Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:12 PM, Yooper Rocketman said:

Oh boy. Thanks @PTK   

Here’s the text I just got from the shop owner.  This will get interesting.  

Tom

5E0D4B8E-6C3D-4D92-AE71-DBF21E97F77B.png

Expand  

Mooneyspace mind trust avionics install auditing department to the rescue!

Now - almost time to go charge up your phone.

Edited by aviatoreb
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:12 PM, Yooper Rocketman said:

Oh boy. Thanks @PTK   

Here’s the text I just got from the shop owner.  This will get interesting.  

Expand  
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:24 PM, MIm20c said:

At this point in the game I’d really think long and hard about using a shop that didn’t realize the 256 AI is still needed for attitude reference. UNLESS he knows about a new adapter box coming out for the G5 or g3x. A huge chunk of the fleet is using that type of system. 

Expand  

This wouldn’t concern me! It’s easy to get confused. Especially when dealing with numerous systems and manufacturers as avionics shops do. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 9:16 PM, ZuluZulu said:

Not even Bob Hoover pulled aileron rolls like that!

Expand  

Neil Armstrong "enjoyed" a day like that one Gemini 8 ride that went wrong and almost tragically wrong.

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1966-020A

I read roll rate increased to 296 rev/sec.  It was rolling so fast that the danger was they would pass out, and if that had happened, it would have been a disaster outcome. Good ol' Neil figured it out and saved the day.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:34 PM, PTK said:

This wouldn’t concern me! It’s easy to get confused. Especially when dealing with numerous systems and manufacturers as avionics shops do. 

Expand  

You’re right. He probably has multiple aircraft on the mind right now and is working long hours trying to get everyone in ASAP. He also might have thought YRM was keeping the AI just for attitude reference. That would be my strategy right now, keep the old AI and install it on the copilot side. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:50 PM, MIm20c said:

You’re right. He probably has multiple aircraft on the mind right now and is working long hours trying to get everyone in ASAP. He also might have thought YRM was keeping the AI just for attitude reference. That would be my strategy right now, keep the old AI and install it on the copilot side. 

Expand  

No doubt. Whenever I go into my avionics shop they look like they've been running marathons. They've been eyeballs deep in ADS-B inspired new panels for the last 5 years. The waiting list is 9 months.

-Robert

  • Like 1
Posted

I wouldn’t be too critical of the avionics shop.  Think 10-15 years ago there were releases of new technology every couple of years.  Now it’s difficult to keep up with all the changes in how the electrons fly around on a weekly basis. 
 

or wait until next week - you may be able to replace your Ki256 with a g5 ... 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 10:34 PM, PTK said:

This wouldn’t concern me! It’s easy to get confused. Especially when dealing with numerous systems and manufacturers as avionics shops do. 

Expand  

I could NEVER disclose the price he was giving our mercy flight organization as he deep discounted the labor, had a huge discount on the Garmin product he was passing on to us for the ability to demo the install AND due to support he obtained from Garmin.  In addition, his 3 man shop, 5 years ago, now has 30+ employees.  He is expanding so fast he can't keep up with everything like he would like.  This is a A+ business owner.

We'll figure it out.  The amount of support he has done for our organization far exceeds any negative from this situation.

Thanks again Peter for the help on this!!

Tom

 

  • Like 6
Posted
  On 1/10/2020 at 11:51 PM, Yooper Rocketman said:

I could NEVER disclose the price he was giving our mercy flight organization as he deep discounted the labor, had a huge discount on the Garmin product he was passing on to us for the ability to demo the install ...

Tom

 

Expand  

My shop sells all the hardware at wholesale and marks up the labor. Saves the 10% California tax as much as posible.

-Robert

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 6:04 PM, Austintatious said:

Someone tell Garmin that if they make the G5 capable of working as primary attitude and FD with legacy Autopilots,  as of yesturday, They can put me down for 2 units!

Expand  

And me for one more (I already have one) and probably a GFC500 when the King a/p eventually gives up.

Posted

I’m curious what owners are willing to pay for this converter box.  Garmin and aspen both have D/A boxes for the lateral navigation in the $700-$1k range. They also currently have boxes that output attitude info in the $3k range (only G500 and txi for Garmin). 
 

Are owners looking for a $1k, $2k, or a $3k converter box to work with the G5?

Posted (edited)
  On 1/14/2020 at 6:51 PM, MIm20c said:

I’m curious what owners are willing to pay for this converter box.  Garmin and aspen both have D/A boxes for the lateral navigation in the $700-$1k range. They also currently have boxes that output attitude info in the $3k range (only G500 and txi for Garmin). 
 

Are owners looking for a $1k, $2k, or a $3k converter box to work with the G5?

Expand  

The KI 300+ KA 310 is $4688 from one website.

The G5 is $2249. So, $2k is reasonable, $2500 just so I don't have to buy any more King gear :) and can rip out my entire vacuum system.

 

Edited by Steve W
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 6:04 PM, Austintatious said:

Someone tell Garmin that if they make the G5 capable of working as primary attitude and FD with legacy Autopilots,  as of yesturday, They can put me down for 2 units!

Expand  

Did they announce something? Is there an announcement coming? I haven't read anything to that effect.

Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 7:58 PM, PTK said:

Did they announce something? Is there an announcement coming? I haven't read anything to that effect.

Expand  

Nah, just the continuing persistent rumor. Since they just announced new stuff last week I'd expect the next set of rumors before Sun 'n Fun. and then we can all be disappointed still.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 6:51 PM, MIm20c said:

I’m curious what owners are willing to pay for this converter box.  Garmin and aspen both have D/A boxes for the lateral navigation in the $700-$1k range. They also currently have boxes that output attitude info in the $3k range (only G500 and txi for Garmin). 
 

Are owners looking for a $1k, $2k, or a $3k converter box to work with the G5?

Expand  

Well roughly a dual G5 and a single Aspen 1000 Max is about the same installed.  The Aspen EA100 is $3k extra.  If Garmin did this for $1k it would tip in their direction.  For either company I would strategically make this box a loss-leader to win customers over.  The cheaper the better.  It think it would tip it for many folks.

Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 8:00 PM, Steve W said:

Nah, just the continuing persistent rumor. Since they just announced new stuff last week I'd expect the next set of rumors before Sun 'n Fun. and then we can all be disappointed still.

Expand  

Sales rep says to expect Wednesday. 
 

-Robert 

Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 6:51 PM, MIm20c said:

I’m curious what owners are willing to pay for this converter box.  Garmin and aspen both have D/A boxes for the lateral navigation in the $700-$1k range. They also currently have boxes that output attitude info in the $3k range (only G500 and txi for Garmin). 
 

Are owners looking for a $1k, $2k, or a $3k converter box to work with the G5?

Expand  

I know nothing is "easy" when it comes to tech but if the GAD43e can take info from the 500txi and convert into an analogue signal how much tougher could it really be for the G5?  As I've said previously, these king autopilots are all going to go eventually and if you already have a G5 and all of the other Garmin toys it's only inevitable that you'll be buying the GFC500.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 9:02 PM, Davidv said:

I know nothing is "easy" when it comes to tech but if the GAD43e can take info from the 500txi and convert into an analogue signal how much tougher could it really be for the G5?  As I've said previously, these king autopilots are all going to go eventually and if you already have a G5 and all of the other Garmin toys it's only inevitable that you'll be buying the GFC500.

Expand  

This !

.  If Garmin never makes the g5 work with legacy autopilots, when my AP goes, I will likely seek any and all non Garmin solutions...  Likely the Dynon.  That is looking like it will be available this year, and not only do you get an autopilot be a really nice EFIS display.

That being said, If I was rocking 2 g5's and my AP went bad, the GFC 5/600 would probably be a savings over the dynon and I would go with that.

They really have been foolish by not doing this from the get go... You can bet that EVER SINGLE aspen installation you see was a missed sale of 2 G5's + the non existent converter box. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 10:00 PM, Austintatious said:

This !

.  If Garmin never makes the g5 work with legacy autopilots, when my AP goes, I will likely seek any and all non Garmin solutions...  Likely the Dynon.  That is looking like it will be available this year, and not only do you get an autopilot be a really nice EFIS display.

That being said, If I was rocking 2 g5's and my AP went bad, the GFC 5/600 would probably be a savings over the dynon and I would go with that.

They really have been foolish by not doing this from the get go... You can bet that EVER SINGLE aspen installation you see was a missed sale of 2 G5's.

Expand  

Exactly, I got quoted an extra $6k to install an EA100 including parts.  So with labor I'm spending around $20K to put in an aspen and EA100 and I still have an autopilot from 30 years ago in the plane.   With the other options at the moment, no thanks.

  • Like 1
Posted

The issue, as explained to me was that the G5 was developed for the experimental market so integration, etc is difficult.  However, I think Garmin may have been surprised at the response to the certified version of the G5. I believe part of the announcement is a made-for-certified product that is designed for these types of things.

 

-Robert

Posted

The G5 filled a very nice niche between "overhauled vacuum based instruments" and the Aspen

Nothing against the Aspen but too much $$$ for I am looking for (personal preference).  Install and  ACU costs  are big hurdles

Posted
  On 1/14/2020 at 10:00 PM, Austintatious said:

This !

.  If Garmin never makes the g5 work with legacy autopilots, when my AP goes, I will likely seek any and all non Garmin solutions...  Likely the Dynon.  That is looking like it will be available this year, and not only do you get an autopilot be a really nice EFIS display.

That being said, If I was rocking 2 g5's and my AP went bad, the GFC 5/600 would probably be a savings over the dynon and I would go with that.

They really have been foolish by not doing this from the get go... You can bet that EVER SINGLE aspen installation you see was a missed sale of 2 G5's + the non existent converter box. 

Expand  

Well said.  My position exactly.

Posted

I think part of the problem here is that the G5 (and g3x touch, GFC500, etc) was developed with CANBUS technology which really isn’t backwards compatible with analog auto pilots. CANBUS send messages along a common bus line to other boxes in the network which decode the message and that does the action. It allows you to do all of these functions with a three wire pair. This has been the standard for automobiles for a few years now, but there’s not really a solution to break it out into analog left or right outputs  with no feedback. 

Posted
  On 1/15/2020 at 2:32 AM, jetdriven said:

I think part of the problem here is that the G5 (and g3x touch, GFC500, etc) was developed with CANBUS technology which really isn’t backwards compatible with analog auto pilots. CANBUS send messages along a common bus line to other boxes in the network which decode the message and that does the action. It allows you to do all of these functions with a three wire pair. This has been the standard for automobiles for a few years now, but there’s not really a solution to break it out into analog left or right outputs  with no feedback. 

Expand  

The can bus has nothing to do with it. They output analog guidance signals for the AP DG using the GAD29B. They could easily make a box that would output the analog signals to drive the legacy APs. It is not a technical issue. It is a business and/or regulatory issue.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.