Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Bob,

Here's the Van's air dams for the IO-360 engines. I'll make full size copies for you tomorrow morning and e-mail them to you. I think I'll be installing these on Matt's during his upcoming annual next week. Your cooler temps have me believing too much air is blocked on his. Time for some more testing.

David

 

image.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Marauder said:

 

Ok, here are my numbers from today:

 

Flew 5500 @ 75%, leaned to 80° ROP, FF 10.9, MP 23.7, RPM 2530, 155 KTAS

 

e4e87163341fd8c15b8dda0852836d22.jpg

 

db5d0959f8ca3cb11daaf0f2cbdf6d32.jpg

 

Flew 6500 @ 72%, leaned to 80° ROP, FF 11.0, MP 22.7, RPM 2520, 153 KTAS

 

613adafa2dae6582c65c03e23bbb0fff.jpg

 

50717643160abdc057ee12a6dd38ddc6.jpg

 

Flew 7500 @ 70%, leaned to 80° ROP, FF 11.0, MP 21.7, RPM 2540, 152 KTAS

 

7e775470015f6b67c3448f29f92445dc.jpg

 

c839f173274a9e2ba34390a60a9caa4c.jpg

 

What I think is strange is that my fuel flow hovered right around 10.9 GPH at the different altitudes.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Chris, your temps and speeds are really great. I'm not sure my speeds will beat that by much and I know my temps will be higher. You ought to hang on to that bird.

  • Like 2
Posted
3500msl, 40 LOPd9e30ed260fca11dc16913e92eadefd1.jpg 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Time for some CiES fuel senders to get rid of that pesky “fuel mismatch” error message. Fueled up today, JPI showed 0.1 gallons difference between actual and indicated and fuel gauges were smack on.

 

What was your TAS at that LOP setting?

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Climbing at 120 MPH9fa544aa8a4c4bc8e34b70661df2d30f.jpg

 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

What altitude? Judging by your MP, I would say you are in the 5.5 to 6.5 k. At that altitude, Vy+10 (110 KIAS) and OAT, I would be in the 340 range max.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Posted
Chris, your temps and speeds are really great. I'm not sure my speeds will beat that by much and I know my temps will be higher. You ought to hang on to that bird.


She has always been a solid running plane for me. I remember doing the Lasar cowl mod to help raise temps since I saw some cold winter numbers living in Buffalo.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Posted
100 ROP. 6500MSL0a827dfc8a42d439b08d9b693ce4e401.jpg

 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Looking closer at your numbers. No real difference between MP, I’m running 40 RPM more than you, the OAT is 27°F for me, 12°F for you, cylinders are ~30° hotter on your plane. and a 0.4 GPH higher fuel flow for you. Oil temp in your bird is ~20° warmer.

 

What was your TAS?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

And just for the cake on this Mooney pie, I flew with a Piper owner today. First time in a Mooney. He is a prospective Mooney buyer. He kept asking me if he could buy my Mooney. He was commenting how he would be see high 70 knots ground speed with the headwinds we had. I was showing 130.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Posted
East coast or west coast tonight, Cap’n Marauder?
-a-


East coast. Just did one of those old man nap things most of the evening. You on the other hand!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 2
Posted

Waiting to see the markets open on the other side of the pond..

Got to figure out a way to keep up in the panel wars... :)

GTN, JPI, and other 2020 things... ESI500 just to get ahead...

Enjoying the engineering level discussion in this thread....

reserved the Old man naps for weekdays... after the gym or after the jog... :)

You’re going to love retirement!

Best regards,

-a-

 

Posted
 
Looking closer at your numbers. No real difference between MP, I’m running 40 RPM more than you, the OAT is 27°F for me, 12°F for you, cylinders are ~30° hotter on your plane. and a 0.4 GPH higher fuel flow for you. Oil temp in your bird is ~20° warmer.
 
What was your TAS?
 
 
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
I didn't do a tas test. I was indicating 143. I'm guessing about 149 or so

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Posted
 
What altitude? Judging by your MP, I would say you are in the 5.5 to 6.5 k. At that altitude, Vy+10 (110 KIAS) and OAT, I would be in the 340 range max.
 
 
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
This was towards the end of the climb to 6500

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Posted
 Time for some CiES fuel senders to get rid of that pesky “fuel mismatch” error message. Fueled up today, JPI showed 0.1 gallons difference between actual and indicated and fuel gauges were smack on.
 
What was your TAS at that LOP setting?
 
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
 
 
I would love to do the new senders, but too many things are pulling at my account right now.
The true airspeed at 3500 feet in this configuration is about 137. That's a calculated speed based on a hundred and thirty-three indicated.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Marauder said:

 


She has always been a solid running plane for me. I remember doing the Lasar cowl mod to help raise temps since I saw some cold winter numbers living in Buffalo.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

Yeah, you certainly could run a lot hotter w/o worry. I am a little puzzled about the EGT peaks. Are the probes 6" below the flange on the exhaust header? Maybe @kortopates can tell us how much variation there is in peak EGTs. My 1500-1525 might be the outlier. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bob_Belville said:

Yeah, you certainly could run a lot hotter w/o worry. I am a little puzzled about the EGT peaks. Are the probes 6" below the flange on the exhaust header? Maybe @kortopates can tell us how much variation there is in peak EGTs. My 1500-1525 might be the outlier. 

Bob -- mine are around 3 inches below the flange. I think the actual temps will vary a lot and not to take them as absolutes. If your probes are 6 inches down on the tubes, you may be at a hotter point in the exhaust plume.

5aa68f26d6428_IMG_2877(2).JPG.4a376e98fea5a5205a22c3c6c0cc4187.JPG

Edited by Marauder
  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, carusoam said:

Waiting to see the markets open on the other side of the pond..

Got to figure out a way to keep up in the panel wars... :)

GTN, JPI, and other 2020 things... ESI500 just to get ahead...

Enjoying the engineering level discussion in this thread....

reserved the Old man naps for weekdays... after the gym or after the jog... :)

You’re going to love retirement!

Best regards,

-a-

 

It's easy. Just give them your wallet, first born and the note on your most expensive car.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Marauder said:

Bob -- mine are around 3 inches below the flange. I think the actual temps will vary a lot and not to take them as absolutes. If your probes are 6 inches down on the tubes, you may be at a hotter point in the exhaust plume.

5aa68f26d6428_IMG_2877(2).JPG.4a376e98fea5a5205a22c3c6c0cc4187.JPG

I think that explains the difference. 

943RW001.JPG

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Bob_Belville said:

I think that explains the difference. 

943RW001.JPG

Yep. I suspect the temperature leaving the cylinder increases a bit after the flange. How uniform are your EGTs? As you saw from mine, they are close.

Edited by Marauder
Posted
1 minute ago, Marauder said:

Yep. I suspect the temperature leaving the cylinder increases a bit after the flange. How uniform are your EGTs?

Very close. JPI manuel calls difference of 70-90 normal, my last flight max EGTs were 1502, 1519, 1494, 1506. Difference 25.

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Bob_Belville said:

I think that explains the difference. 

943RW001.JPG

That fuel line passes less than one inche from the red hot #4 exhaust stack. I pulled mine back and clamped it to the intake tube to keep it away 

Edited by jetdriven
Posted
3 hours ago, Bob_Belville said:

Yeah, you certainly could run a lot hotter w/o worry. I am a little puzzled about the EGT peaks. Are the probes 6" below the flange on the exhaust header? Maybe @kortopates can tell us how much variation there is in peak EGTs. My 1500-1525 might be the outlier. 

Honestly we don't even look at or consider actual or absolute values of peak EGT and we only give some attention to the size of the spread. We see spread sizes all over the map, and it varies widely on the same engine based on MAP or throttle setting because this can effect mixture distribution as well. But usually injected engines have a pretty tight spread at cruise power. But if we see a change in spread size then its time to investigate. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jetdriven said:

That fuel line passes less than one inche from the red hot #4 exhaust stack. I pulled mine back and clamped it to the intake tube to keep it away 

Oh no! Clarence has rubbed off on you! ;) 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, kortopates said:

Honestly we don't even look at or consider actual or absolute values of peak EGT and we only give some attention to the size of the spread. We see spread sizes all over the map, and it varies widely on the same engine based on MAP or throttle setting because this can effect mixture distribution as well. But usually injected engines have a pretty tight spread at cruise power. But if we see a change in spread size then its time to investigate. 

I can tell you one thing... When you had me do those GAMI and mag flight tests, I saw some really HOT EGTs.

  • Like 2
Posted

Nice observation on the EGT placement...

High MAP and ROP, the flames will be pretty far down the exhaust tube continuously converting fuel to heat and exhaust getting hotter the whole way...

Balancing the getting hotter the whole way, the exhaust gasses will be expanding rapidly, providing adiabatic cooling...

To Make raw EGT number comparisons useable between engines would require standardizing the exact location of the EGT probes.  

In this case, Each mm counts.

The one place where raw EGT gets used is measuring the turbine inlet temp TIT.  This raw EGT data is in a standardized location.

More challenges for understanding comes with TIT...

  • The TIT is further down the exhaust system.
  • often reads higher than individual EGTs further up.
  • Conversion of fuel is most complete further down.
  • combined flow from multiple exhaust streams.
  • EGT is an average over time.
  • hot exhaust gasses come in waves, as the exhaust valve opens.
  • A turbo keeps the exhaust pressure from dropping quickly.  Minimizing the adiabatic cooling effect.

The importance of the raw number here...  protecting the exhaust parts in contact with the waves of very high temps.  

Protecting the tubes and turbine blades from erosion....

For the NA engine... EGTs relative to peak tell 99% of the story in flight.

Other Questions.... what’s causing the stain running down Bob’s #4(?) exhaust tube?

PP thoughts only,

-a-

Posted
1 minute ago, carusoam said:

Other Questions.... what’s causing the stain running down Bob’s #4(?) exhaust tube?

PP thoughts only,

-a-

He has oil on the oil cooler lines as well. The staining on the #4 looks like it is originating from the valve cover gasket. Look under the nut on the flange, looks like the starting point.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.