Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just have one thing to say about that: 

Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold and ƒ: Mm → Rn a short C-embedding (or immersion) into Euclidean space Rn, where n ≥ m+1. Then for arbitrary ε > 0 there is an embedding (or immersion) ƒεMm → Rn which is

  1. in class C1,
  2. isometric: for any two vectors v,w ∈ Tx(M) in the tangent space at x ∈ M,
    g(v,w)=\langle df_\epsilon(v),df_\epsilon(w)\rangle,
  3. ε-close to ƒ:
    | f(x) - f_\epsilon (x) | < \epsilon ~\forall~ x\in M.
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, aviatoreb said:

I just have one thing to say about that: 

Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold and ƒ: Mm → Rn a short C-embedding (or immersion) into Euclidean space Rn, where n ≥ m+1. Then for arbitrary ε > 0 there is an embedding (or immersion) ƒεMm → Rn which is

  1. in class C1,
  2. isometric: for any two vectors v,w ∈ Tx(M) in the tangent space at x ∈ M,
    g(v,w)=\langle df_\epsilon(v),df_\epsilon(w)\rangle,
  3. ε-close to ƒ:
    | f(x) - f_\epsilon (x) | < \epsilon ~\forall~ x\in M.

I am calling Homeland security 

  • Like 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, LANCECASPER said:

The lady is the dangerous one

No kidding - like everywhere I need to be sitting still for a an hour or more - like an airline flight - I always bring blank paper folded in my back pocket, and I take it out and start doodling mathematics about problems I am currently working on.  Only a complete xenophobic selfish weirdo would assume it has something to do with them.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, laytonl said:

I did this stuff many years ago.  Now it just looks like Greek. Oh wait, it is Greek!

BSEE, Auburn '77

lee

For some reason the Greek alphabet is used a lot in mathematics.

In the above, I stated (from wiki) two classic big named theorems or concepts - each which has impacted my own work.  These are some massive and named big time theorems.  1st is the Nash Embedding theorem - named after the very same John Nash whom the hollywood movie "A beautiful mind" was made.  Same guy who won a Nobel prize in economics for his work practically inventing the field of game theory.  And if that were all he would be an utter giant.  But the Nash embedding theory - if that were all - he would be an utter giant.  But he did more too. All by the age of 30 or so.  Thereafter he suffered from mental illness for many years until he got much better in his 70s.  He died tragically about 2 years ago when he and his wife were coming home from being awarded the Abel prize in Sweden.  On his taxi ride home from the airport, Newark, back to Princeton, the taxi had a car crash and they both died.  Too tragic to be a Hollywood script.

The other is the "Zeta function" which impacts in MANY fields in mathematics and physics, written in several interesting and surprisingly different forms.  These are not part of typical undergraduate mathematics education, as a lot of mathematics aren't.  There is lots more going on after calculus.  And a lot of new unsolved problems for low-life anti-establishment homeland security threatening folk like me to work on and some have major impacts in all of our lives (ever wonder how page rank the google search engine mathematics works?  - read the $25B eigenvector: https://www.rose-hulman.edu/~bryan/googleFinalVersionFixed.pdf  ).

Our short-hand notations used in mathematics are as much specialized professional language even more so than legal lawyerly mumbo jumbo.  We should put lawyers on homeland security watch list.  I am all day long making scribbles on little bits of paper - and somehow I found a job where they pay me to do that!  believe me - no one is threatened by a contour integral.  Or an isometric embedding. Or a root of the zeta function.  Or an eigenvector of a million  dimensional eigenvector, or a closed and perfect uncountable set.

Edited by aviatoreb
Posted
10 hours ago, steingar said:

Economists doing math is very suspicious.  I always thought they read tea leaves.

I was an economics and math major in college. Economics is an interesting discipline because although it is a social science it is extremely math based. At U of Florida we had to have differential equations, advanced calculus and stats as a prerequisite to the upper level courses like econometrics, game theory, etc

Posted
9 hours ago, Bravoman said:

I was an economics and math major in college. Economics is an interesting discipline because although it is a social science it is extremely math based. At U of Florida we had to have differential equations, advanced calculus and stats as a prerequisite to the upper level courses like econometrics, game theory, etc

I was being somewhat facetious.  I don't think there's a smiley for that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.