Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, RobertGary1 said:

some place that doesn't add $100 for California taxes.

You can run but you can't hide.  If you figure out how to hide, please share the secret.  

Posted

Honestly (and I'm not sure what taxes you'd pay), Spruce has the best pricing I've seen.  I can't even get close to this with my Aviall account, so I'm relegated to Spruce until someone comes along and beats their pricing.

image.png.15a19762cb5440c0bfa8fd8816cf767b.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, StevenL757 said:

Honestly (and I'm not sure what taxes you'd pay), Spruce has the best pricing I've seen.  I can't even get close to this with my Aviall account, so I'm relagated to Spruce until someone comes along and beats their pricing.

image.png.15a19762cb5440c0bfa8fd8816cf767b.png

They charge tax. So does chief. Maybe I’ll check with Maxwell. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, RobertGary1 said:

They charge tax. So does chief. Maybe I’ll check with Maxwell. 

My tax rate is only 4%, and for over $250 purchased, they ship free.  So essentially about 68 bucks tax.

Posted

Spruce is going to charge tax on where they ship it.

If you have a friend where they can ship it to in Oregon (no tax), they would have to turn around and ship it to you - by the time you pay the shipping from OR-CA you still might save a few dollars.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, LANCECASPER said:

Spruce is going to charge tax on where they ship it.

If you have a friend where they can ship it to in Oregon (no tax), they would have to turn around and ship it to you - by the time you pay the shipping from OR-CA you still might save a few dollars.

Same with with Fl. so long ad the tail number you give them is registered in Fl

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Long live the hydraulic oleo strut! About $50.00 in materials and the same amount of labour.  Lord Corporation sure praises their stuff highly.

Posted
57 minutes ago, M20Doc said:

Long live the hydraulic oleo strut! About $50.00 in materials and the same amount of labour.  Lord Corporation sure praises their stuff highly.

Softer touchdowns, too.

The Mooney landing gear is not a terrific design: Too many wear parts in the steering linkage lead to sloppy nosewheel steering; restricted turn radius and no, or insufficient, stops (depending on the model) make the nose gear susceptible to towing damage; stiff shock disks that are overloaded in long bodies and thus need frequent replacement; a main gear design that coupled with the aft placement of the spar in the laminar flow wing puts the main wheels fairly far aft making the airplane nose heavy; an emergency gear extension mechanism that only protects against electrical or motor failures; and a retraction actuator that includes an unobtanium life-limited spring. But, other than that, it's a wonderful design.

Skip

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
3 hours ago, PT20J said:

Softer touchdowns, too.

The Mooney landing gear is not a terrific design: Too many wear parts in the steering linkage lead to sloppy nosewheel steering; restricted turn radius and no, or insufficient, stops (depending on the model) make the nose gear susceptible to towing damage; stiff shock disks that are overloaded in long bodies and thus need frequent replacement; a main gear design that coupled with the aft placement of the spar in the laminar flow wing puts the main wheels fairly far aft making the airplane nose heavy; an emergency gear extension mechanism that only protects against electrical or motor failures; and a retraction actuator that includes an unobtanium life-limited spring. But, other than that, it's a wonderful design.

Skip

Hang on now, this a Mooney forum where we can’t speak ill of our Mooneys!

Posted

Wait - have I been gone so long that I don’t know of some fix to the dreaded rubber donut design? Do mid bodies have an upgrade ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
8 hours ago, bluehighwayflyer said:

Personally I think Al’s original mechanical gear, in particular, was quite elegant and ingenious in it’s design. Having previously owned a Cherokee 180, if I had wanted an Arrow or a Comanche I would have bought one.  

I agree, the design is good, but you can’t overlook its limitations now.  Skip points out a number of them above.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.