cliffy Posted January 31, 2016 Report Posted January 31, 2016 This parallels the "polished aluminum" thread Just thinkin' If we have to check the balance of control surfaces after we paint them and before flight- do we need to check their balance if we remove the paint and fly them that way? In other words, if they came off painted and in balance and we remove the paint, are they still within balance limits? Quote
Guest Posted January 31, 2016 Report Posted January 31, 2016 The manual has a note saying paint is to be stripped before re painting and that static balance limits are for painted surfaces. I don't see why the limits would change for unpainted or polished surfaces. Clarence Quote
cliffy Posted February 1, 2016 Author Report Posted February 1, 2016 Not saying the "limits" would change but that removing the paint will change the balance point (by the weight of the paint removed) and would they now be in balance "clean"? The limits say "not to exceed" and removing paint would more than likely reduce the overcenter weight BUT- Would one not want to (or be required to) check the balance again after the paint was removed and the surface polished if one was going to fly it that way? Quote
Hank Posted February 1, 2016 Report Posted February 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, cliffy said: Not saying the "limits" would change but that removing the paint will change the balance point (by the weight of the paint removed) and would they now be in balance "clean"? The limits say "not to exceed" and removing paint would more than likely reduce the overcenter weight BUT- Would one not want to (or be required to) check the balance again after the paint was removed and the surface polished if one was going to fly it that way? Yes, they should be rebalanced whether stripped and repainted or stripped and polished. The balance limits should be the same, regardless of the amount of paint applied. My own are base coated with colored stripes running front to back across the ailerons. Quote
Yetti Posted February 1, 2016 Report Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) I was under the impression that Mooney test flys the planes unpainted. Then paints them. Best I can tell Mooney painted with all the control surfaces on the airframe. Edited February 1, 2016 by Yetti Quote
cliffy Posted February 1, 2016 Author Report Posted February 1, 2016 I'd be willing to bet that whatever way the factory flies the surfaces they get balance checked before they go airborne. Quote
MB65E Posted February 1, 2016 Report Posted February 1, 2016 Last I checked there was no min weight published on the trailing edge. Only a max allowable weight at the trailing edge. I don't see the need to check the balance if the paint is removed. It's lighter and will be less prone to flutter. An overweight or aft edge heavy flight control will be less stable. Some manufactures list a MAX weight of the flight control. I have seen new airplanes from mooney with freshly painted flight control hardware. I highly doubt they balance every surface. The ailerons are espically hard to get in balance with paint on them. I'd always recomend a full strip of flight controls during a repainted. I pulled 6 layers of of some in the past. They were heavy when I pulled them off, but never had any issues in flight. If you paint them, please check the balance. -Matt Quote
Guest Posted February 1, 2016 Report Posted February 1, 2016 I just checked the C,E,F,G manual, it list a minimum and maximum weight for trailing edge heavy. Clarence Quote
MB65E Posted February 1, 2016 Report Posted February 1, 2016 Thanks Clarence, I'll check the other J material I have. Some have minimum weights, and that's where the confusion was I believe. -Matt Quote
1964-M20E Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 OK I'm reviving this thread. just out of curiosity I just watched a highly sped up time lapse sequence of an Emirates passenger jet 737 or similar get repainted. They stripped the plane cleaned it and repainted it. I never saw the control surfaces removed for balancing?? Is this a Mooney thing? (FAA regs I believe call for this) Do they do it another way on the plane that was not show? Is the ratio of the mass of the control surface to the mass of the paint so much greater on a 737 that it is negligible and does not need to be considered? Did I just miss the step due to the time lapse or camera angles? Emirates doesn't need to comply with FAA regs (they fly outside US airspace) and it is not required over there? Quote
ArtVandelay Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 Do they paint the control surfaces or even the wings, thought it was fuselage and tail only.Tom Quote
1964-M20E Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 No they stripped everything and repainted the whole plane Quote
RLCarter Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 Maybe the control surfaces get balanced in a different way (on the aircraft) than our little bug smashers? Quote
Prior owner Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 Technically, you’ve got to weigh the aircraft after painting it, as well... no other way to accurately determine the weight change. Quote
PT20J Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 Control surfaces are mass balanced primarily to prevent flutter. There are other methods that may be used. For instance, analysis might show that a particular configuration will not flutter without balancing. Modern airliners have irreversible controls which might be less prone to flutter. So, there is no general rule except to do whatever the maintenance manual calls out for your airplane. Quote
Prior owner Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 I have read somewhere in this site that an old Mooney test pilot stated that the tail control surfaces on our planes will not flutter because the trailing edges are swept forward... Quote
PT20J Posted April 26, 2019 Report Posted April 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, PilotCoyote said: I have read somewhere in this site that an old Mooney test pilot stated that the tail control surfaces on our planes will not flutter because the trailing edges are swept forward... Another interesting Mooney Myth If it were true, Mooney wouldn't need to specify control surface balance. Quote
boeingroam Posted September 29, 2021 Report Posted September 29, 2021 controls that are hydraulic dont need balance(737,etc) just the controls with cable control. Quote
N201MKTurbo Posted September 29, 2021 Report Posted September 29, 2021 30 minutes ago, boeingroam said: controls that are hydraulic dont need balance(737,etc) just the controls with cable control. https://www.ndt.net/article/aero2013/content/papers/11_Hinken.pdf This document describes how to balance the control surfaces on a 737 after painting. 1 Quote
Hector Posted September 29, 2021 Report Posted September 29, 2021 Finished quite a bit of painting on my bird last weekend (everything you see white) but avoided the ailerons because I did not want to remove them for balancing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote
EricJ Posted September 29, 2021 Report Posted September 29, 2021 7 minutes ago, Hector said: Finished quite a bit of painting on my bird last weekend (everything you see white) but avoided the ailerons because I did not want to remove them for balancing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Tell me you really put a window in your hatch. Quote
Hector Posted September 29, 2021 Report Posted September 29, 2021 Tell me you really put a window in your hatch. No, it’s just painted brown there to give the illusion of a third window Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro 2 Quote
Raymond J1 Posted September 30, 2021 Report Posted September 30, 2021 I also painted windows in addition... To have more natural light... For the balance of the control surfaces, the manufacturer's values are maximum tolerated static moments, to be checked after painting or even varnishing. After stripping, you are rather on the minimum side. On some aircraft, especially those with cable controls, there is also a maximum gap in mass between the ailerons that should not be exceeded. Quote
carusoam Posted September 30, 2021 Report Posted September 30, 2021 10 hours ago, boeingroam said: controls that are hydraulic dont need balance(737,etc) just the controls with cable control. Welcome aboard br… Mooney controls are neither… hydraulic or cable. The service manual has the instructions for painting and balancing requirements… PP thoughts only, not a mechanic… Best regards, -a- Quote
A64Pilot Posted October 3, 2021 Report Posted October 3, 2021 (edited) Cable or push pull tube they have to have the balance checked, but as one poster said removing the paint will most certainly push the balance towards nose heavy which means it becomes even more resistant to flutter, but check to be sure Flutter is terrifying, flutter can cause a surface to be torn off, or even an entire empennage, and sometimes there is nothing at all you can do about it, so check the balance. Good friend of mine doing one of the velocity dive tests of the 114 Commander for Certification had the elevator get into flutter, Rockwell recreated the incident in the wind tunnel, the time between flutter initiation and complete empennage failure was supposedly less than 1 sec. ‘If you want to look up the accident report the aircraft tail number was 114AC. 114 was the model number and AC for Aero Commander, pretty sure it was the 114 and not the 112 . On edit, if you have to rebalance after painting, balance towards being within range, but nose heavy as any repairs in the future or repainting will most likely add more weight to the tail as there is way more surface area there and if you start nose heavy, maybe you will be within limits still. Edited October 3, 2021 by A64Pilot Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.