Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, 201er said:

Sounds like they landed in a field ok.

The FAA will be investigating whether or not a flight plan had been filed.

Why does that matter? Just curious…

Posted
58 minutes ago, larrynimmo said:

Why does that matter? Just curious…

I think there is a missing :) At the end of 201er’s poke at the FAA and printed media….

-a-

Posted
10 hours ago, 201er said:

Sounds like they landed in a field ok.

The FAA will be investigating whether or not a flight plan had been filed.

I would hope they were not flying around without a flight plan.

  • Haha 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, cferr59 said:

I would hope they were not flying around without a flight plan.

Why do you say that? My primary CFI showed me how, and as a student I filed only for my Ling XC. Since then, I've only filed when IFR. When I went VFR to Yellowstone and back, three days each way, I used flight following but didn't "file" anything. I seem to have survived . . . .

  • Like 1
Posted

It appears they lost the engine at 3000 feet and made a turn toward X35.  They were roughly 10 nm north of X35 and ended up a little under 5 miles from Dunnellon, Marion county.  Rough numbers but still  a 10 to 1 glide ratio. I wonder if the engine was completely gone or if was producing some power?

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N79350/history/20220615/1512Z/KOCF/L 29.11931 -82.35892

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Hank said:

Why do you say that? My primary CFI showed me how, and as a student I filed only for my Ling XC. Since then, I've only filed when IFR. When I went VFR to Yellowstone and back, three days each way, I used flight following but didn't "file" anything. I seem to have survived . . . .

You might consider removing this post from a public forum. At the very least file a NASA form.

  • Haha 5
Posted
35 minutes ago, Hank said:

Why do you say that? My primary CFI showed me how, and as a student I filed only for my Ling XC. Since then, I've only filed when IFR. When I went VFR to Yellowstone and back, three days each way, I used flight following but didn't "file" anything. I seem to have survived . . . .

The post I was quoting appeared to have a joke about filing a flight plan. My post was similarly not serious.

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 hours ago, 201er said:

Sounds like they landed in a field ok.

The FAA will be investigating whether or not a flight plan had been filed.

Are you suggesting a flight plan is needed for local training?  Why, is this controlled airspace?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tony Starke said:

You might consider removing this post from a public forum. At the very least file a NASA form.

Do what??? You do realize that VFR flights do not require flight plans, even inside Class B, C, D and E airspace? Only in the outer ring of TFRs and the DC exclusion whose name keeps changing. 

Posted (edited)

Planes crash due to lack of flight plans, or lack of a control tower, or from hitting "air pockets". Every reporter knows that....;)

Edited by philiplane
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, philiplane said:

Planes crash only due to lack of flight plans, or lack of a control tower, or from hitting "air pockets". Every reporter knows that....;)

...and when the engine stalls.

Posted
4 hours ago, ArtVandelay said:

What a terrible website…all the junk (ADs, popup videos, etc)…..yuk.

Yes, they are owned by Gannett and prior to that the New York times. Typical left wing rag that has lost most of their credibility along with tens of thousands of subscribers and tens of millions in ad revenue. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Sounds more like an incident as opposed to accident.

Incidents are often not investigated, unless things have changed.

About 5 or 10 miles from my house, ought to go see tomorrow 

Posted

While I don’t wish an investigation on the aircrew, it would actually be nice if these “minor” ones resulting from loss of power were investigated.  The airplane is in perfect condition and the aircrew are alive for interviews.  It should be really easy to determine cause and get us better statistics/safety.  

When the loss of power is at night/imc and the same airplane impacts a hillside at high velocity, the resulting investigation takes a long time and is much more difficult to find the cause.

  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.