Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My installer is giving me the option of having C or F for temps. 

This is going in a 1964c. My current Garwin system that came with the plane is in F. 

Is there really a choice I have?

Is there a preference of C or F if the data is sent out to a third party for analysis?

thank you in advance  

 

 

Posted

Anyone you send it to would be able to convert it at their leisure, but when you are looking at it in the plane, what makes the most sense to you? Are you looking to keep your CHT's under 400F or under 204.4C? Oil temp of 190F or 87.8C?

Pilot's choice.

Posted

Unless your POH limitation are given in both C and F, they shouldn't be giving you a choice. But everyone uses F in the US. (Mooney does provide different markings for export with a different POH)

 

That said, I do work with all units at SavvyAviation because we have clients all over the world. It's a bit of a hassle since all specs originated in the US in F and Gallons (and pounds). But the one exception is OAT where most of us prefer C since it's the temp relative to freezing that we care about. Plus chance of icing is better represented in C. JPI makes it easy to use whatever you want for OAT without effecting EGT/CHT/TIT Etc

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.