Hank Posted November 20, 2015 Author Report Posted November 20, 2015 Doggone it! We had to wait for fog to start clearing at our destination, making our departure almost two hours after dark. Didn't get to record any data . . . there's alays aturday, I'll be much lighter then. At least I had kicking' tail wis tonight! Groundspeed started at 164 knots and ended at 178 knots just before descent. Not bad for a C! 1 Quote
pfactor Posted November 20, 2015 Report Posted November 20, 2015 On 11/17/2015, 1:45:13, cnoe said: Now, Vy in my plane is supposed to be 101-94 mph depending on altitude. I assume that's at gross and might go up a little at significantly lighter weights. But I have no expertise in these computations, so maybe someone could help me out. Generally V speeds are published at max gross weight. Some V speeds are lower at lighter weights. The ones that change with weight are Vs0, Vs1, Vx, Vy, Va and best glide. For these speeds you can calculate the adjusted value with this formula: V' = V * SQRT(actual weight / max gross weight) In plain English, take your actual weight, divide by the max gross weight. Take the square root of that number. Then multiply by the V-speed at max-gross weight. Phil 1 Quote
cnoe Posted November 20, 2015 Report Posted November 20, 2015 8 hours ago, pfactor said: Generally V speeds are published at max gross weight. Some V speeds are lower at lighter weights. The ones that change with weight are Vs0, Vs1, Vx, Vy, Va and best glide. For these speeds you can calculate the adjusted value with this formula: V' = V * SQRT(actual weight / max gross weight) In plain English, take your actual weight, divide by the max gross weight. Take the square root of that number. Then multiply by the V-speed at max-gross weight. Phil I am very interested in this subject. There's considerable discussion online about reducing Vy for "altitude", and my POH specifically references the reduction of Vy @ 10K feet. I use your calculation (for weight) to some extent in computing approach and landing speeds but I wasn't sure it was applicable to Vx and Vy. But that does make sense. But from a practical standpoint I'm not sure an 88 mph climb to 10K would be possible due to cooling issues. Even though my J has great cooling I don't think I could climb at those speeds (even with cowl flaps) open and keep oil temp managed. I may try a short climb at that weight and speed to perhaps 5K feet and see what the temps do. Quote
pfactor Posted November 20, 2015 Report Posted November 20, 2015 19 minutes ago, cnoe said: I am very interested in this subject. There's considerable discussion online about reducing Vy for "altitude", and my POH specifically references the reduction of Vy @ 10K feet. Yup. Vy decreases with altitude, and Vx increases with altitude. Also, both are affected by weight. 19 minutes ago, cnoe said: But from a practical standpoint I'm not sure an 88 mph climb to 10K would be possible due to cooling issues. Even though my J has great cooling I don't think I could climb at those speeds (even with cowl flaps) open and keep oil temp managed. I may try a short climb at that weight and speed to perhaps 5K feet and see what the temps do. I've also got a J and had no problems with temperatures climbing at Vy all the way up to 17,000ft (see my post on this). The outside air temperature was warmer than standard too. Phil Quote
cnoe Posted November 20, 2015 Report Posted November 20, 2015 Yes, your post regarding Powerflow is thorough and much appreciated. It appears that your biggest gain was the reduction in CHTs. With cowl flaps in trail I never saw CHTs rise above 380 F and once I passed 10K the highest CHT recorded on my JPI was 374 F. Perhaps in full open position I could have climbed at 88 mph instead of 100 mph and still kept CHTs at 380 or below. I'll have to see. Quote
Hank Posted November 20, 2015 Author Report Posted November 20, 2015 The Owners Manual for my C says Vy decreases from 100 mph at sea level to 91 mph at 10,000 but gives nothing beyond that. Quote
bonal Posted November 21, 2015 Report Posted November 21, 2015 Will be making my climb shortly. As for me this will be interesting since I've never thought much about times to altitude even though it is part of flight planning but this will be a maximum effort light fuel no passengers and really nothing to do with real world conditions. I figure CHT will be the limiting factor. Quote
carl Posted November 21, 2015 Report Posted November 21, 2015 Today I took off at 10:45, OAT was 6 c, DA 1,600 (AWOS) and field elevation is1503. ( I'm using 1500 for the math ) 23 gallons of fuel , just me 200Lbs. Wide Open throttle. 2600 rpm, cowl flap open, CHT not exceeding 400, ( it was cold today) 2000 500, Missed the time 110mph 3000 1000.... 2mins Ram air booster on 110mph 4000 1000 ... .3mins 105 mph 5000 1000.... 4mins 105 mph 6000 1000.... 5 mins 105 mph 7000 1000 .... 5 Mins What the heck my clock stopped!!!! 100mph 8000 1000 ....5 mins 100mph 9000 1000.... 5 mins 100mph 10000 1000.... 5mins 100mph 10500 500 ... 5mins 100mph the climb on my other timer looks like 9 minute total, but I have to repeat this with an improve date recording method and timing device . Then I flew to Cove Valley airport (grass strip) and dropped the plane off for its annual . I set some new personal firsts . New max altitude record 10,500 feet . First Mooney landing on a grass strip. It was surrealist at that altitude, ultra calm. I took a picture from 10,500 for your viewing pleasure. The climb out pitch angle was something I never experienced before, except when trying to stall. You can't see a thing. 3 Quote
bonal Posted November 21, 2015 Report Posted November 21, 2015 Way to go Carl. See it's nice up there. I can't believe it my clock got stuck at around 7000 too must be a conspiracy Quote
bonal Posted November 21, 2015 Report Posted November 21, 2015 Temp 48 ALT 30.17 field 1380 just me and 50% fuel...speed 100mph. As I'm taxiing I realized I forgot my timer so I figure I'll use the panel clock which stopped advancing somewhere around 7000. 2000' 1:10 1250fpm 3000'. 2:05TT 4000' 3:15TT 1100fpm 5000' 4:35 800fpm 6000' 5:55 800fpm 9.8 miles out 7000' 7:25 725fpm 12 miles out 8000' 675fpm 14.7 miles out 9000' 600fpm 17.5 miles out 10000' 700fpm 19.8 miles out 11000' 500fpm. 22.2 miles out Learned some things like my heading was into the sun so my pics don't look so good I'll post as soon as I can down load them. Also made me understand how much IFR training would help me fly better. I'll try again tomorrow. 1 Quote
Hank Posted November 22, 2015 Author Report Posted November 22, 2015 I'll post today's data soon, I left the kneeboard with data in the plane. Only climbed to 6000', the headwinds were pretty strong. Quote
aviatoreb Posted November 22, 2015 Report Posted November 22, 2015 Here's my run from today, but it was not quite all it could be - it was both broken layers I was zigzagging through - and once reduced the pitch slightly, but also a very windy day about 35kts on the ground (straight down the runway) so very bumpy on the way up. So I think there are a few more seconds I could squeeze out with a better run. Plus I only went to 10k - the stated contest - but then for cruise went back down to 8500 since the head wind was ferocious. But on the way home the tail wind was awesome so I went up to 17500 to enjoy up to 270gs. I went to DC and back today to meet my baby sisters new (first) baby - who is 3 days old today. I didn't time a climb on the way home because I was coming out of dc and I got steps and restrictions on the way out. Oh - and the climb from stop was 6:40 I think - I took some data - and its still on my notepad, and I ended up to busy navigating around clouds and keeping level in heavy bumps so I didn't do a very good job recording - but you see in the savvy record - its 6:40 - or so - to 10k from field altitude of 475. 2 Quote
ArtVandelay Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 My POH recommends opening ram air on climb, I don't see anybody mentioning if they did that? Quote
carusoam Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 TJ, It usually will show up as WOTRAO when it does. Wide Open Throttle, Ram Air Open. Best regards, -a- Quote
Shadrach Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 33 minutes ago, teejayevans said: My POH recommends opening ram air on climb, I don't see anybody mentioning if they did that? My ram air opens in clear air. This time of year that's pretty much as soon as I'm 100' AGL and clear of possible FOD from the ground. In the summer when the bugs are heavy and pollen is in the air, that might be 5000'AGL. Quote
Hank Posted November 24, 2015 Author Report Posted November 24, 2015 5 hours ago, teejayevans said: My POH recommends opening ram air on climb, I don't see anybody mentioning if they did that? Some of our planes don't have ram air. Some other people have removed the system from theirs. Quote
carl Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 I opened my ram air intake at 3000 feet on my climb , noted on my data entry. I think it works. Quote
M20F Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 Has anyone ever done a chance comparison or know of a chart that looks at cruise climb speed (120 in my F as example) versus Vy? In just general I don't notice a whole lot of extra FPM going with Vy versus cruise climb and if I am going above 9k I would need to level to get oil temp down to where any initial savings are eaten up by the break in climbing. Quote
Andy95W Posted November 24, 2015 Report Posted November 24, 2015 There was a whole thread on it, but I'm not sure if I saw a table. Check out "Hank versus Bonal". http://mooneyspace.com/topic/16802-hank-vs-bonal/#comment-239374 Quote
Guest Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Just returned from the time to climb check. Field 1050' ASL, baro 30.40"Hg, OAT 9 C. 80 gallons of fuel, 2 on board @ 420LBS. From a standing start, climbed at 120KTS, (Vx= 80 KTS, Vy= 104KTS) Could have climbed steeper but the sun was low and made it hard to see. I will have to do it again to improve the numbers 2000' 0:50 3000' 1:29 4000' 2:06 5000' 2:52 6000' 3:38 less than 5 NM from airport 7000' 4:22 8000' 5:10 9000' 5:54 10,000' 6:43 11,000 7:42. 12 NM from the airport Clarence Quote
bonal Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Doc, those look impressive I think from now on you should be restricted to only M18 performance numbers Quote
M20F Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 1 hour ago, bonal said: Doc, those look impressive I think from now on you should be restricted to only M18 performance numbers Wait those aren't M-18 numbers 1 Quote
aviatoreb Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 2 hours ago, M20Doc said: Just returned from the time to climb check. Field 1050' ASL, baro 30.40"Hg, OAT 9 C. 80 gallons of fuel, 2 on board @ 420LBS. From a standing start, climbed at 120KTS, (Vx= 80 KTS, Vy= 104KTS) Could have climbed steeper but the sun was low and made it hard to see. I will have to do it again to improve the numbers 2000' 0:50 3000' 1:29 4000' 2:06 5000' 2:52 6000' 3:38 less than 5 NM from airport 7000' 4:22 8000' 5:10 9000' 5:54 10,000' 6:43 11,000 7:42. 12 NM from the airport Clarence You got an IO720 hanging on the front of your M18? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.