Oldguy Posted March 27, 2019 Report Posted March 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, ArtVandelay said: This is were my J is different I think: Both cowl flaps are the type with contouring for the muffler, I obviously only have the muffler on the right side, so even with cowl flaps fully close, there is opening for airflow. Anyone with a J have this? Tom Now that is different. What S/N is your J? Quote
ArtVandelay Posted March 27, 2019 Report Posted March 27, 2019 There was a change at 1615, but they don’t show the difference.Tom Quote
KSMooniac Posted March 27, 2019 Report Posted March 27, 2019 Re: reversed air flow under the cowl...one time when I had the bracket at the back/top of the engine that supports the baffling loose, I neglected to tighten the nut and of course it leaked a little bit of oil. I didn't notice until enough came forward, out of the cowl, and onto the windscreen! I never thought of using oil as a tell-tale for adjusting the cowl flaps, but now I think it might be a fun experiment...Sent from my LG-US996 using Tapatalk Quote
Bob_Belville Posted March 27, 2019 Report Posted March 27, 2019 FWIW, I was by @AGL Aviationtoday. Lynn had a PFS exhaust disassembled on a worktable. He pointed out a small crack inside the junction of the headers. The PFS is off a flying school's C172 and has 2200 hours without any cost except inspections. The new part, which is essentially the whole guts of the system is $1200. (The headers are fine as is the tailpipe and heater shroud. I asked Lynn if he'd ever mic'd the wall thickness of the headers. "Yes, it is double that of conventional muffler systems.") If that's typical, $1200 over 2200 hours, I suppose the PFS system is cost competitive with conventional systems without appeal to performance (speed/HP) or CO safety considerations. 2 Quote
Prior owner Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 I don’t think I ever saw a weight given for the PFS- anybody know? Quote
Bob_Belville Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 7 hours ago, PilotCoyote said: I don’t think I ever saw a weight given for the PFS- anybody know? Just checked the W&B calculation for my E. Old exhaust -17.0 pounds @ -5.5" arm; PFS +20.0 pounds @ -4.5" arm. 1 Quote
Culver LFA Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 16 hours ago, Bob_Belville said: He pointed out a small crack inside the junction of the headers. The PFS is off a flying school's C172 and has 2200 hours without any cost except inspections. The new part, which is essentially the whole guts of the system is $1200. 2200 hrs is pretty good but let’s not be frivolous here, are they replacing the part rather than repairing/welding the crack? Once repaired that system should be good for another 2000 hrs! Quote
orionflt Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 my system has been on since 92, the baffles are gone and its time to replace it. I am bouncing back and forth between a knisley and power flow Brian Quote
Culver LFA Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 10 hours ago, PilotCoyote said: I don’t think I ever saw a weight given for the PFS- anybody know? Weights from the installation manual for each version and optional equipment. 1 Quote
DXB Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 3 hours ago, orionflt said: my system has been on since 92, the baffles are gone and its time to replace it. I am bouncing back and forth between a knisley and power flow Brian My 21 year old 2000 hr knisley exhaust probably should be replaced in the next couple of years. Can’t decide whether I want Knisley again vs powerflow - particularly given the rumored performance gain of the knisley may negate the value added of switching to powerflow. I’d be curious to hear of your experience, particularly if you go Knisley. Quote
orionflt Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 1 minute ago, DXB said: My 21 year old 2000 hr knisley exhaust probably should be replaced in the next couple of years. Can’t decide whether I want Knisley again vs powerflow - particularly given the rumored performance gain of the knisley may negate the value added of switching to powerflow. I’d be curious to hear of your experience, particularly if you go Knisley. that is the same dilemma too, if knisley performs as well as powerflow, why spend the extra money. Quote
ArtVandelay Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 33 minutes ago, DXB said: My 21 year old 2000 hr knisley exhaust probably should be replaced in the next couple of years. Can’t decide whether I want Knisley again vs powerflow - particularly given the rumored performance gain of the knisley may negate the value added of switching to powerflow. I’d be curious to hear of your experience, particularly if you go Knisley. Can you post a picture of your exhaust, especially the tailpipe? Quote
DXB Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) @ArtVandelayNot a great pic, but here's the end of my tail pipe last year after it started to disintegrate and had to be replaced. The full exhaust looks exactly like pictured on the Knisley website. Edited March 28, 2019 by DXB 1 Quote
Bob_Belville Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 4 hours ago, Culver LFA said: 2200 hrs is pretty good but let’s not be frivolous here, are they replacing the part rather than repairing/welding the crack? Once repaired that system should be good for another 2000 hrs! They replaced the part. I did not ask about whether welding is an option on the PFS. 1 Quote
Bob_Belville Posted March 28, 2019 Report Posted March 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, DXB said: @ArtVandelayNot a great pic, but here's the end of my tail pipe last year after it started to disintegrate and had to be replaced. That looks familiar. I left a big chunk of tailpipe somewhere between Atlanta and home a couple of months into ownership of the plane. The muffler guts were mostly missing as well and the flanges on the headers had been welded before. That occasioned the new PFS. 1 Quote
DXB Posted March 31, 2019 Report Posted March 31, 2019 36 minutes ago, AlexLev said: No PowerFlow for me: You might not want to use your Sensorcon monitor for a few months. If it registers a few ppm CO after the replacement, the frustration might be difficult to handle 1 Quote
AlexLev Posted March 31, 2019 Author Report Posted March 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, DXB said: You might not want to use your Sensorcon monitor for a few months. If it registers a few ppm CO after the replacement, the frustration might be difficult to handle Checked it yesterday. 0ppm in cruise again. Quote
AlexLev Posted April 1, 2019 Author Report Posted April 1, 2019 Embarrassing update: wanted to re-torque the bolts after the A&P bolted on the exhaust (after flying it) and instead of using 150 in lbs, used 150 ft lbs and broke off on the left rear exhaust stack/riser. Hope someone learns from my mistake. @Shadrach or @M20Doc: curious if you have any ideas for how to work that out without damaging the cylinder? I'll be working with an A&P as well, but wondering if any of you have any experience on working that remaining stud out. I feel really dumb See pics: Quote
MARZ Posted April 1, 2019 Report Posted April 1, 2019 removing that exhaust riser may give you enough of the broken stud to remove successfully. Luckily it wasn't the inboard stud. consider one of these - DO NOT give into the temptation to try a vice grips...... https://www.amazon.com/Powerbuilt-648639-Stud-Extractor/dp/B002INQORU https://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/kd-tools-studs-camshaft-style-stud-remover-1-4-to-3-4-kdt1708/22988109-P https://www.grainger.com/product/36T852?gclid=Cj0KCQjw7YblBRDFARIsAKkK-dK8jtIH7yButDfQ1s2-8HfffLi-48GFWwo3SBzmNuhmsP7m2QlF2qsaAtpsEALw_wcB&cm_mmc=PPC:+Google+PLA&ef_id=Cj0KCQjw7YblBRDFARIsAKkK-dK8jtIH7yButDfQ1s2-8HfffLi-48GFWwo3SBzmNuhmsP7m2QlF2qsaAtpsEALw_wcB:G:s&s_kwcid=AL!2966!3!50916684477!!!g!66418499839! As a last resort one can place a nut - oversize in some cases - and weld the nut to the stud. But that's for someone who KNOWS how to weld. Misplacement of the ground lead can be more damaging to the engine than the broken stud. 2 Quote
MIm20c Posted April 2, 2019 Report Posted April 2, 2019 If you gradually tightened the other ones in a star pattern well above the value you might want to change those as well. I admire your strength, I have to strain a fair bit to get my car lug nuts to 105 ft lbs. Quote
AlexLev Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Posted April 2, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, MIm20c said: If you gradually tightened the other ones in a star pattern well above the value you might want to change those as well. I admire your strength, I have to strain a fair bit to get my car lug nuts to 105 ft lbs. Luckily, I didn't touch the other ones w/a torque wrench and they are not at all close. Thanks for the advice so far. Edited April 2, 2019 by AlexLev Quote
Shadrach Posted April 2, 2019 Report Posted April 2, 2019 (edited) @AlexLev I would have to agree with @MARZ that the best course of action is removing the riser and going after the stud. Call your A&P and come clean... He can help you tack weld a nut to to what's remaining of the stud as I don't think there's enough there to lock two nuts together. He'll likely take pity on you. You will need him for the re installation of the riser after the stud is replaced. Edited April 2, 2019 by Shadrach 1 Quote
Marauder Posted April 2, 2019 Report Posted April 2, 2019 Embarrassing update: wanted to re-torque the bolts after the A&P bolted on the exhaust (after flying it) and instead of using 150 in lbs, used 150 ft lbs and broke off on the left rear exhaust stack/riser. Hope someone learns from my mistake. [mention=8069]Shadrach[/mention] or [mention=12030]M20Doc[/mention]: curious if you have any ideas for how to work that out without damaging the cylinder? I'll be working with an A&P as well, but wondering if any of you have any experience on working that remaining stud out. I feel really dumb See pics: What happened to that stud is exactly what happened to me. Except I wasn’t the guy who overtightened it but I was the guy sitting in the plane at 8000’ over low IMC when the stud finally cracked and the piece fell off. With the stud/nut gone, it took about 2 minutes for the other nut to vibrate off and the entire riser to fall into the lower cowling. After completing an unscheduled landing, the field I landed at was able to get the remaining stud out. Hopefully you only torqued this one this much. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.