Jump to content

Camguard at 10 hours?


toto

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, toto said:

This is a chrome cylinder..  I have no prior experience with chrome break-in, but so far it doesn't seem that much different from steel.  Oil consumption was high for the first 2-3 hours, but it has gotten much closer to normal in the past 3 hours or so.  I guess the irony is that chrome shouldn't have problems with corrosion - it's the other three cylinders (and the rest of the engine) I'm worried about :)

 

As a related anecdote, my 3 month avionics refresh in 2015 was immediately followed by need to rework 2 cylinders at annual.  I took it to the avionics shop with fresh Aeroshell W100 + Camguard in the engine.  If I had to do it again I would probably use a dehydration system of some kind also.  The heavier weight oil also in principle runs off the components more slowly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2023 at 1:21 PM, toto said:

I’m breaking in a new cylinder.. I’ve now crossed the 10-hour mark running at high power using plain Phillips XC.

I’m planning to do an oil change, and I’m not sure how long after the cylinder break-in starts before adding Camguard is a good idea. The plane will be in the avionics shop for a while starting soon, and I don’t like the idea of an extended period sitting without Camguard, but I don’t want to harm the break-in by adding Camguard prematurely. 

Is 10 hours long enough? Or should I keep running plain XC?

Why not just use Phillips Victory and keep it simple?  I scanned the thread.  Curious why no one mentioned it.  That’s what I’m using.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DCarlton said:

Why not just use Phillips Victory and keep it simple?  I scanned the thread.  Curious why no one mentioned it.  That’s what I’m using.  

Phillips Victory might be great as an every day oil, but I’m basically trying to stick with no scuff additives. I’m continuing to use straight XC, but I’d like to add CamGuard for the corrosion protection. The cylinder is over ten hours now, but I’m still trying to be careful about what goes in the oil - to avoid anything that might compromise the break in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, toto said:

Phillips Victory might be great as an every day oil, but I’m basically trying to stick with no scuff additives. I’m continuing to use straight XC, but I’d like to add CamGuard for the corrosion protection. The cylinder is over ten hours now, but I’m still trying to be careful about what goes in the oil - to avoid anything that might compromise the break in.

 

I’m no expert but I thought the additive in Victory met the LYC recommended specs and was very similar to Camguard.  Camguard may have additional additives.  I’d have to do the research all over again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DCarlton said:

I’m no expert but I thought the additive in Victory met the LYC recommended specs and was very similar to Camguard.  Camguard may have additional additives.  I’d have to do the research all over again.  

I’m no oil expert, but LW-16702 is specifically an anti-scuff additive and is required for certain engines, but not for my IO-360. 
 

https://www.lycoming.com/content/oil-and-your-engine

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2023 at 1:45 AM, DCarlton said:

Why not just use Phillips Victory and keep it simple?  I scanned the thread.  Curious why no one mentioned it.  That’s what I’m using.  

Victory has the Lycoming anti scuff additive.  NOT the anti-corrision of Cam Guard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve used Phillips XC and Camguard in my J model since overhaul 600+ hours ago and I have had several stuck valves. Sometimes  they were frozen and had to be driven out.  When the guides were reamed it was carbon that was the problem.  The engine has been run LOP exclusively. In the latest oil change the filter had a lot of chunks of carbon in it.  Oil and filter have been changed every 25 hours.    The owner of a cylinder shop who has been repairing cylinders day in and day out for probably 40 or 50 years told me that Camguard was the culprit.  True this is anecdotal evidence but it carries some weight with me considering my personal experience and who it came from.  I am in annual now and I am going to AS W 100 and no Camguard.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2023 at 1:45 AM, DCarlton said:

Why not just use Phillips Victory and keep it simple?  I scanned the thread.  Curious why no one mentioned it.  That’s what I’m using.  

I don’t think people read the threads, question is should I put camguard in and that’s all that’s looked at, camguard

If you look, this oil is specifically what he wants, is used as a break-in oil etc https://phillips66lubricants.com/product/aviation-anti-rust-oil/

What does it not do that he wants done? It’s not even expensive or hard to get.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, A64Pilot said:

I don’t think people read the threads, question is should I put camguard in and that’s all that’s looked at, camguard

If you look, this oil is specifically what he wants, is used as a break-in oil etc https://phillips66lubricants.com/product/aviation-anti-rust-oil/

What does it not do that he wants done? It’s not even expensive or hard to get.

Well - basically, I'm running XC, and I'm just trying to figure out whether I can/should dump a few ounces of CamGuard in there for corrosion protection.  I know that I could drain the oil and pickle it, but we're only talking about a few weeks.  If the juice isn't worth the squeeze, that's a completely fine answer - I really just wanted to know whether CamGuard was going to have a harmful effect on a cylinder with about 15 hours on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mooneyflyfast said:

I’ve used Phillips XC and Camguard in my J model since overhaul 600+ hours ago and I have had several stuck valves. Sometimes  they were frozen and had to be driven out.  When the guides were reamed it was carbon that was the problem.  The engine has been run LOP exclusively. In the latest oil change the filter had a lot of chunks of carbon in it.  Oil and filter have been changed every 25 hours.    The owner of a cylinder shop who has been repairing cylinders day in and day out for probably 40 or 50 years told me that Camguard was the culprit.  True this is anecdotal evidence but it carries some weight with me considering my personal experience and who it came from.  I am in annual now and I am going to AS W 100 and no Camguard.  

I stopped running camguard. Had two stuck valves and one starting to show issues, one that required a complete cylinder replacement due to a bad seat that couldnt be lapped. All of which started after using camguard. Once the second valve guide was reamed I stopped using camguard and my issues have since disappeared. My engine was a low time engine as well at around 300 hours SMOH. All of these valves had to be hammered out they were so tight.

I fly ~100 hours a year and I usually dont have more then a few weeks of non use. As you said anecdotal evidence but I stopped using it and dont worry about engine corrosion considering I fly it enough. I use Phillips XC multi weight as im up north where it gets too cold for single weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, A64Pilot said:

I don’t think people read the threads, question is should I put camguard in and that’s all that’s looked at, camguard

If you look, this oil is specifically what he wants, is used as a break-in oil etc https://phillips66lubricants.com/product/aviation-anti-rust-oil/

What does it not do that he wants done? It’s not even expensive or hard to get.

I read it but didn't remember the recommended break in period.  At 10 hours, I assumed break in was complete.  How many hours would you use this oil before you switched to something else?  How long is an "extended period".   It's not clear on the Phillips web site.  Someone needs to publish a spreadsheet of oils, MIL-SPECS, additives and recommended uses to help us get beyond tribal knowledge, marketing and smoke and mirrors.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DCarlton said:

I read it but didn't remember the recommended break in period.  At 10 hours, I assumed break in was complete.  How many hours would you use this oil before you switched to something else?  It's not clear on the Phillips web site.  Someone needs to publish a spreadsheet of oils, MIL-SPECS, additives and recommended uses to help get past marketing and smoke and mirrors.  

https://www.lycoming.com/content/hard-facts-about-engine-break

"The first careful consideration for engine run-in is the oil to be used. The latest revision of Lycoming Service Instruction 1014 should be consulted for this information. The basic rule which applies to most normally aspirated Lycoming piston engines is simple: use straight mineral oil of the proper viscosity for the first fifty hours or until oil consumption stabilizes. Then switch to ashless dispersant (AD) oil."

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mooneyflyfast said:

This is my latest filter running 25-50 XC and Camguard. About 40 hours on it

064CE452-CB57-4E0D-A3F6-C86B1F8B4F43.jpeg

Jeff,

You might consider buying an oil analysis kit from Aircraft Spruce and sending in your filter material to AvLab and seeing what they determine it is for sure. It may be mostly carbon, but if there is even a trace of anything else I'd want to know.

Lance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have almost 200 hours on the engine since I bought the plane from David (Sabremech) running Victory and Camguard. I’m not seeing that kind of carbon in the filter (virtually none really). Change oil 25-30 hours.  That is interesting to see and I’ll keep an eye on that on mine…

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mooneyflyfast said:

This is my latest filter running 25-50 XC and Camguard. About 40 hours on it

064CE452-CB57-4E0D-A3F6-C86B1F8B4F43.jpeg

Ew.   Does a magnet pick any of that up?   I'm assuming not, since it looks like carbon.    I've not seen that much carbon debris on a filter before, or at least not in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.