Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, mike_elliott said:

aside from cost, I wonder why it was not made from a billet vs cast

Ha, ha, ha! "Aside from cost"! You're funny this morning!

Aside from cost, how do the accountants tell engineers which one to buy? Been there, done that, lost the rodeo and was stuck with the sh!t option because it was cheaper. And had every problem I expected to have, plus some others, many of which would not have happened had Accounting let me buy a more expensive system. Instead, we bought the cheaper one and paid much, much more in downtime, lost production, replacement parts and bad product. But those losses did not come from the sacred Capital Budget . . . .

Edited by Hank
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sixstring2k said:

Wouldn’t an oil analysis catch something like this? Or the beginning of it? Just asking out of curiosity. 

Most likely not. Tensile failure of the tappet roller shaft boss, then the Ca Ca hit the rotating oscillator so to speak. Not much time for an oil change in this event

Posted

The pics are amazing...

Everything was going along swimmingly well....

until the roller‘s shaft got part way out....

Cast or machined, won’t make much of a difference when parts get out of line and crash together....

It appears that something may have caused the roller shaft to become loose and unconstrained...
 

It looks like there were some odd tracks displayed on the cam lobe over time...

Words often used to describe damage caused by oxidation were used... 

Roller cam followers, I thought, were better able to handle the rough surfaces of a pitted cam...
 

Something let the axle out...

Once broken free... what kept the rest of the engine from soldiering on?

Five other cylinders in good working order?

How do we get to see the data from that JPI?  Those trends will be extra interesting.... @kortopates
 

There may be some signs from five flights earlier, or only five minutes earlier... 

+1 for the PIC recognizing the single cylinder going off line... and successfully landing amongst trees in the dark! :)
 

Inviting the usual MSers that enjoy Sunday Engine discussions... @jetdriven @M20Doc

PP observations only... not a mechanic...

Best regards,

-a-

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, carusoam said:

How do we get to see the data from that JPI?  Those trends will be extra interesting.... @kortopates

its here: https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/63500-63999/63917/636469.pdf

You can see the event at 2:30 in the data

Or if you want the EDM-900 data file: 636471.csv

Edited by kortopates
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Wow!

Thanks Paul!!!

There is possibly more to be learned here...

Partial power for another 20minutes...

Then something else happened... in the dying throws and fits... ?

It would be interesting to hear the pilot’s first hand account...
 

Thanks for sharing the graphs...

Best regards,

-a-

Posted
7 hours ago, Hank said:

There's surprisingly little structure holding the roller in place!

The material is wafer thin.  I snapped this picture of one from my junk drawer.

68739B3A-8C47-411B-B56E-12E5C4C445C9.jpeg

DB249BE8-B94F-4E7A-99B2-1326DFF4E878.jpeg

Posted
13 minutes ago, carusoam said:

Any idea if there is some kind of retainer holding the shaft/axle for the roller in place?
 

Best regards,

-a-

I’ll have a look to see what holds it in place.

Clarence

Posted
19 minutes ago, M20Doc said:

The material is wafer thin.  I snapped this picture of one from my junk drawer.

68739B3A-8C47-411B-B56E-12E5C4C445C9.jpeg

DB249BE8-B94F-4E7A-99B2-1326DFF4E878.jpeg

This doesn't exactly make me want a roller tappet engine.  Is this the first documented failure of this nature or has this happened before?  The tappets in my Harley are beefier than that...

Posted

There is probably a way to look up engine issues as they get recorded...

They don’t necessarily need to cause an accident... 
 

If they become a significant issue... the AD system has a way of notifying owners...

PP thoughts only, not a mechanic...

Best regards,

-a-

 

Posted

.....'The engine's 11 other roller tappet assemblies were found in overall good condition, and each of their respective shafts remained staked. '

My take is the cam led to the roller failure....rough ride.   Should oil analysis reflect the wear on the cam?

Posted
13 hours ago, M20Doc said:

I’ll have a look to see what holds it in place.

Clarence

the shaft repositioning itself outside its operating environment surely had to be a design consideration if this was the primary cause. That said, I left a very sweet engine in ittty bitty pieces entering turn 5 at Elkhart Lake back in the day because a wrist pin retaining clip (O Jesus clips, you see them and say "Oh jesus...") slipped from its groove. Cause was sloppy care in installation and putting a slight rounding on the groove's upper square edge allowing it to creep out.

Anthony could be spot on about the shaft creep being the primary cause of the boss destruction, vs "value engineering"

  • Thanks 1
Posted
.....'The engine's 11 other roller tappet assemblies were found in overall good condition, and each of their respective shafts remained staked. '
My take is the cam led to the roller failure....rough ride.   Should oil analysis reflect the wear on the cam?

I like to know if the cam node that failed is an intake or exhaust node, the intake (on 360 anyway) are shared, so if it caused the failure there should be 2 failed rollers.
Posted

The valve could have stuck, then the roller tappet was then overloaded and failed. But usually the pushrod bends. These things have been in service fifteen years now, and this is the first failure of that mode that we've seen.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jetdriven said:

The valve could have stuck, then the roller tappet was then overloaded and failed. But usually the pushrod bends. These things have been in service fifteen years now, and this is the first failure of that mode that we've seen.

That would suck if the new weak point of failure is the roller tappet axel vs the pushrods. The valve stem lubrication and resultant cooling hasnt really changed, and the stuck valves will still be as common roller tappet or not. It would be interesting to see how many roller tappet engines have had "issues". Just because we havent seen them, that doesnt mean it hasnt happened of course.

Posted

All engines have issues and failure modes. The question is, is the roller tappet more reliable than the flat tappet? I'd guess mostly yes, but economically, whats the tradeoff? I havent seen any cam failures requiring engine teardown due to rollers, besides this.  But plenty due to the flat tappets. So, you trade 1 accident in a million for a "run to TBO" engine, vs one thats 2/3rds as likely, due to risk of lifter spalling.  Totally made up numbers, BTW.

Posted
2 hours ago, jetdriven said:

The valve could have stuck, then the roller tappet was then overloaded and failed. But usually the pushrod bends. These things have been in service fifteen years now, and this is the first failure of that mode that we've seen.

Must be at least two if @M20Doc has one in his junk drawer.

Posted
27 minutes ago, jetdriven said:

The question is, is the roller tappet more reliable than the flat tappet?

Ill disagree, Byron. My question is if the roller tappet engine has any less chance of exhaust valve coking and hard pointing the pushrod vs the tappet itself. If as you suggest, normally the pushrods fail first in compression, but perhaps now the tappet does instead, this is a much more serious point of failure. The problem of coking the valves caused by excessive CHT's is a different problem than the lack of lubrication/poor metallurgy tappet fix the roller cam offers.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.