Jump to content

FlyingDude

Supporter
  • Posts

    1,167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Michigan
  • Interests
    Flying
  • Reg #
    N--51F
  • Model
    M20E

Recent Profile Visitors

3,808 profile views

FlyingDude's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Year In
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Reacting Well

Recent Badges

427

Reputation

  1. Just turn off the alternator field in flight and you'll read the actual current draw instantly .
  2. @Bolter yea, I had found those resources, too, but the sectional mentions that specific VTPC so I had to see that. It's in the Ontaio VFR supplement...
  3. ... it means that the humor is not funny. Anyway, I wasn't expecting humorous comments from you after all your lawyer style arguments. You caught me off guard.
  4. Why should there be a problem if the CG is within the range?
  5. While you're here: how can I verify the requirements for an overflight? All this time I've thought just a valid ICAO flight plan would suffice, but I just want to double check. In Europe (at least 15 years go) we had to note the citizenship and ID number of each occupant on the flight plan. Should I still get a customs decal, in case an occupant needs to use the bathroom urgently? It won't hurt to bring our passports with us. Thanks.
  6. Uhm, what is it? Variable weights? Cg? Insufficient hatrack floor? I wasn't asking you to settle on an option. Especially after I disproved the one reason you have been defending all this time (cg). Reread the ballast, gfc servos, 406 elt. I think the ballast was 40lb at the empennage. Pretty big moment. It's very simple. The plane can handle more weights aft of that station. So it's not a CG issue. The hatrack is suitable for ejecting its content, that's why they prescribed soft items and limited their weight. Given the low weight, they saved on the hatrack floor to make it lightweight because it should not carry heavy stuff.
  7. There's an stc to put skis that far back. Some mooneys require ballast at the empennage hinge. I really don't think it's a cg issue. The floor of the hat rack is not truly robust, from how I see it but did they really test it for the max g forces? Who knows. However they did care to mention the soft loads. That's proof enough into what they were thinking.
  8. We do. Any higher number, and people would put things that would hurt them. And 10 is a round number.
  9. Thanks for reminding me to check the POH OK, maybe "you had it coming" is a better translation of what I wanted to say than "you deserved it." But still. Don't put your tools there. Not even a screwdriver.
  10. Of course if you are keeping your 9.9lb toolbox in there, you pretty much deserved it. I keep soft stuff, like roll of paper shop towels, head pillows, beach towels, etc. So, yea, those objects hitting me would be the least of my problems in a crash. I also keep a box of AA and AAA batteries, but the boxes are thinner than the height of ledge, so I am wishfully assuming that they would be secured in a rapid deceleration.
  11. In case anyone is interested, vtpcs are not separate documents. Niagara vtpc is 2 pages in the Ontario vfr supplement.
  12. Because it's not secured (no tie down or door) and whatever's there will become a projectile in case of a crash.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.