Piloto Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) The Federal Aviation Administration said the plane was a Cessna 335, which had just taken off from Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport. The plane was en route to Hilliard, a town in north Florida, the FAA said. https://www.local10.com/news/local/fort-lauderdale/small-plane-crashes-into-warehouse-sparking-fire-in-fort-lauderdale Like other twins on takeoff there is no assurance of overcoming an engine failure on takeoff. Unlike singles the chances of an engine failure on a twin are twice that of single. Not to mention near Vmc on takeoff/climb can impair controllability after engine failure. The C335 is very popular at KFXE for cargo and passengers to the Bahamas. José Edited December 2, 2018 by Piloto Quote
gsengle Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 Respectfully, nonsense. With proper training, a twin of this class is very controllable during an engine failure. The odds of total engine failure are vanishingly small. We don’t hear about all the twin engine failures or precautionary shut downs because they are usually non events. The Cessna twin I usually fly, Mooney owner here, has a stall speed higher than VMC. Love the Mooney, would love to have a twin for the load and safety. The twin issues are mostly training issues imho. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 4 Quote
Piloto Posted December 2, 2018 Author Report Posted December 2, 2018 A C130 four engine an a crew of four had the same outcome on takeoff. José https://media.defense.gov/2018/Nov/09/2002061699/-1/-1/0/180502-AMC-MUÑIZ AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, PUERTO RICO-WC-C130H-AIB-NARRATIVE REPORT.PDF Quote
gsengle Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 A C130 four engine an a crew of four had the same outcome on takeoff. José https://media.defense.gov/2018/Nov/09/2002061699/-1/-1/0/180502-AMC-MUÑIZ AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, PUERTO RICO-WC-C130H-AIB-NARRATIVE REPORT.PDF Anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy. I’ll refrain from posting all the light singles that went down this last month....Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
Guest Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 Interesting that the news says a smell of Jet fuel, a Cessna 335 is powered by TSIO520EB engines. Clarence Quote
gsengle Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 Interesting that the news says a smell of Jet fuel, a Cessna 335 is powered by TSIO520EB engines. Clarence Yeah that would take down all your engines, single or multi...Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
MB65E Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 It’s becoming more common. I know several owners that have had jet fuel in their aircraft. Also almost lost a DA900 in FL this summer. It had diesel exhaust fluid in the fuel. They lost 2 engines... -Matt Quote
Andy95W Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 5 hours ago, gsengle said: Yeah that would take down all your engines, single or multi... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Don’t tell Josè that. His Mooney is safer than a C-130. 1 Quote
Piloto Posted December 2, 2018 Author Report Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, gsengle said: Anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy. I’ll refrain from posting all the light singles that went down this last month.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Here are some historical facts: Before Lindberg flight cross the Atlantic on a single two twin engine planes were lost during the attempt. Amelia Earhart was the first solo woman to cross the Atlantic on her single engine Lockheed Vega but disappeared in her twin engine Electra when attempting to land on Howland island. 77 B737 crashes list http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/b737.htm A320 ditch in the Hudson river after takeoff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549 New FAA approved bird avoidance device https://www.amazon.com/Gardeneer-Dalen-RHO4-Scarecrow-Rotating/dp/B0000AX52C/ref=pd_lpo_vtph_86_bs_t_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp&psc=1&amp&refRID=N4HAEW8GSSH00GXPJQXS It installs on top of the nose like a hood ornament. José Edited December 2, 2018 by Piloto Quote
aviatoreb Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Piloto said: Here are some historical facts: Before Lindberg flight cross the Atlantic on a single two twin engine planes were lost during the attempt. Amelia Earhart was the first solo woman to cross the Atlantic on her single engine Lockheed Vega but disappeared in her twin engine Electra when attempting to land on Howland island. 77 B737 crashes list http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/b737.htm José That proves it. Nothing has changed since 1927 and you are right. I will never fly in a twin engine airplane again! Quote
Guest Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 I would venture a guess that almost ALL airplane crashes, gear up landing etc had a pilot onboard the plane at the time of the accident. This proves to me that pilots are the cause of all accidents. Clarence Quote
aviatoreb Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 26 minutes ago, M20Doc said: I would venture a guess that almost ALL airplane crashes, gear up landing etc had a pilot onboard the plane at the time of the accident. This proves to me that pilots are the cause of all accidents. Clarence And since your statement was true in 1927 that there were pilots on board, the cause of this problem started in 1927. Therefore something must have changed in the pilot population in 1927 to have caused them to become problems. 1 Quote
kpaul Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 26 minutes ago, M20Doc said: I would venture a guess that almost ALL airplane crashes, gear up landing etc had a pilot onboard the plane at the time of the accident. This proves to me that pilots are the cause of all accidents. Clarence Doc, close... but what about paper airplanes, remote control airplanes, and even autonomous aircraft? It can't be only because of pilots...lets blame the lack of a pilot relief tube Quote
Andy95W Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 Unlike most threads, this one didn’t turn out stupid. It started that way. 3 4 Quote
gsengle Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 Here are some historical facts: Before Lindberg flight cross the Atlantic on a single two twin engine planes were lost during the attempt. Amelia Earhart was the first solo woman to cross the Atlantic on her single engine Lockheed Vega but disappeared in her twin engine Electra when attempting to land on Howland island. 77 B737 crashes list http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/b737.htm A320 ditch in the Hudson river after takeoff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549 New FAA approved bird avoidance device https://www.amazon.com/Gardeneer-Dalen-RHO4-Scarecrow-Rotating/dp/B0000AX52C/ref=pd_lpo_vtph_86_bs_t_1?_encoding=UTF8&&psc=1&&refRID=N4HAEW8GSSH00GXPJQXS It installs on top of the nose like a hood ornament. José That proves for an endurance test where you’re willing to risk your life, that a single is more efficient...Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote
kpaul Posted December 2, 2018 Report Posted December 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Piloto said: Here are some historical facts: Before Lindberg flight cross the Atlantic on a single two twin engine planes were lost during the attempt. Amelia Earhart was the first solo woman to cross the Atlantic on her single engine Lockheed Vega but disappeared in her twin engine Electra when attempting to land on Howland island. 77 B737 crashes list http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/b737.htm A320 ditch in the Hudson river after takeoff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549 New FAA approved bird avoidance device https://www.amazon.com/Gardeneer-Dalen-RHO4-Scarecrow-Rotating/dp/B0000AX52C/ref=pd_lpo_vtph_86_bs_t_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp&psc=1&amp&refRID=N4HAEW8GSSH00GXPJQXS It installs on top of the nose like a hood ornament. José Are you saying that the A320 that crashed into the Hudson would have not crashed if it were a single engine? And did you even read any of the information about the 737 crashes you posted? How many of them were caused because the aircraft had two engines instead of one? 1 Quote
Guest Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 2 hours ago, kpaul said: Doc, close... but what about paper airplanes, remote control airplanes, and even autonomous aircraft? It can't be only because of pilots...lets blame the lack of a pilot relief tube I stand corrected. Let me add that in your examples there still was a pilot involved in the flight, and many of these flights also end in disaster. Clarence Quote
Piloto Posted December 3, 2018 Author Report Posted December 3, 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, kpaul said: Are you saying that the A320 that crashed into the Hudson would have not crashed if it were a single engine? And did you even read any of the information about the 737 crashes you posted? How many of them were caused because the aircraft had two engines instead of one? Piston single engines do not ingest birds like twin turbo fan jet engines. José Edited December 3, 2018 by Piloto Quote
thinwing Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 9 hours ago, Piloto said: Here are some historical facts: Before Lindberg flight cross the Atlantic on a single two twin engine planes were lost during the attempt. Amelia Earhart was the first solo woman to cross the Atlantic on her single engine Lockheed Vega but disappeared in her twin engine Electra when attempting to land on Howland island. 77 B737 crashes list http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/b737.htm A320 ditch in the Hudson river after takeoff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549 New FAA approved bird avoidance device https://www.amazon.com/Gardeneer-Dalen-RHO4-Scarecrow-Rotating/dp/B0000AX52C/ref=pd_lpo_vtph_86_bs_t_1?_encoding=UTF8&amp&psc=1&amp&refRID=N4HAEW8GSSH00GXPJQXS It installs on top of the nose like a hood ornament. José And not one of them had an installed pilot relief tube...hence they crashed because their bladders were full 2 Quote
TonyK Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 14 hours ago, aviatoreb said: Therefore something must have changed in the pilot population in 1927 to have caused them to become problems. As my grandfather was fond of saying. He started flying when the airplanes were made of wood and the men of steel. Not the other way around. 1 1 Quote
jetdriven Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 (edited) The decline in the number of pirates has led to an increase in global temperatures. Here’s the proof. I guess nobody ever explain to Jose that a turbofan engine will run 25,000 or more hours between overhauls and the accident on the Hudson was the first time in hundreds of millions of commercial flying hours that both jet engines failed and shut down at the same time due to mechanical failure. Edited December 3, 2018 by jetdriven 4 1 Quote
aviatoreb Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, jetdriven said: The decline in the number of pirates has led to an increase in global temperatures. Here’s the proof. I love this graph. I will find a way to work it in to some one of my classes at some point. Thanks for doing my job for me! Its a keeper. Edited December 3, 2018 by aviatoreb 1 Quote
Piloto Posted December 3, 2018 Author Report Posted December 3, 2018 The longest TBO for jet engines I heard was 6,000 hrs at the United MRO in SFO. Jet engines not only ingest birds but debris on the runway (pot holes rocks, bolts, plane parts, hail stones) also. This causes fan blade damage that it is expensive and cumbersome to repair. Runway debris ingestion is most common in underdeveloped countries. Most common on low wing mounted engines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_between_overhauls José Quote
Bravoman Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 1 hour ago, aviatoreb said: I love this graph. I will find a way to work it in to some one of my classes at some point. Thanks for doing my job for me! Its a keeper. Not a comment on the subject matter of this thread but the above graph gave me a chuckle because it drives home the point of how the news media today immediately jumps to the conclusion as to the cause of something based on nothing more than anecdotal conjecture and the masses accept it as fact. 1 Quote
aviatoreb Posted December 3, 2018 Report Posted December 3, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bravoman said: Not a comment on the subject matter of this thread but the above graph gave me a chuckle because it drives home the point of how the news media today immediately jumps to the conclusion as to the cause of something based on nothing more than anecdotal conjecture and the masses accept it as fact. I disagree strongly. This graph is not an example of anecdotal argument. It may be many things but it is not an anecdote. An anecdote suggests a single (or few) examples from which one draws grand (unfounded) generalizing conclusions. That kind of mistake is indeed rife in the press but it is also common all around us. Example: one twin jet engine airplane had a catastrophic loss of power due to birds and landed in the hudson and therefore all twins are unsafe. However that shown about pirates and global temps is a graph that clearly has a lot of data behind it, so it is not an anecdote. Instead it is an example of another classic mistake that correlation and causation are not synonymous. Edited December 3, 2018 by aviatoreb 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.