (Y47) is 2264 x 40 landing west and a whopping 1862 landing east.  And the surface is crappy, too.

70 miles per hour on short final, full flaps, retract the flaps to get better braking shortly after touchdown.

When I'm by myself I'm doing closer to 65 MPH on short final as I cross the airport boundary.

But that's nothing for an M20C.  A friend used to fly his Ovation 3 out of my airport.

  • Like 3
Posted

CYNJ - most often use 01/19 which is 2100' long.
80mph on final - maybe 75 over the fence - I don't often look at that point!
Field is 34' ASL

Dave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

 

I am CYYJ 7000' and two crosswinds at about 5000'.  61' ASL.

70-80kts over the fence and I am clear of active before the half way mark.

8 hours ago, 170driver said:

CYNJ - most often use 01/19 which is 2100' long.
80mph on final - maybe 75 over the fence - I don't often look at that point!
Field is 34' ASL

Dave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Funny I was just wondering about operations out of Langley as I need to do some work in the area. Glad to see another wet coast canuck on the board,

Posted

03/21 at KPLR is 5001' X 80'. Land 03 75-80 kts over the fence and 70 kts landing 21. Hangar is towards the north end of the field.

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎22‎/‎2017 at 11:42 AM, Hank said:

I've moved from 3000' obstructed at both ends, 567 msl, to 3200' mostly open but far from level at 326 msl.

20161210_121312.thumb.jpg.cb46b7b821521ea17b0d26a6181d0810.jpg

70-75 mph works well on short final. Landing on 31, if I'm on speed, hardly need brakes to make the turnoff to the hangar. 

Hank, If there continues to be that much activity you guys will need a tower at the field. :) 

  • Like 1
Posted
 
I am CYYJ 7000' and two crosswinds at about 5000'.  61' ASL.
70-80kts over the fence and I am clear of active before the half way mark.
 
Funny I was just wondering about operations out of Langley as I need to do some work in the area. Glad to see another wet coast canuck on the board,

I haven't tried departing at gross on a hot day - would opt for 07/25 at 2700'. Did t/o from Okotoks at gross on a 29 deg day a couple of years ago. 3500' rwy and wheels were off a little past the halfway point, so wouldn't try it with 2100'.

Dave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
8 hours ago, 1964-M20E said:

O   O   O   O   

Does landing on a helicopter dolly count?  In that case 20' and 6"AGL:D:o

Come in steep 70mph parking brake set hit the dolly dead center and see how far it rolls

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, TWinter said:

Hank, If there continues to be that much activity you guys will need a tower at the field. :) 

A plane is being rehabbed now, so traffic should soon double!  :P  (Hey, two planes should generate twice the traffic of one, right?)

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Hank said:

A plane is being rehabbed now, so traffic should soon double!  :P  (Hey, two planes should generate twice the traffic of one, right?)

So right now it a Mooney's only exclusive airport?

 

Posted

At my home field landing on 08, making the intersection in my Mooneys was easy, as are the RV4 and 400.

Clarence

image.jpg

Posted
47 minutes ago, Hank said:

A plane is being rehabbed now, so traffic should soon double!  :P  (Hey, two planes should generate twice the traffic of one, right?)

Hank, which hangar is yours? :lol:

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Aerial photo of KGSO (Piedmont Triad International Airport)

KGSO is where my Mooney F model lives..... 3 runways

10,001 foot runway

9,000 foot runway

6,380 foot runway

Taking off I am at pattern altitude with runway still under me, kind of comforting in a way. Control tower with radar also

Edited by Mooney_Mike
Posted

In all these discussions of Mooneys that can land in very short distances, it is interesting to note that for LAHSO operations, the FAA does not think Mooneys can stop very well.

While many (most?) common GA aircraft are considered group 1, or 2, the FAA puts all M-20's into group 4.....requiring 4000', or more for LAHSO operations.  The notable exception:  The M-18 Mite is group 1:  2500'.

https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/7110.118.pdf

Posted
4 hours ago, Mooneymite said:

In all these discussions of Mooneys that can land in very short distances, it is interesting to note that for LAHSO operations, the FAA does not think Mooneys can stop very well.

While many (most?) common GA aircraft are considered group 1, or 2, the FAA puts all M-20's into group 4.....requiring 4000', or more for LAHSO operations.  The notable exception:  The M-18 Mite is group 1:  2500'.

https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/7110.118.pdf

Yep, there we are in Group 4 along with the Cessna 170 and the Turbo Meridian. Wonder what makes moving the nose wheel to the tail push the 170 so much further along than the 172? Apparently Mooneys flown by superior pilots (as are often found here!  :lol: )  are in the minority among all Mooneys in the GA fleet.

But then again, this is government, so it does not have to make sense.

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Hank said:

Yep, there we are in Group 4 along with the Cessna 170 and the Turbo Meridian. Wonder what makes moving the nose wheel to the tail push the 170 so much further along than the 172? Apparently Mooneys flown by superior pilots (as are often found here!  :lol: )  are in the minority among all Mooneys in the GA fleet.

But then again, this is government, so it does not have to make sense.

 

I personally find the mooney brakes to be mostly garbage, but ours is a heavy pig.

Posted

It's interesting that the same Cleavland brake hardware installed on different makes of aircraft in similar weight catagories so often get maligned in one application yet praised in another. I theorize that most Mooney braking issues come from pilots trying to use brakes to slow an airplane with very little of it's weight on the wheels. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.