Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Haha, it wouldn't need the step anymore. I'm sure it would work. Even closer to the P51. The tail wheel would need to be forward a bit. It would be lighter w/o all the steel in the nose. 

Fun,

-Matt

Posted
13 minutes ago, Marauder said:

Already been done. It's called a Swift. emoji57.png

dbd4eb06cbdf3ef4463b560300262f91.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Heard one of those talking to Atlanta Approach last weekend. The controller didn't know what it was, had to ask for his type. Twice!  :D  Cool planes, imtink.

  • Like 2
Posted

Not sure the all moving tail design of a Mooney lends itself well for a tail wheel. Might have to sharpen the pencil to see how landing loads would affect the tail attach structure.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
On 12/9/2015 at 6:31 PM, Marauder said:

Already been done. It's called a Swift. emoji57.png

dbd4eb06cbdf3ef4463b560300262f91.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ahhhhhh Marauder beat me to it.  There is a real pretty polished aluminum one at my airfield.  I like the big open window that you can stick your elbow out of!

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Hector said:

Not sure the all moving tail design of a Mooney lends itself well for a tail wheel. Might have to sharpen the pencil to see how landing loads would affect the tail attach structure.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well I do have the tail wheel back a little far.  It would have to attached in front of the movable tail. :D  Like I said I'm just playing but there is a J model with the rocket conversion that is disassembled would make a good candidate.  I wonder if this would be enough of a modification to firmly put the resulting plane in the experimental category without the limited testing restrictions. Maybe an all composite fuselage and a second door.

 

Yes I do like the Swift it is a pretty plane.

 

 

 

 

Posted

When I lived in CO (01V) there was a guy who put a 250 HP engine in his Swift. He took me up one day and we did some aerobatics. That thing would go straight up for over two thousand feet. Kind of like a 250 HP retractable Cessna 150.

Posted

I don't know much...  

The landing gear of the tail dragger vs. nose dragger moved from...

behind the center of lift (nose wheel)

-to-

forward of the center of lift (tail wheel)

something to consider in your re-design ideas...

Seems to be an important CG issue during the transition from flight to ground bound vehicle.

Best regards,

-a-

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.