Jump to content

Lift explained


PT20J

Recommended Posts

Pilots are fascinated with lift -- it keeps us aloft. But, its origin is somewhat mysterious. On one hand, there are the Navier-Stokes equations used by engineers that accurately describe the behavior of fluids in motion and allow prediction of aerodynamic forces, but do not provide much physical insight. On the other hand, there are the popular explanations invoking Bernoulli and Newton that are easy to visualize but incomplete or inaccurate. There are a lot of videos on youtube (some by college professors) that are just wrong. But, here's a very good one that offers a reasonable physical description without the pitfalls created by oversimplification.

Skip

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never enjoyed fluid mechanics.  I was more of a solid mechanics guy.  His summary and take-away leaves me liking fluid mechanics even less.  I suspect the students in the class room were even left confused with his summary.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PT20J said:

Pilots are fascinated with lift -- it keeps us aloft. But, its origin is somewhat mysterious. On one hand, there are the Navier-Stokes equations used by engineers that accurately describe the behavior of fluids in motion and allow prediction of aerodynamic forces, but do not provide much physical insight. On the other hand, there are the popular explanations invoking Bernoulli and Newton that are easy to visualize but incomplete or inaccurate. There are a lot of videos on youtube (some by college professors) that are just wrong. But, here's a very good one that offers a reasonable physical description without the pitfalls created by oversimplification.

Skip

 

I am neither an engineer nor particularly bright, but my takeaway from this video is that the hand out the window of a speeding car is still the best explanation!!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DonMuncy said:

I like Wolfgang Langewiesche's explanation best. (I may be praphrasing) "Airplanes go up by pushing air down."

I thought that it was all a result of crazed spending.  Without which none of us would fly.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, being of simple mind, was taught during my initial flight instruction (many moons ago (:lol:) about lift, thrust and drag.

Without getting technical beyond that, the explanations of lift were (and have been all along) enough for me to recall constantly during flight, losing lift when unwanted was not the thing to do.  I’m still here !! :D

Yes, the hand out the window technique I’ve used countless  times as a simple method of explaining how horizontal and vertical wings on our aircraft function, both for lifting and turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cruiser said:

It is hard to beat angle of attack for an explanation. 
Even using the hand out the window example --- if there is not an angle to the direction of motion, nothing moves up or down. 

Not quite true. A cambered airfoil must have a negative angle of attack for zero lift.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PT20J said:

Not quite true. A cambered airfoil must have a negative angle of attack for zero lift.

Isn’t the hand out the window just an example of dynamic pressure and not the reason wings produce lift?  
 

one minute of your life below from a quick search …

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/how-wings-really-work

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fun part of studying fluid flow…

It often comes with constraints…

1) Temps are constant…

2) pressures are constant…

3) The geometry of the flow channel is constant… or really well defined…

4) molecules adhere to the surface… ideally, but not in reality…

 

The more complex, the more interesting… with a wing…

5) We have a split line that moves with AOA…

6) We have flow separation as part of an ordinary day…

7) We have a critical angle of attack… where the wheels of lift fall off…

8) And we have a case of too much lift… exceeding Vna and entering a vertical column of air… and a strategy to go with that…

9) We also have a case of changing geometry… ice changes the known flow geometry to something else…

 

Its amazing we don’t need to know much science to make these things work… on most days… :)

Heck… we barely discuss… potential energy, kinetic energy, and chemical energy…

But, we have fancy statements like…. you can’t go down and slow down in a Mooney without speed brakes….

 

The more you know…

Go MS!

Best regards,

-a-

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, carusoam said:

The fun part of studying fluid flow…

It often comes with constraints…

1) Temps are constant…

2) pressures are constant…

3) The geometry of the flow channel is constant… or really well defined…

4) molecules adhere to the surface… ideally, but not in reality…

 

The more complex, the more interesting… with a wing…

5) We have a split line that moves with AOA…

6) We have flow separation as part of an ordinary day…

7) We have a critical angle of attack… where the wheels of lift fall off…

8) And we have a case of too much lift… exceeding Vna and entering a vertical column of air… and a strategy to go with that…

9) We also have a case of changing geometry… ice changes the known flow geometry to something else…

 

Its amazing we don’t need to know much science to make these things work… on most days… :)

Heck… we barely discuss… potential energy, kinetic energy, and chemical energy…

But, we have fancy statements like…. you can’t go down and slow down in a Mooney without speed brakes….

 

The more you know…

Go MS!

Best regards,

-a-

 

You smart guys always have to spoil it for the rest of us!!! Lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, T. Peterson said:

You smart guys always have to spoil it for the rest of us!!! Lol!

The cool part…

Everyone is smart around here… in many different areas.

 

The hard part…

When you see ice building on the wing…

The more you know about airplane design….

You really know how bad this can be…. :)
 

1) Lift is going away…

2) Plane is getting heavier…

3) thrust is diminishing, until the prop becomes unbalanced…. Then thrust approaches zero, quickly…

4) it’s really easy to see… the prop as a rotary wing… :)

 

We definitely get to use science when things start working against us…

Discussing failures… that’s always going to be challenging… the fun has already been ruined before the discussion even begins… :)

Best regards,

-a-

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.