ArtVandelay Posted January 21, 2019 Report Posted January 21, 2019 I don't think so. Send me an email and I will include it in the addendum. Short answer is that so few understand what it is that there will not be a great 'Oohhh;' factor that will lead to extra value. There are a handful of upgrades that are the same. Add some marketing pizzaz but they don't bump the marketable value of the plane. I guess LED lights are in this same category?Tom Quote
jgarrison Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Posted January 21, 2019 19 minutes ago, orionflt said: I have seen appraisals that haves been all over the place, makes me wonder what standards they are actually using. Looking thru your guide you seemed to have nailed the values for the Pre 201 Mooney's. BINGO!!! My point from the start. The are not using a market based approach to arrive at value. Because they don't have market data with which to use. There were a few a while back that questioned my knowledge of values in the market and basically said that my sample size was too small to be meaningful. I'm no perfect. No, not by any stretch of the imagination. But when my ass is on the line to figure out what a plane will sell for (either by advise to a seller on brokerage or by what I am willing to invest in a plane to make a return), you can be sure that I have done my research on the value. And the process I use is laid out in the guide. The whole Aircraft Guide and Aircraft Appraisal business is all over the place with respect to values. And the sad part is that many thousand dollar decisions are being made based on inaccurate and sometimes just ridiculously wrong info. Quote
jgarrison Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Posted January 21, 2019 29 minutes ago, ArtVandelay said: I guess LED lights are in this same category? Tom Its in the guide. There is some value I assign to LEDs Quote
mike_elliott Posted January 21, 2019 Report Posted January 21, 2019 13 hours ago, jetdriven said: J. Michael Lea. Lone star jet. FWIW I think his valuation is fantasy. His website says he uses NAAA values, however they are out of business. So I think he just plugs numbers into Vref, but you can do for free. Appraisal just has 90,000 with radios and 60,000 without. Where are you going to find a 100 our factory engine J model with new paint for 60,000? http://www.mikelea.com/appraisals.htm This begs the question, Byron. Why did you have it appraised? Quote
Marauder Posted January 21, 2019 Report Posted January 21, 2019 Its in the guide. There is some value I assign to LEDs Jimmy - I know it’s is difficult to capture everything that can be added to a Mooney. There are several avionics that you may want to add. Like the GNC 255 and GTR 225 series of Garmin radios. A number of us have added those to replace aging standard Nav Coms. As well, I know like my plane, people have added the L-3 ESI-500 to back up Aspens and the G500s. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro Quote
Marauder Posted January 21, 2019 Report Posted January 21, 2019 Jimmy - just want to add that I think you are doing a great service to those of us who have invested in our planes. None of us expect to get back out what we put in, but when I hear things like, “it’s an F, it is not worth more than $50k”, it makes me foam at the mouth. Is this a panel of a $50k Mooney? You can’t buy a new F and if you could, do you think you could buy it for $50k with new paint, new interior and modern avionics? And a newer Mooney doesn’t mean it should cost more. There is a 90 J that frequents my airport. The owner obviously flies it regularly. The original paint is weathered, glass is scratched and the avionics, with the exception of the GNC 430, are all 1990 original. It’s a combination of condition & equipment, not the year that should be the cornerstone of value. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro 3 Quote
jgarrison Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Posted January 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Marauder said: It’s a combination of condition & equipment, not the year that should be the cornerstone of value. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro I certainly agree. Other than fighting Bluebook, Vref, Lenders, pre-programmed buyers, mechanics and about 60 years of history in aircraft valuation that take year/model into account as the first line of setting values, you are 100% right. And the result is that you fight a losing battle when trying to get real value out of a plane that is so far from the average like yours is. I would be proud to own a plane like yours. And as a buyer and given a fixed budget, I would certainly weigh your plane against much later, lesser equipped models. However, if I am not a cash buyer, I may have to toss your plane out of the mix due to not being able to finance it. You may remember that was the trigger to my madness of starting this project. 1 Quote
jetdriven Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 9 hours ago, mike_elliott said: This begs the question, Byron. Why did you have it appraised? To buy our 33% partner out, fairly. Quote
mike_elliott Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 8 hours ago, jetdriven said: To buy our 33% partner out, fairly. "fair" enough. I have heard of a method that works well given the right conditions, is one partner comes up with the number and the other can either buy or sell at it. Quote
thinwing Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 On 1/20/2019 at 7:15 PM, jetdriven said: J. Michael Lea. Lone star jet. FWIW I think his valuation is fantasy. His website says he uses NAAA values, however they are out of business. So I think he just plugs numbers into Vref, but you can do for free. Appraisal just has 90,000 with radios and 60,000 without. Where are you going to find a 100 our factory engine J model with new paint for 60,000? http://www.mikelea.com/appraisals.htm Apparently he thinks from yoU Quote
thinwing Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 20 hours ago, jetdriven said: To buy our 33% partner out, fairly. You are to be commended Quote
J0nathan225 Posted January 25, 2019 Report Posted January 25, 2019 Shot you an email, but to double tap: Jon Davis N5612Q j0nathan225@hotmail.com Might sell one day. Quote
Sam Harris Posted October 11, 2021 Report Posted October 11, 2021 Hi Jimmy, I’m looking at buying an A model this week (1960) and some price guidance would help. So I’d be very interested in seeing your guide. Thank you very much. Sam Quote
carusoam Posted October 11, 2021 Report Posted October 11, 2021 26 minutes ago, Sam Harris said: Hi Jimmy, I’m looking at buying an A model this week (1960) and some price guidance would help. So I’d be very interested in seeing your guide. Thank you very much. Sam let’s invite @jgarrisonto stop by… That would be really interesting if Jimmy’s guidance goes back that far… Much of the accurate pricing guidance comes from actual market data… Nobody has more accurate data than JimmyG… But, M20A market data may be pretty hard to come by… based on the small market size… Only one way to find out… ask. Best regards, -a- Quote
thinwing Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 i notice he started doing this a couple years ago...I wonder if he has had a chance to upgrade his list for 2021? Quote
Jcmtl Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 1 hour ago, thinwing said: i notice he started doing this a couple years ago...I wonder if he has had a chance to upgrade his list for 2021? I'd like to see an updated guide as well. Quote
RoundTwo Posted October 16, 2021 Report Posted October 16, 2021 15 hours ago, thinwing said: i notice he started doing this a couple years ago...I wonder if he has had a chance to upgrade his list for 2021? I spoke to Jimmy this week on this very topic. He did not do the valuation for J and beyond. Quote
M20F-1968 Posted October 24, 2021 Report Posted October 24, 2021 Jimmy, I would like to add support to Marauder's comments and some data from my plane that is off the charts. I have a 1968 F which is completely rebuilt from an empty shell. It is a unique plane. It came into being when I purchased it after it sat for 26 years in a hangar in Dallas. After its rebuild, it has been appraised by a certified appraiser on Long Island, NY at $250,000.00 and is presently insured for that much. When I started the project I was two years out of residency (I am an M.D.), was working too much, and could not afford the distraction and time needed to travel and be an informed bidder in the market. When I found this plane on e-bay, I sent Russell Stallings to take it apart more than it already was and report if it was a good project plane. He supported my idea to rebuild it. The end result is an airplane that looks and acts like a new Mooney. It has long legs (90 gallons), is turbo normalized, the structural cage has been modified to accept an Ovation style panel (with an instrument bow), most if not all 201 upgrades and many parts installed via DER approval from a 1998 Ovation. It has won a Lindy Award (best of show in class) at Oshkosh 2019, Outstanding Mooney at Oshkosh in 2018, and Best F model at the 2017 MAPA meeting. I would obviously like to see the envelope expanded to recognize the work, money and effort that those of us have made to keep these efficient vintage birds flying. I was able to find insurers that recognized that a completely rebuilt airplane is one of a kind and its value is not dictated by Book Value. It is this notion that has given rise to Mooney modifications over the past 30 years. Now that the factory is no longer building new planes, restoration of the existing fleet makes sense, especially if it can be done competently and within an expected predictable budget. There has been a lot of conversation over the near 20 years that I have been around the Mooney community that some want to 201 to return. That is what I have done and others can do as well as there are more owners experienced in the process. The vintage planes are great traveling machines after new equipment and updates are applied. They are also great retirement planes as maintenance in controllable. My thanks to Jimmy for his work considering the value offered by these birds. John Breda 1 Quote
M20F-1968 Posted October 24, 2021 Report Posted October 24, 2021 My post was listed without the information requested by Jimmy. It is: Name: John Breda Email address: john.breda@gmail.com Phone contact: (617) 877-0025 If Owner, The tail number> N954N Quote
M20F-1968 Posted October 24, 2021 Report Posted October 24, 2021 My post was listed without the information requested by Jimmy. It is: Name: John Breda Email address: john.breda@gmail.com Phone contact: (617) 877-0025 If Owner, The tail number: N954N Quote
M20F-1968 Posted October 24, 2021 Report Posted October 24, 2021 My post was listed without the information requested by Jimmy. It is: Name: John Breda Email address: john.breda@gmail.com Phone contact: (617) 877-0025 If Owner, The tail number: N954N Quote
M20F-1968 Posted October 24, 2021 Report Posted October 24, 2021 Jimmy: I would like a copy of your Vintage Evaluation. You can send it to my e-mail (john.breda@gmail.com) if possible. John Breda Quote
RPSwat Posted October 30, 2021 Report Posted October 30, 2021 Hey Jimmy, I would like a copy of your report. Name: Rick Swatloski Email address: RPSwatloski@gmail.com Phone contact: (205) 886-3411 N7043V I just purchased, and would like too see how the numbers compare. Thanks, Rick Quote
Hank Posted October 30, 2021 Report Posted October 30, 2021 @Rpswat, welcome, neighbor! What part of our great state do you inhabit? Also, a word of advice--replace a couple or three numbers in your phone with words, to make life more difficult for the spammers. 1 Quote
Jim Peace Posted November 2, 2021 Report Posted November 2, 2021 I would like a copy as well: JimApice@gmail.com Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.