Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know everyone here knows the joy of plane shopping, especially when it is someone else's money.  I've been checking all the typical websites weekly for months now to get an idea of the market, etc.... I'm looking at 80's M20J's with the requirement that they have a Garmin 430W/530W or better as I've read courtesy of you guys that it's cheaper to buy it that way than to install yourself.  I'm looking for feedback about the plane and specific things to look out for.  This is only one currently I have found that looks really appealing...

http://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/1407837/1986-mooney-m20j-201

Log review stand outs: Wing reseal '01, avg 10-20hrs per year until current owner bought in 2011.  Camshaft found corroded and MOH was done then.  Since then it's been averaging about 50hrs/yr., GTN 750 installed '13.

would love feedback from you experienced owners before I dive into these money pits. Thanks!

Posted

If it's in your budget I would think this one would be worth prompt investigating. I did not notice a listing date, is it fresh? 

I suspect you know of our advice for a PPI and a careful investigation to what might not be mentioned in the ad.

The only obvious, to me, missing equipment would be ADS-B compliance and the very nice byproduct of ADS-B -- TIS and NEXRAD which displays great on the GTN750. 

I own an old E and do not keep up with current market pricing but considering the nice paint and interior, the GTN750, and the fresh engine ISTM the value is there. (I would think 5 AMU is a reasonable budget for ADS-B. I like my GDL88 which might require a different xponder, not sure.)

Happy hunting!

Posted
1 hour ago, KSMooniac said:

Looks like a bargain to me, and I wouldn't expect it to sit on the market long at that price.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk

I second that emotion!

Posted

I would as well. But why not value it accordingly and make an offer if it's otherwise what you want. Then do the engine to what you want.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The tank reseal in 5632Y is a definite plus. I have the s-tec 60 pss in my J and one thing to ask is if it has auto-trim. Mine didn't and I broke down and added it. Without it you just have to manually trim the aircraft. In level flight it's not really and issue. It's nice to have when intercepting a glide slope. If memory serves it was a $6-7K. Not a deal breaker but something to consider.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On January 24, 2016 at 1:08 PM, KSMooniac said:

Looks like a bargain to me, and I wouldn't expect it to sit on the market long at that price.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk

You were right.  It sold the same week I created this post…now my next finds...

Posted

So still scouring the market for an M20J.  Would love some opinions on these options:

http://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/1417849/1981-mooney-m20j-201

http://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/1418221/1983-mooney-m20j-201

http://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/1413037/1992-mooney-m20j

I've been looking for something in the 500SMOH range, but some of these have some excellent autopilot/avionics upgrades.  I'm trying to determine which one should be tilting more towards the pros than the cons since there is such variety. 

 

Posted

Me I'd buy a higher time engine anyway and do my own fresh overhaul in a couple of years...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

The 1981 J would be my first choice depending on engine time.  Love the panel on that aircraft.  The mx20 is not nearly as useful as another gtn IMO...especially with all the tablets these days.

Posted
1 hour ago, PeytonM said:

3-blades on a 201 of marginal benefit. Prob some climb improvement, but some loss in cruise speed.

Thanks for the input. I was wondering if there would be any performance difference. 

Posted
Just now, Godfather said:

The 1981 J would be my first choice depending on engine time.  Love the panel on that aircraft.  The mx20 is not nearly as useful as another gtn IMO...especially with all the tablets these days.

Yea the MX20 is a no factor in my book. There is some interesting info I found out concerning the logs on the '81. 

MOH in 2006. Then case crack in '14 leading to bottom end replacement. In '15 a top overhaul was done. 1550hrs since '06 in its present state. 

Posted

My first choice would be the first one although...

I could not find how much time was on the engine.

Unless you NEVER plan on putting more than 3 people in the plane, I would also ask about useful load.  Could not find it for either of the first two.

Did not see a price on the last one.

Posted (edited)
On 1/24/2016 at 0:28 PM, BigAirHarper said:

I know everyone here knows the joy of plane shopping, especially when it is someone else's money.  I've been checking all the typical websites weekly for months now to get an idea of the market, etc.... I'm looking at 80's M20J's with the requirement that they have a Garmin 430W/530W or better as I've read courtesy of you guys that it's cheaper to buy it that way than to install yourself.  I'm looking for feedback about the plane and specific things to look out for.  This is only one currently I have found that looks really appealing...

http://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/1407837/1986-mooney-m20j-201

Log review stand outs: Wing reseal '01, avg 10-20hrs per year until current owner bought in 2011.  Camshaft found corroded and MOH was done then.  Since then it's been averaging about 50hrs/yr., GTN 750 installed '13.

would love feedback from you experienced owners before I dive into these money pits. Thanks!

Besides the G530W look that it has a good autopilot like the Century 31 or KFC150 or better. 1982 and later have the rear split seats than can be easily removed (3 min) to make a large cargo area. 

José

Edited by Piloto
Posted
2 hours ago, Bob - S50 said:

My first choice would be the first one although...

I could not find how much time was on the engine.

Unless you NEVER plan on putting more than 3 people in the plane, I would also ask about useful load.  Could not find it for either of the first two.

Did not see a price on the last one.

Yea the engine is questionable.  In a post above I described it but will repost here to get more opinions on the current engine situation:

For 1st plane listed the 1981 one:

Major overhaul in 2006. Then case crack in '14 leading to bottom end replacement. In '15 a top overhaul was done. 1550hrs since '06 in its present state. So engine has an assortment of part replacements making me question it.  Now...the plane sat for 3 months after July 2015 and then has flown about 15 hrs since....

Posted

This one looks pretty bad ass, but its a 1992 and $150K: http://www.mooneypilots.com/sales/medlin.html

Airframe TTSN 2303
Engine TSMO 181 TIO-540-AF1B
Prop TSO 0
Annual 4-2015

Avionics:

Garmin GMA-340 Audio panel
Garmin GNS-530 WAAS
Garmin 330 Transponder
King KI-256 Altitude indicator
King KC-525A HSI
King KX-165 NAV/COM KI 202 Indicator
King KR-87 ADF KI-227 Synchronized Indicator
King KAP-150 Auto pilot altitude preselect
King KN-62A DME
OPTIONS
Dual batteries
Precise FLT- speedbrakes
Oxygen bottle
Hot prop
JDI EDM 700 Engine monitor
406 - elt
Dual alternators , dual vacuum pumps.

Posted

I'd go with the '81 as well if I had to choose now.  However, I would likely hold out until I could find one with a GTN 750 installed.  Very nice upgrade to have over a GNS series.  If you're sticking with a J, I'd certainly stick with a 2 blade prop and have it dynamically balanced if it seems rough during operation.  Better efficiency with a 2 blade, especially on this platform.  Happy hunting!

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.