Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not a great weekend, we lost a local pilot when his Zenair 601 crashed into a forest.

Clarence

Posted
1 hour ago, M20Doc said:

Not a great weekend, we lost a local pilot when his Zenair 601 crashed into a forest.

Clarence

3 were lost lost and one criticaly injured over the week end in Quebec : one glider pilot was lost in a stall-spin accident landing in Bromont Qc on saturday , 2 were lost and one criticaly injured in a Cessna crash over the northeastern side of the province yesterday afternoon . 

Posted
11 hours ago, mike_elliott said:

If anyone learns of the contact info for the surviving families, please let me know.

TIA

Mike

You could start by contacting Airmods.  They probably took care of this bird if it was based on the field.

Prayers to all.

-Seth

 

Posted
11 hours ago, mike_elliott said:

If anyone learns of the contact info for the surviving families, please let me know.

TIA

Mike

You could start by contacting Airmods.  They probably took care of this bird if it was based on the field.

Prayers to all.

-Seth

 

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, 201er said:

I'd be hard pressed to go into sky manor with 3 on board (full size adults). Not only is that runway 2900ft but it's got trees on one end and high power lines on the other. There's no shallow glide path into it from either direction so a tailwind would be devastating. You guys never see me getting gas there. First off cause I don't take the burrito and secondly cause I don't want to be anything more than 200lbs under gross. And even then it's a pretty teeth clenching departure where you familiarize yourself with all the local fauna. Landing there is tough but I can see how going around could be even more of a problem. 

I fly over there for lunch often and we've had many Mooney fly ins there. The airport manager himself keeps his Mooney there. So this hits close to home on so many levels.

As Mike states this is good conservative advice. I've flown into this airport many times over the years and I am always struck with how undulating the runway is particularly as one lands on 25. This exacerbates any excess airspeed as you can actually skip over segments further extending the landing and leading to the dreaded pogo effect. This is one of those one bounce and go places which leaves no room to salvage poor technique.

Edited by Cris
  • Like 2
Posted

Sorry to hear of this.  It is especially difficult to see a Mooney down and crumpled with the loss of life.  Thoughts are with the family and friends of those lost.  Fly safe everyone.

Posted
9 hours ago, Marauder said:

As Mike (201er) pointed out, the winds were shifting a bit today. I experienced a pretty wind shift on my takeoff this afternoon. Sad to read this thread...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I came into KILG around that time after 6 hours of flying, just before touchdown my plane went a little nose up and I glided at least 1000 ft before touchdown if I were going into the short strip after the first go round I would have landed elsewhere, I figured I was tired, but a few guys landing around that time mentioned  wasn't that fun. Many times those pretty days are the most challenging. The wind at KILG at 1000 ft showed a head wind of about 10 knots, at DH I was showing a tail wind of 5 knots, as Mike/Chris said it was shifty.

 

Jeez that does suck.

Posted

What we know:

Pilot rented a Mooney, loaded it almost to the gills and attempted to fly into Sky Manor. Probably not the most straightforward approach and landing as has been described. Resulted in loss of control of the airplane and along with it two lives and possibly a third.

Questions that come to mind: When do we, (as in we collectively in GA), look and scrutinize closely at who can rent what airplane? When do we seriously look at currency, total time, and time in type? When do we look at our pilot training model and see if it can be improved? Do we need desperately to be discussing this or am I overreacting? Does anyone with a ppl and a checkout have the right to rent an airplane and go? Would it be an infringement on our freedom to ask some hard questions?

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PTK said:

What we know:

Pilot rented a Mooney, loaded it almost to the gills and attempted to fly into Sky Manor. Probably not the most straightforward approach and landing as has been described. Resulted in loss of control of the airplane and along with it two lives and possibly a third.

Questions that come to mind: When do we, (as in we collectively in GA), look and scrutinize closely at who can rent what airplane? When do we seriously look at currency, total time, and time in type? When do we look at our pilot training model and see if it can be improved? Do we need desperately to be discussing this or am I overreacting? Does anyone with a ppl and a checkout have the right to rent an airplane and go? Would it be an infringement on our freedom to ask some hard questions?

 

 

Most of the places I know that rent airplanes will not just rent it to anyone walking thru the door. they have a check out process even for a 172

Brian 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, PTK said:

What we know:

Pilot rented a Mooney, loaded it almost to the gills and attempted to fly into Sky Manor. Probably not the most straightforward approach and landing as has been described. Resulted in loss of control of the airplane and along with it two lives and possibly a third.

Questions that come to mind: When do we, (as in we collectively in GA), look and scrutinize closely at who can rent what airplane? When do we seriously look at currency, total time, and time in type? When do we look at our pilot training model and see if it can be improved? Do we need desperately to be discussing this or am I overreacting? Does anyone with a ppl and a checkout have the right to rent an airplane and go? Would it be an infringement on our freedom to ask some hard questions?

 

 

I looked up his License he is legally qualified to fly this plane, end of story....NO WE DON"T need more regulation......Just be thankful the mistakes you have made in the cockpit have not killed you..... I know I am...

 

  • Like 15
Posted

Regulation is a tough word, I do  believe the owner of the rental plane should do there due diligence in the renting of the plane it should include some of the items Peter mentioned.

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Alan Fox said:

I looked up his License he is legally qualified to fly this plane, end of story....NO WE DON"T need more regulation......Just be thankful the mistakes you have made in the cockpit have not killed you..... I know I am...

 

So if we look closely at "legally qualified" vs. "qualified" it would be viewed as too much regulation? I respect people's opinion. How about if we try and start a discussion anyway. And try to get away from labeling it "overregulation." Let's think outside the box and let's not be afraid to start talking about it. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Danb said:

Regulation is a tough word, I do  believe the owner of the rental plane should do there due diligence in the renting of the plane it should include some of the items Peter mentioned.

You think owners don't do this already? I remember trying to rent planes prior to owning, and it seemed like every time I was at a new FBO, I basically had to do a full BFR before getting approved to rent.

  • Like 3
Posted

Directed towards the comments about pilot qualifications -- the FAA has already identified an area of risk and changed the PTS to address it. It is a shift from the technical skills of being a pilot towards the decision making involved in being a pilot.

I don't think there is one of us who hasn't made a poor decision. Where we got lucky was the end result of that decision didn't do us in.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
I came into KILG around that time after 6 hours of flying, just before touchdown my plane went a little nose up and I glided at least 1000 ft before touchdown if I were going into the short strip after the first go round I would have landed elsewhere, I figured I was tired, but a few guys landing around that time mentioned  wasn't that fun. Many times those pretty days are the most challenging. The wind at KILG at 1000 ft showed a head wind of about 10 knots, at DH I was showing a tail wind of 5 knots, as Mike/Chris said it was shifty.
 
Jeez that does suck.


I noted the wind shifts on my Aspen as well. As much 120 degrees at different altitudes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posted
4 minutes ago, mike_elliott said:

If anyone learns of how to contact Karen's or George's families, please let me know.

TIA

Mike

I think its best to let them grieve in peace ,

Posted

Sky Manor , (or sky manure) as we like to call it , is in an area of rolling hills , and it is hard to really get  good visual cues as to your altitude , and the field altitude , also coupled with the power lines at the end of the prevailing runway , it is easy to come in steep and fast , If you are not precise with airspeed control , it is easy to come in hot........ I have been there probably a hundred times , and still almost always use the whole runway.....

Posted
10 minutes ago, Alan Fox said:

Sky Manor , (or sky manure) as we like to call it , is in an area of rolling hills , and it is hard to really get  good visual cues as to your altitude , and the field altitude , also coupled with the power lines at the end of the prevailing runway , it is easy to come in steep and fast , If you are not precise with airspeed control , it is easy to come in hot........ I have been there probably a hundred times , and still almost always use the whole runway.....

 

1 hour ago, gsxrpilot said:

You think owners don't do this already? I remember trying to rent planes prior to owning, and it seemed like every time I was at a new FBO, I basically had to do a full BFR before getting approved to rent.

Sooooo... back to my original question: When do we, (as in we collectively in GA), look and scrutinize closely at who can rent what airplane? When do we seriously look at currency, total time, and time in type? When do we look at our pilot training model and see if it can be improved?

Or if someone had a checkout is considered "legally qualified" and we hand them the keys? God forbid we risk being accused of favoring overregulation!

Did the innocent pax have any input in the decision making process? If saving lives means "overregulation" than I'm all for it!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.