Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I went with the three blade McCauley but the more I've read over the years, they don't seem to make as much technical sense as a two blade with the IO-360... but they look better.  Something to discuss with your prop expert.  

Posted
1 hour ago, DCarlton said:

I went with the three blade McCauley but the more I've read over the years, they don't seem to make as much technical sense as a two blade with the IO-360... but they look better.  Something to discuss with your prop expert.  

I've been happy with my McCauley 3-blade, but it was on my C when I bought it so I have nothing to compare it to.

Posted
7 hours ago, Hank said:

I've been happy with my McCauley 3-blade, but it was on my C when I bought it so I have nothing to compare it to.

I'm happy too but I think I've read that the two blade is more efficient and marginally better for speed and the three is marginally better for climb.  Don't remember if I seen data.  Also seems like I remember the three blade being suboptimal (my words for lack of a better word) from a vibration stand point when paired with a four cylinder engine but don't remember the details on that either.  Would probably do the research all over again and go with the best value / cheapest if I needed a prop but I'm very satisfied too.  I'm sure there's an expert around here on MS.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.