Culver LFA Posted December 21, 2019 Report Posted December 21, 2019 That’s not a Mooney fuel tank, it’s not leaking! 1 4 Quote
larrynimmo Posted December 21, 2019 Report Posted December 21, 2019 wouldn't it be neat to have a useful, 1 gallon emergency fuel tank that would stay fresh and ready to go if you run out of fuel? "ace in the hole"...hopefully no one should ever run out of fuel, but in the event. I am even too scared of "testing" my mooney low fuel lights for each tank...I can test the bulbs by pushing the annunciator test, but I have never actually tested the function. My personal minimums is that I wont let my fuel to knowingly to go much below 10 gallons on each side. 1 Quote
Guest Posted December 21, 2019 Report Posted December 21, 2019 From the IPC it’s part of the fuel vent system for s/n 3 thru 446. Item 73 Looks like you’re stuck with it. Clarence Quote
xcrmckenna Posted December 21, 2019 Report Posted December 21, 2019 wouldn't it be neat to have a useful, 1 gallon emergency fuel tank that would stay fresh and ready to go if you run out of fuel? "ace in the hole"...hopefully no one should ever run out of fuel, but in the event. I am even too scared of "testing" my mooney low fuel lights for each tank...I can test the bulbs by pushing the annunciator test, but I have never actually tested the function. My personal minimums is that I wont let my fuel to knowingly to go much below 10 gallons on each side. Pilots will find a way to run out of fuel no matter what add ons they have in their plane. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote
EricJ Posted December 22, 2019 Report Posted December 22, 2019 13 minutes ago, M20Doc said: From the IPC it’s part of the fuel vent system for s/n 3 thru 446. Item 73 Looks like you’re stuck with it. Clarence Wow, that's interesting. Could probably still smuggle stuff with it, tho... Quote
GeeBee Posted December 22, 2019 Report Posted December 22, 2019 I actually think he could get rid of it but it will require some money and a DER. If he can reconfigure the vent system to that of S/N 447 and beyond and show there is no difference between those airplanes and his reconfigured vent design, he certainly has adequate engineering data for a DER to sign off on the modification. Quote
Ibra Posted December 22, 2019 Report Posted December 22, 2019 1 hour ago, xcrmckenna said: Pilots will find a way to run out of fuel no matter what add ons they have in their plane. 1 USG gives you the option to switch your field to another one nearby in the last seconds of your forced landing 1 Quote
xcrmckenna Posted December 22, 2019 Report Posted December 22, 2019 1 USG gives you the option to switch your field to another one nearby in the last seconds of your forced landing Right, unless you forget you just used it up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote
khedrei Posted December 22, 2019 Author Report Posted December 22, 2019 Hmmm it looks like I'm in for a challenge if I'm stuck with it. He says it's in the way of the bolts where the A/P roll servo will mount. I'll suggest he call Garmin to see if they have a solution. I will also call another avionics shop that did the same A/P in another K and find out if they had the same issue. I assume they would have since it was a '79 and mine is '80. Not sure what I have to go through to get it removed. Things like that are much more difficult in Canada than they are in the US. Thanks Clarence Quote
skykrawler Posted December 24, 2019 Report Posted December 24, 2019 Good sleuthing by M20Doc. I was surprised nobody on the forum was familiar with this design. What a PTA...how would you get it out of the hole? Wonder what Don M would suggest. Quote
Shiny moose Posted December 24, 2019 Report Posted December 24, 2019 I wonder about who approved the autopilot STC on these models ? Someone did not do all the research Quote
chriscalandro Posted December 24, 2019 Report Posted December 24, 2019 If this isn’t worthy of an “oof” I don’t know what is. Quote
Jeev Posted December 25, 2019 Report Posted December 25, 2019 On 12/21/2019 at 3:56 PM, M20Doc said: From the IPC it’s part of the fuel vent system for s/n 3 thru 446. Item 73 Looks like you’re stuck with it. Clarence WOW, I learned something new about Mooneys. Nice detective work Clarance!! Quote
RLCarter Posted December 25, 2019 Report Posted December 25, 2019 On 12/21/2019 at 5:56 PM, M20Doc said: From the IPC it’s part of the fuel vent system for s/n 3 thru 446. Item 73 Looks like you’re stuck with it. Clarence California Emissions..... 1 3 Quote
khedrei Posted December 26, 2019 Author Report Posted December 26, 2019 I appreciate the help from all posters. Especially from Clarence. I figured I would update this for anyone that might have the same issue with my serial range and the new autopilot. My avionics guy told me that Garmin came up with a solution quite quickly. The more I hear about Garmin the more I like them. Not cheap, but you get what you pay for. Quote
kortopates Posted December 26, 2019 Report Posted December 26, 2019 I appreciate the help from all posters. Especially from Clarence. I figured I would update this for anyone that might have the same issue with my serial range and the new autopilot. My avionics guy told me that Garmin came up with a solution quite quickly. The more I hear about Garmin the more I like them. Not cheap, but you get what you pay for. What was Garmin's solution - you didn't say yet?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
spistora Posted December 27, 2019 Report Posted December 27, 2019 2 hours ago, khedrei said: I appreciate the help from all posters. Especially from Clarence. I figured I would update this for anyone that might have the same issue with my serial range and the new autopilot. My avionics guy told me that Garmin came up with a solution quite quickly. The more I hear about Garmin the more I like them. Not cheap, but you get what you pay for. Good to know, my K is in the same serial number range. I'm interested to hear how the rest of the install goes. Quote
khedrei Posted December 27, 2019 Author Report Posted December 27, 2019 I dont know exactly but my avionics guy said it had to do with changing some angles slightly. It was actually not the servo bracket but the pully bracket that was the problem. I assume the cable from the servo to the pulley was able to go in at a slightly different angle? Or something like that. I don't want to say too much because I dont actually know the details. From what he told me it didnt sound like a major change. Regardless, Garmin came up with it. 1 Quote
SheryLoewen Posted January 5, 2020 Report Posted January 5, 2020 Early M20K's had this tank as a fuel return from the Fuel injector. OEM Mooney system. Paul Loewen 1 Quote
bradp Posted January 6, 2020 Report Posted January 6, 2020 If it was a good design you’d have seen it on SN448 and above. Quote
ETXflyboy_f14 Posted April 23, 2024 Report Posted April 23, 2024 For anyone who does not know, this is the factory installed "Aux Tank" out of the MAN235 M20K Parts manual Item #73 in the Fuel system.... I have not seen ran into this problem until the current project we are working on now. Garmin does have a note for this issue... If you read note 36 in the M20K GFC 500 Install manual on page 3 at the end of the notes section, Garmin clearly gives alternatives for positioning of the bracket and attaching hardware to be revered in order to be installed behind the tank. 1 Quote
goodyFAB Posted April 25, 2024 Report Posted April 25, 2024 Yeah almost certain I’ve seen it in my wing too. M20k serial 150Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.