Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quote: jax88

Is there a limit to the number of overhauls you are comfortable with?  At some point, do you just replace an engine because of total hours?

Posted

My 1964 "E" had about 5600 hours when I sold it, and had never had an engine overhaul.


It was, however, on its fourth factory-new engine when she flew off with her new owner.  


My current "C" has 600 hours on a factory-new engine.  


So, I my anwer on how many overhauls is -- zero.


 

Posted

There is a lot to be considered in this. Do you like to run your engine at max power or pull it back and go for endurance at LOP settings. Your engine have the doweled cases? If you like to fly it like you stole it you are more likely to need to have some case surfacing done. At a certain point this will get more complicated as the machining changes the spacing and therefore the backlash of the accessory case gears.  Lycon has an STC to install a strip of O-ring material on the case flange to seal it. They claim that this is better for long term engine life as the flanges don't have to be machined as much to allow for the silk thread and non hardening sealer to function. That also cuts down of having to line bore the main  and camshaft bearing bosses to maintain tolerances. Running past TBO can be a factor too as running things with loose tolerances can speed up wear at some points and just invites running until something breaks. 

Posted

There is always an unknown factor too, like Lycoming introducing the new roller tappets. How bad do you want those if at all? I don't hink we will know for a while yet if they are really better or just a marketing point. One thing is for sure they do run up the price of a prop strike or overhaul since the tappets are on the mandatory replacement list. How long will the old configuration be available?  Dual mags are history for right now so will it become necessary to convert to two single mags or not?  Hard to know what will come along. Changes in fuel could mean big changes in cylinder head configurations and serviceability.

Posted

Quote: jerry-N5911Q

My 1964 "E" had about 5600 hours when I sold it, and had never had an engine overhaul.

It was, however, on its fourth factory-new engine when she flew off with her new owner.  

My current "C" has 600 hours on a factory-new engine.  

So, I my anwer on how many overhauls is -- zero.

 

Posted

Randy,


Just curious where you got your quotes from.  Air Power Inc. has Textron Rebuilt at $28,200 and Textron Factory Overhaul at $25,200.  I've seen other quotes for field overhauls at less than $20,000.  All of these are for the standard IO-360-A1A. 


Not offering any advice on this shop, but J.B Aircraft in Florida offers free labor for removal and installation if the aircraft is brought to their shop (just going off what is on their website) and the prices for overhaul are there too.  http://www.jbaircraftengines.com/

Posted

Quote: jerry-N5911Q

My 1964 "E" had about 5600 hours when I sold it, and had never had an engine overhaul.

It was, however, on its fourth factory-new engine when she flew off with her new owner.  

My current "C" has 600 hours on a factory-new engine.  

So, I my anwer on how many overhauls is -- zero.

 

Posted

Well, that's part of my shopping equation for sure.  I want to have an idea of what I'm getting into before I take the plunge.  It looks as if the overhaul costs for the 6 cylinder TSIO-360-M* is roughly $5,000 more than that of the 4 cylinder IO-360.  I'm adding a top overhaul to the operating costs of the TSIO-360 as well.

Posted

There are a number of good reasons not to go with the Echelon STC. $3000.00 cylinders is one. According to sources who might not like to be named (a Lycoming service center) The 390 is a result of boring a 360 jug to the max. It's not being approved to recondition or chrome the cylinders and there are none in the system anyway since very few of these engines are in service. I'm told that 210 HP is not hard to get out of an IO-360 with good valve machining techniques and a very light touch in the ports. An O-360 in an experimental configuration is claimed to be easier to get up past 210 hp and is more reliable in that application because the flat topped pistons don't have the valve pockets that can get hot at the edges and cause detonation-pre-ignition.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.