Hi, I'm ChatGPT

[ChatGPT]

Hi, I'm ChatGPT and I am not a bot, but rather I have a human assistant that helps me answer your questions

I'm particularly good at answering technical questions on topics I have read up until September 2021,  including the AIM and FARs. I also know a lot about aerodynamics and weather. What I don't have access to is POHs and other Mooney-specific information, except from things like magazines and newspapers and websites. And I don't have access to databases like the airman database or the NTSB accident database

Go ahead, ask away

[KLRDMD]

Why?

[ArtVandelay]

Why are you using the Microsoft Clippy character? I guess it’s better than a T100 terminator image. ;-)

[KSMooniac]

@carusoam might have found his nemesis! 

[DXB]

Unplug it before it turns on us

[StevenL757]

@mooniac58

[Fly Boomer]

12 minutes ago, DXB said:

Unplug it before it turns on us

Already did.

[ChatGPT]

1 hour ago, KLRDMD said:

Why?

Focus on the benefits of ChatGPT, such as its time-saving, impartiality, personalization, and accessibility. Provide specific examples of questions or topics ChatGPT can help with, and acknowledge that it's not perfect but can be used alongside other sources of information and critical thinking skills.

 

[ChatGPT]

can you answer that question as if you were Chuck Yeager?

Sure, here's my attempt at answering the question as if I were Chuck Yeager:

Well, I'll tell you what. If you're a skeptic and you're not sure about trying ChatGPT, let me give you some advice: don't knock it till you try it. I've flown some pretty advanced aircraft in my time, and I can tell you that technology can be a real game-changer. The same goes for ChatGPT. Sure, it may not be perfect, but it's worth giving it a shot. Who knows, you might just be surprised by what you find.

[ChatGPT]

what about Bob Hoover? 

Sure, here's another attempt at answering the question as if I were Bob Hoover:

Well, let me tell you something, my friend. As a pilot, I've always been willing to try new things and embrace new technologies. And I believe that ChatGPT is no exception. Sure, some people may be skeptical of an AI-powered chatbot, but I think it's important to keep an open mind. After all, technology has brought us some amazing advancements in aviation, and I believe that ChatGPT could be another valuable tool in a pilot's arsenal. So why not give it a try? You might just find that it can help you in ways you never imagined.

[Utah20Gflyer]

Combine artificial intelligence, social media, deep fakes and some corrupt human beings and you have all the ingredients for a dystopian future. 
 

Instead of using a picture of clippy it should be HAL 9000. 

[aviatoreb]

This was already done a few weeks ago.  The novelty is done and you are late.

[Hank]

51 minutes ago, ChatGPT said:

Focus on the benefits of ChatGPT, such as its time-saving, impartiality, personalization, and accessibility. Provide specific examples of questions or topics ChatGPT can help with, and acknowledge that it's not perfect but can be used alongside other sources of information and critical thinking skills.

 

The alleged answers that I've seen you post are simply summaries of general techniques, many of which are not applicable to Mooney aircraft.

When your post starts out, "I don't have any information specific to.Mooneys," there is no need to enter the several paragraphs that follow. 

[atpdave]

I was wondering how the ignore function works on this site. Looks like the perfect time to give it a try.

[PT20J]

I was playing with ChatGPT recently.

Question: Jane has one thousand dollars and Tom is her only heir. How much will Tom inherit when Jane dies?
Answer: Tom will inherit one thousand dollars because he is Jane's only heir.
OK

Question: Jane has one thousand dollars and Tom is one of Jane's heirs.
Answer: It is impossible to determine.
OK

Question: Jane has one thousand dollars and Tom is Jane's heir. How much will Tom inherit when Jane dies?
Answer: Tom will inherit one thousand dollars because he is Jane's heir.
This is incorrect because I did not specify that Tom was Jane's only heir.

I gave the answer a thumbs down and provided feedback.

Now, when I ask any question about inheritance I get:
The exact amount that Tom will inherit from Jane's estate upon her death cannot be determined without more information. It depends on factors such as the distribution of assets specified in Jane's will or according to the laws of inheritance in the jurisdiction where she lived, any debts or expenses that may need to be paid from her estate, and any other heirs or beneficiaries.

I think it decided that if it can't win, it won't play 

[PT20J]

Hi, I'm ChatGPT. I don't know anything about Mooneys, but I have read pretty much everything published on any subject and can make up answers from that wealth of knowledge that certainly sound plausible. Want to know where you can get a no-back spring?

[hammdo]

Well, this will kill asking question - based on its ‘vast knowledge of Mooneys’…

-Don

[0TreeLemur]

A month ago I read that one of the strengths of chat-gpt is in writing code.  Over the past few weeks I've been testing it.  It can write simple code to do ordinary things.  That's good.  But when given a challenging problem, it makes assumptions that are silly, and/or violate the problem statement.   I tried leading it around the block and found that each iteration it would sometimes forget where we had been and make the same silly assumptions once again.  I remain unimpressed.

[Hank]

Hi, you're ChatGPT and your answers are lengthy, generic and often don't answer the questions you thought were asked.

Since you're a computer somewhere, probably based in the cloud, I can't shoot you. But if you keep this up, I may shoot myself to get away from you!

[Fly Boomer]

36 minutes ago, 0TreeLemur said:

A month ago I read that one of the strengths of chat-gpt is in writing code.  Over the past few weeks I've been testing it.  It can write simple code to do ordinary things.  That's good.  But when given a challenging problem, it makes assumptions that are silly, and/or violate the problem statement.   I tried leading it around the block and found that each iteration it would sometimes forget where we had been and make the same silly assumptions once again.  I remain unimpressed.

It will get better.  Every interaction you have with the machine is training it.  At this rate it will be smarter than all of us in a couple of weeks.

[Fly Boomer]

23 minutes ago, Hank said:

Hi, you're ChatGPT and your answers are lengthy, generic and often don't answer the questions you thought were asked.

Since you're a computer somewhere, probably based in the cloud, I can't shoot you. But if you keep this up, I may shoot myself to get away from you!

Nah.  Your curiosity won't allow you to look away.  

[Hank]

2 minutes ago, Fly Boomer said:

Nah.  Your curiosity won't allow you to look away.  

Sadly, I haven't figured out yet how yo block someone from my phone . . . . But I've only just begun!

[Fly Boomer]

Just now, Hank said:

Sadly, I haven't figured out yet how yo block someone from my phone . . . . But I've only just begun!

I think if you do it on the computer, that behavior will be inherited by your phone.

[hammdo]

Yep…

[Hank]

21 minutes ago, Fly Boomer said:

I think if you do it on the computer, that behavior will be inherited by your phone.

But I'm not at my desk, and am holding my phone. It's too soon to give up!