Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys! It’s me again with another question. The induction air boot is torn in my 1965 C model and it looks bad. Lasar has one for E and F model (600115-005) and my part number is 600115-3. Are those interchangable?

 

MJ

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Jamildmc said:

Hi guys! It’s me again with another question. The induction air boot is torn in my 1965 C model and it looks bad. Lasar has one for E and F model (600115-005) and my part number is 600115-3. Are those interchangable?

MJ

 

LASAR did a group buy of the B/C/D/G intake duct a couple years ago.  Here’s a screenshot from an email at the time.

image.png.62f3123c3e0a38633c1faa4b2dfe627a.png 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, 47U said:

 

LASAR did a group buy of the B/C/D/G intake duct a couple years ago.  Here’s a screenshot from an email at the time.

image.png.62f3123c3e0a38633c1faa4b2dfe627a.png 

 

In one word- NO

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I reached out to LASAR, Texas air salvage and Frank at Mooney. Sounds like 600064-000 is the one that LASAR recommends for a C model and said that the 600115-005 was only for E and Fs. Mooney said differently. Frank wrote that the 600115-005 is a replacement for -3. Texas air salvage also said the same thing. I hope this helps everybody.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMG_9053.png
Posted
1 hour ago, Jamildmc said:

I reached out to LASAR, Texas air salvage and Frank at Mooney. Sounds like 600064-000 is the one that LASAR recommends for a C model and said that the 600115-005 was only for E and Fs. Mooney said differently. Frank wrote that the 600115-005 is a replacement for -3. Texas air salvage also said the same thing. I hope this helps everybody.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMG_9053.png

Are parts getting confused here. The 180hp is 600064-000. The 200hp 600115-005. It sounds like he said the 600115-005 can replace the 600115-003 not 600064-000

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Marc_B said:

or perhaps just didn't know of the notes on the drawing for the part.  When I spoke with Frank Crawford at Mooney a few years ago it sounded like a lot of the IPC's have been updated over the years and this would probably be one of them.  Depending on how far you go back, you might not catch the amendments.

But certainly points to owners needing to be just as educated as the shop where they're getting maintenance and what parts are being installed!

Just changed my post looking at the prev again. Seems parts are getting confused. I would expect them to be quite different 

Posted
2 hours ago, Jamildmc said:

I reached out to LASAR, Texas air salvage and Frank at Mooney. Sounds like 600064-000 is the one that LASAR recommends for a C model and said that the 600115-005 was only for E and Fs. Mooney said differently. Frank wrote that the 600115-005 is a replacement for -3. Texas air salvage also said the same thing. I hope this helps everybody.

Reading your above post… is there still some confusion here?  In your original post the question was…

On 1/23/2026 at 12:47 PM, Jamildmc said:

The induction air boot is torn in my 1965 C model and it looks bad. Lasar has one for E and F model (600115-005) and my part number is 600115-3. Are those interchangable?

If you have a 1965 C with the 180 hp Lycoming, the part number for your intake duct is 600064-000, not 600115-3.

I’m not sure how you arrived at pn 600115-3 as the intake duct for a C model, but that is not correct.  The E and F model use pn 600115-3 and -005.  Frank Crawford is correct, pn 600115-005 will replace pn 600115-3.  I think Frank misunderstood which model aircraft you had.

If your C model had its engine replaced under STC and removed the 180 hp Lycoming and installed the 200 hp Lycoming, and have had the front cowl modified or replaced per the STC, then that might be an instance where the pn 600115-3/-005 intake duct might be applicable because you have in effect modified your aircraft to be an E model.  I would have to review the STC or inspect an aircraft modified as such though to be certain.

  • Like 2
Posted

Will a 201 windshield mod change the intake? I am still learning about the plane and it’s a C model, 180 hp, 201 windshield mod. 6000115-3 was provided by the mechanic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
23 minutes ago, Jamildmc said:

Will a 201 windshield mod change the intake? I am still learning about the plane and it’s a C model, 180 hp, 201 windshield mod. 6000115-3 was provided by the mechanic.

No, the air intake is from the cowl, in front of the engine; the windshield is a couple of feet tailward from there.

Posted
No, the air intake is from the cowl, in front of the engine; the windshield is a couple of feet tailward from there.

How about the cowl speed mod?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jamildmc said:

How about the cowl speed mod?

If you have the guppy mouth closure, no effect. If you have a completely different cowl, maybe. My guppy mouth closure is below for reference. 

Screenshot_20260126_175615_Gallery.jpg.15519334f4fa2050bd590f2e916cf1e5.jpg

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jamildmc said:


How about the cowl speed mod?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Neither of those changes it.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Justin Schmidt said:

Can you get a Pic of your intake boot? 

I'll try to remember in the morning. ;)

Posted
1 hour ago, Jamildmc said:

6000115-3 was provided by the mechanic.

Well, he might have some E/F model experience and didn’t realize the difference between the O-360 and IO-360 intake system(?).

I hope he’s not learning ‘the Mooney way’ on your airplane.  Not saying it can’t be done, but it takes a while to figure things out.  Really, that applies to any airplane you don’t have experience on.  Plenty of stories here about mechanics learning, sometimes the hard way.  I hope he has access to gear preload tools… and knows how to use them.

Top Gun is based at KSCK.  They are very well regarded.  No insult intended towards your current A&P.

Posted
On 1/23/2026 at 3:47 PM, Jamildmc said:

 

Hi guys! It’s me again with another question. The induction air boot is torn in my 1965 C model and it looks bad. Lasar has one for E and F model (600115-005) and my part number is 600115-3. Are those interchangable?

 

MJ

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It is not the same part. They have very different intake designs.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 1/23/2026 at 2:47 PM, Jamildmc said:

Hi guys! It’s me again with another question. The induction air boot is torn in my 1965 C model and it looks bad. Lasar has one for E and F model (600115-005) and my part number is 600115-3. Are those interchangable?

Why do you say, "my part number is 600115-3"?  Did you see it on the boot currently installed or in the logs?  This is the source of the confusion because the Parts Catalog shows 600064-000 as the correct part for an M20C. (I see in your prior posts that you apparently have a RayJay turbo modification but that should not change your airbox and cowl.) The CG boots vs the EF boots are not remotely similar - the mounts are different - bolted plate vs slip on and strapped.   Doesn't yours look like the bottom picture?  

The Mooney Parts Catalogs are in the "Downloads" Section.....(see link/download at bottom)

 

Boot1.jpg.354171068b97243646f741840122ab1d.jpg

Boot2.jpg.0cb0bdb7af5383b7a3fae317a4332f54.jpg

Boot3.jpg.a8d8acae4c0969ebd88e1046a1dc7fb9.jpg

IMG_3893.jpg

 

Edited by 1980Mooney
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Hank said:

I'll try to remember in the morning. ;)

Sorry, it was too cold this morning to remove.and reinstall the cheek piece. It was up to 24° outside, but inside the hangar felt colder.

For what it's worth, mine looks like the one marked "C G" in @1980Mooney's post above. 

Digging through my phone, though, I did find these. Hope it helps!

20180705_100251.jpg.52b4393880abe13390b725d1b4cc8e2e.jpg

20180705_100335.jpg.2147795d6fb4a4df599294bf23bba333.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, Gee Bee Aeroproducts said:

If the print would be changed to silicone spec with nomex

You would never have to buy another, the Epdm rubber fails .

 

Possible to make as OPP? 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.