gsengle

Basic Member
  • Content Count

    2,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

gsengle last won the day on April 11 2017

gsengle had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,139 Excellent

1 Follower

About gsengle

  • Rank
    Won't Leave!
  • Birthday 04/06/1970

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    gregsengle

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Northampton, MA
  • Interests
    run bike ski tennis FLY
  • Reg #
    N890RD
  • Model
    M20R

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The problem is I won’t fly widespread low IFR in a single, so not many. That said, with 1000ft ceilings I’d still rather fly the LPV or any RNAV than any other kind of approach. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Maybe 75-100 a year. But for a living... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Yes but he was flying in Florida. I’m asking if anyone knows the nature of the operation that conducted that flight. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. On the deceased pilot? Was it a commercial flight? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. Appears to be a 1980 which should have a crossfeed shut off, I believe. http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2018/12/cessna-335-n79hp-fatal-accident.html Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. No again. All we know is that particular pilot didn’t succeed. We don’t know it wasn’t flyable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. Learn something new every day. That said by newest we mean since the late 70s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. A 400 series Cessna has a crossfeed shut off. Engine fire is as follows: Fuel pumps off, tanks main, crossfeed shut off pull, then for engine in question, throttle close, then mixture cut off (at my company before prop), prop feather, cowl flap close, fuel off, fly the airplane. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. And that calls for abort on the runway straight ahead. Half or more is probably remaining depending on weight. It’s not a short runway if I recall. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. So, none of the above? Lots of engineers here too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Jose, do you have an A&P? Do you have your Multi? Or Commercial or ATP? Have you had an engine failure in a multi? Your compatriots here have / have had all of the above. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Again wrong Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. That proves for an endurance test where you’re willing to risk your life, that a single is more efficient... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. Yeah that would take down all your engines, single or multi... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. Anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy. I’ll refrain from posting all the light singles that went down this last month.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk