Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 11:25 AM, Cargil48 said:

Remember me quoting some who say the Mooneys "sit too low"? Here is a good pic showing what they mean. 

Mooney low.jpg

Expand  

Not all models have this affliction.  Mostly confined to the longer bodies.  This is mine.  Just sitting.  Looking like it is ready to jump into the air.100_0453.thumb.JPG.de22232d6a3d762ec15a3627526250e1.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 3:00 PM, Ned Gravel said:

Not all models have this affliction.  Mostly confined to the longer bodies.  This is mine.  Just sitting.  Looking like it is ready to jump into the air.100_0453.thumb.JPG.de22232d6a3d762ec15a3627526250e1.JPG

Expand  

Ah... Did they shorten the legs of the MLG on the newer models?? Maybe to give more prop clearence on  the higher hp engined ones?

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 12:05 PM, kpaul said:

I wish I had a photo of it, but at OSH '16 I believe it was, Mooney put the plan in their booth on blocks.  They jacked up the plane and had custom made risers for the mains so the plane sat level.

Expand  

Of course it helps a lot to get airborne if a plane has this AoA when running down the runway for t/o... You may not even need to lower the flaps...

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 11:25 AM, Cargil48 said:

Remember me quoting some who say the Mooneys "sit too low"? Here is a good pic showing what they mean. 

Mooney low.jpg

Expand  

With all due respect to long body owners around here, I've felt this way for years.  It's not that they sit too low, it's that the tail low on the ground makes it look weird, like I wouldn't spend $800k for a weird looking airplane.  Like, "don't touch the tail, you might make it tip over" weird.

Flight performance is phenomenal, of course.  And I really do love all Mooneys.  But I'd still pick a 252/Encore.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 7:43 PM, Andy95W said:

With all due respect to long body owners around here, I've felt this way for years.  It's not that they sit too low, it's that the tail low on the ground makes it look weird, like I wouldn't spend $800k for a weird looking airplane.  Like, "don't touch the tail, you might make it tip over" weird.

Flight performance is phenomenal, of course.  And I really do love all Mooneys.  But I'd still pick a 252/Encore.

Expand  

You are hereby fired from MS....... continued BLASPHEMY!!  (kidding and laughing of course I am). :lol:

That photo is unflattering indeed,?sitting on the grass and at that angle.

I find beauty in all Mooney models.  :)

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 7:54 PM, MooneyMitch said:

You are hereby fired from MS....... continued BLASPHEMY!!  (kidding and laughing of course I am). :lol:

That photo is unflattering indeed,?sitting on the grass and at that angle.

I find beauty in all Mooney models.  :)

Expand  

It is blasphemy, I know!  I had a hard time typing it, especially because I've always wanted an Ovation.  But a friend had a 2008 Ovation 3 that was awesome- but every time I stepped on his step to get in, I felt like I'd put the airplane on its tail.  There's a reason the factory display at OSH had it up on blocks.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Get one!  The Ovation is a great airplane.  Plenty of room under the hood for maintenance access.  I always felt quite special flying it.  

Heck, even I look bad from some angles..... we’ll honestly I look bad from most angles..... :lol:

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 7:43 PM, Andy95W said:

With all due respect to long body owners around here, I've felt this way for years.  It's not that they sit too low, it's that the tail low on the ground makes it look weird, like I wouldn't spend $800k for a weird looking airplane.  Like, "don't touch the tail, you might make it tip over" weird.

Flight performance is phenomenal, of course.  And I really do love all Mooneys.  But I'd still pick a 252/Encore.

Expand  

That must be why Mooney puts them on blocks at SnF and Oshkosh.

Clarence

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 5:12 PM, Cargil48 said:

Ah... Did they shorten the legs of the MLG on the newer models?? Maybe to give more prop clearence on  the higher hp engined ones?

Expand  

It might be the extra 800 pounds on the same four landing gear discs.

Clarence

Posted
  On 12/5/2019 at 11:25 AM, Cargil48 said:

Remember me quoting some who say the Mooneys "sit too low"? 

Expand  

Frankly, I find that aggressive and cat-like. What's not to love? Meowr!!!

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Speaking of AOA...

The long body has an attitude about twice that of the mid and short body Mooneys...

not that kind of attitude...  :)

The kind that shows up on the AI... 6 vs. 3° (?) While sitting on the pavement...

There were a few things changed with the gear when the Bravo was built... they were built a bit more stout compared to the first LB M20L...  
 

It is quite possible some lengths were changed as well...?

Best regards,

-a-

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.