Jump to content

VOR/GS Antenna


Recommended Posts

Similar problems on both NavComs in my 65E indicate Antenna problem.  I have been advised to replace old cat whisker antenna with new that includes integrated balun.  Any suggestions on replacement or equipment?  Comant replacement says elements not removable, but my install requires element removal to mount old cover.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nav and Comm radios use different antennas.  Your post mentions both.   From your post I gather that your problem is with the Nav side of both radios?   More detail will help others understand your problem.

There are multiple possible points of failure in the Nav antenna system.   Since  you have two radios, there is a splitter that divides the signal from the Nav antenna to both Nav radios and both GS receivers if both your Nav receivers have GS.   That splitter can fail.   Coax connections are another possible failure mode.  Then the antenna.  I wouldn't assume right away that it is your antenna unless you have some reason to believe that it is.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recommend using the multimeter to measure the continuity of the antenna wire all the way to the antenna. I tracked VOR cable continuity all the way to the bottom tail section, but couldn’t access the connection to the VOR whiskers antenna. To the board: How do you remove the VOR whiskers from Vertical stabilizer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ukrsindicat@yahoo.com said:

I recommend using the multimeter to measure the continuity of the antenna wire all the way to the antenna. I tracked VOR cable continuity all the way to the bottom tail section, but couldn’t access the connection to the VOR whiskers antenna. To the board: How do you remove the VOR whiskers from Vertical stabilizer?

If you are just checking DC continuity, just check to the antenna itself (I'm pretty sure the VOR whiskers are bare metal).  If no continuity, and you've already checked to the base of the tail, then you can start taking things apart.  Or, maybe I misread and you've already done this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MikeOH said:

If you are just checking DC continuity, just check to the antenna itself (I'm pretty sure the VOR whiskers are bare metal).  If no continuity, and you've already checked to the base of the tail, then you can start taking things apart.  Or, maybe I misread and you've already done this.

I was doing tail connector to antenna bare metal and was getting 5 OHM, not sure if its good.

Sorry for hijacking the the thread, but I hope this will also help the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2022 at 10:38 AM, Steve65E-NC said:

Similar problems on both NavComs in my 65E indicate Antenna problem.  I have been advised to replace old cat whisker antenna with new that includes integrated balun.  Any suggestions on replacement or equipment?  Comant replacement says elements not removable, but my install requires element removal to mount old cover.  

Bypass the antenna splitter and connect directly to the coax pigtail on the individual nav radios to isolate your issue.

Clarence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ukrsindicat@yahoo.com said:

I was doing tail connector to antenna bare metal and was getting 5 OHM, not sure if its good.

Are you measuring from the center conductor to ground, or the outer shell on the connector? The outer should be low, like 5 ohms. Inner to ground should be open; if low, that’s a problem. Inner to antenna should be low. All of these should be done with the coax disconnected at the radio.

Really, a DC check like this is only going to find gross problems. Short or open. Proper feedline/antenna testing requires special test equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ukrsindicat@yahoo.com said:

 How do you remove the VOR whiskers from Vertical stabilizer?

Remove the sheet metal cover and remove the two screws with a right angle screw driver. They may be so rusted that you need to cut the heads off, raise the puck up and cut the screws off. Then work the screws out with pliers. It can be a real PITA.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2022 at 8:40 AM, MikeOH said:

Are you measuring from the center conductor to ground, or the outer shell on the connector? The outer should be low, like 5 ohms. Inner to ground should be open; if low, that’s a problem. Inner to antenna should be low. All of these should be done with the coax disconnected at the radio.

Really, a DC check like this is only going to find gross problems. Short or open. Proper feedline/antenna testing requires special test equipment.

 

IMG_5607.JPG.11dc4daea3a31b3a3022631077e54684.JPG

Above I connected security camera wire from Lowes to the bottom connector just so I can troubleshoot the line to antenna.

 

IMG_5610.JPG.d4ae7d837cab01a660a1fbf5ba351551.JPG

Strangely enough, the reading of 5 OHM was indicated when I was measuring the outer contact of antenna wire and the whisker booms of VOR anthena. I was expecting that the inner contact of antenna wire was connected to the antenna booms. Odd...IMG_5608.JPG.6b3e871778cd93f3050390a7655aed59.JPG

Again, I'm hopping my questions are also helping the OP and I'm not just high-jacking the thread.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MikeOH said:

I'm not sure what I'm seeing.  What is that zip cord with the purple and red ends?  The measurements should be directly to the coax BNC that is exiting the tail.

You are correct that the inner conductor of THAT connector should be low resistance to the antenna.  The outer should have a good connection to the metal airframe.

Not necessarily. It should have good continuity to one of the radiators of the dipole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this installation has the usual "folded cable" balun (old school), which was kind of standard practice for many, many years on VOR antennas, then the outer conductor (shield) should show low resistance to the exposed part of either whisker, so that's okay.    It's also okay that there is high resistance to the center conductor, because in that type of balun it isn't directly connected to anything, the signal is induced by the shield connection in the balun.

It's also okay if the resistance from the shield to aircraft ground is low.    That seems wrong, but it is actually proper for the shield to be connected to the aircraft frame (ground) and the antenna elements, and the center conductor to be floating (not connected) at the antenna.

It sounds like that's what you're describing, if I understand correctly, so you may be okay.  

Screen Shot 2019-11-29 at 10.41.38 PM.png

Edited by EricJ
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, N201MKTurbo said:

Not necessarily. It should have good continuity to one of the radiators of the dipole.

Ah, good point!  I wasn't thinking dipole. I deleted my post; bad info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric is right on the money!

An antenna is a device to match 377 Ohm impedance of the free space (air is close to free space) to 50 Ohm impedance of the RF cable. That balun is needed to convert balanced (antenna) to unbalanced (cable) load. Both are never perfect, but sort of work in a range of frequencies: around 100-120 MHz in our case.

Look carefully at the picture that Eric attached. The balun is tuned to our frequency. Homework for you: what is the wavelength of 110 MHz. The wavelength is denoted as lambda in the picture.

Two shields are electrically connected at the bottom of the loop and connected to the airframe ground. What often happens, the solder used on the wire there gets old and shields loose good connection or/and good connection to the ground. The antenna is dead! Unfortunately, you can not detect it measuring DC resistance. You need a vector network analyzer. You can also visually inspect the cable if you can get to it.

Also, as somebody mentioned, the corroded connectors will cause the impedance mismatch. This will create a reflection point for radio wave. It is possible to loose almost all signal this way as well. So, check and clean all the connectors in the way.

Once you calculate that lambda, you realize that it is pretty long. That means, the wave will not even notice a gap in your wire. Theoretically, you might have zero DC conductivity, but the antenna/cable will still work fine. Welcome to the magic world of RF :)

Vik

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, vik said:

Welcome to the magic world of RF :)

Vik

 

BLACK magic world of RF!  /FIFY

My dad is an RF whiz in the broadcast industry, and absolutely none of it rubbed off on me.  I'm a structures nerd and needed chicken bones and eyes of newt to pass my circuits class for non EE in college.

Thanks for the good explanation.  I'm about to embark on NAV antenna replacement myself to bury in my new wingtips and hopefully it will work if I can follow instructions. 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We checked continuity from coax outer to each element.  One was zero.  Pulled antenna and discovered broken #4 bolt that goes from eyelet, through Bakelite, to element.   Started to remove unit, balun, and coax, but decided that was a bad move and that unit could be repaired with it just pulled up and out.  Had to remove a few cable constraints at bottom to get some extra coax length.  Tied a rope on to be sure not to loose end but did not have to go that far.    Replaced broken bolt and lock nuts, inspected balun and assembly, dielectric grease on electrical connections and Anti Seize on mounting bolts, checked continuity, and put it back together.  Flight tested fine.  Diagram of cable assembly presented here was the key and extremely helpful. Thanks.  Balun was tucked into space at top of fin above antenna and went back in easily.  Removing two mounting bolts without messing up coax was futzy but doable with care and box/open end wrench.  Airframe ground at bottom of balun went to the front mounting bolt.  Might be best to tape on a towel or paper to avoid dangling parts scratching fin paint. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.