Buying process Help/Advice

[M20F]

18 minutes ago, 0TreeLemur said:

I agree with this.  

Anyone who won’t sign up for this assuming you are using a known MSC or otherwise respected AI, is trying to sell you a dog. 
 
I wouldn’t agree to Boots Malone AI service as example to sell my plane but would have no issue with the good folks.  

[Pinecone]

1 hour ago, hubcap said:

I have never heard of a full panel upgrade being done in 5 weeks. If you have a service provider that does that kind of work in 5 weeks you are very fortunate. Myrtle was down for 6 months when she was upgraded. I believe @Pinecone had a similar experience as well as several others here on Mooneyspace. I believe @Schllc had a project that took well over a year. 
 

I would still suggest allowing for significant downtime on major panel upgrades.

Just my opinion.

Mine was about 4.5 months.  Some extra time finishing the annual and chasing an oil leak.

The original quote was 8 - 10 weeks.  Shop acknowledged that it took longer than they expected.

[Pinecone]

1 hour ago, M20F said:

I bought my plane from Jimmy when it was All American.  Don Maxwell annual and they paid all airworthy.  I wouldn’t buy a plane that didn’t come with an annual from an AI that I was comfortable with.  
 
A pre-purchase inspection is toilet paper.  An annual is somebody’s license/livelihood.  This topic has come up many times here with folks saying you will never buy a plane, they would never sell under those conditions, etc.  I assure you that one can get this condition and it is worth doing.  
 

My two cents only. 

Except that if it annualled, that goes in the log book.  So when you sell, you want some shop you don't know, halfway across the country doing an annual???

The common recommendation is the shop does a PPI, that if that is good, they will complete as an annual one the buyer becomes the owner.

[0TreeLemur]

41 minutes ago, Pinecone said:

Except that if it annualled, that goes in the log book.  So when you sell, you want some shop you don't know, halfway across the country doing an annual???

The common recommendation is the shop does a PPI, that if that is good, they will complete as an annual one the buyer becomes the owner.

It's gotta be a known shop.  That's the rub.

[Schllc]

2 hours ago, hubcap said:

I would still suggest allowing for significant downtime on major panel upgrades.

Just my opinion.

Setting realistic expectations will make all the difference in the world when walking into a big project like that. Had they told me 17 months and I had accepted it prior to beginning, it would have been a lot less stressful. 
I absolutely believe a project can take 5-6 weeks of actual manpower, and if everything is planned, ordered and or available it could be done in that timeframe. 
But if a shop told me that with confidence I would still be pretty skeptical. It not usually all their fault, sometimes it’s a quality or elective issue.  The market and regulations play a large role in your options as well. Once your plane is in 1,000 pieces of the floor of the hangar, what are you going to do?  It’s not worth litigation unless you have enough money, time and will(masochism) to hold to the principle.

Having it moved isn’t a real good option, and no one else can really work in someone else’s shop etc etc. 

Whatever someone, anyone tells you, just multiply that by three to five times and set that as your expectation.  This way if it happens on time, you hit the lotto, enjoy it. 
And when it doesn't, you will be prepared and may even be able to leverage a few freebies as a concession.  
 

I’m really not criticizing or busting anyone’s chops.  It’s just something that should be baked into the formula because it is not the exception, it’s the rule.

This would apply to any major upgrade/repair/alteration, not just avionics.  
I firmly believe it is going to get a lot worse, and a lot more expensive for a while anyway. 
There is no generation of people aspiring to work in these trades, much less in the pipeline training.  
While that may sound cynical, it isn’t really meant to be, just stressing the importance of proper expectations. These are large and discretionary decisions, it can be pleasant if it goes the way you expected….

[Schllc]

18 hours ago, M20F said:

I bought my plane from Jimmy when it was All American.  Don Maxwell annual and they paid all airworthy.  I wouldn’t buy a plane that didn’t come with an annual from an AI that I was comfortable with.  
 
A pre-purchase inspection is toilet paper.  An annual is somebody’s license/livelihood.  This topic has come up many times here with folks saying you will never buy a plane, they would never sell under those conditions, etc.  I assure you that one can get this condition and it is worth doing.  
 

My two cents only. 

Even an annual can be misleading. 
The plane I recently purchased had what I would classify as incompetent maintenance. They didn’t do any SB’s, a lot of things done improperly, and a lot of things well out of spec.  Original landing pucks from 2006, original brake fluid, original mags one of which has never been overhauled, the list is not short. Same 3 or 4 shops did all his annuals, none of them mooney’s service centers. 
 

[Pinecone]

On 12/27/2024 at 8:32 PM, Schllc said:

Setting realistic expectations will make all the difference in the world when walking into a big project like that. Had they told me 17 months and I had accepted it prior to beginning, it would have been a lot less stressful. 
I absolutely believe a project can take 5-6 weeks of actual manpower, and if everything is planned, ordered and or available it could be done in that timeframe. 
But if a shop told me that with confidence I would still be pretty skeptical. It not usually all their fault, sometimes it’s a quality or elective issue.  

As I said, mine was quoted as 8 - 10 weeks.  A tech was assigned to my plane and other than lending a helping hand here are there, worked full time on it.  He was out sick 1 week and attended the AEA convention for a week.   And it took a total of about 18 weeks, which was 16 weeks of work.  Everything was in the shop months before the work started.

Shop owner admitted that it took longer than they expected.  They have done several Mooneys, but not this extensive a job.

[MikeOH]

1 hour ago, Pinecone said:

As I said, mine was quoted as 8 - 10 weeks.  A tech was assigned to my plane and other than lending a helping hand here are there, worked full time on it.  He was out sick 1 week and attended the AEA convention for a week.   And it took a total of about 18 weeks, which was 16 weeks of work.  Everything was in the shop months before the work started.

Shop owner admitted that it took longer than they expected.  They have done several Mooneys, but not this extensive a job.

YUCK!

If I understand your post correctly, he spent 640 hours (16 weeks as a full-time employee)?  I hope you didn't pay hourly for that!  Frankly, it's hard to imagine the shop even covered his DL cost (640 x $30/hr = $19,200)...unless techs make minimum wage.

I guess my real question is if that is a typical amount of labor for a job like yours, or was the tech just slow?

[Pinecone]

Good news was that the shop did not charge extra.  There were some changes, so it was over the quote, but they only charged the extra labor for changes, but also deducted for what the original plan was.

Quote was for 400 hours (10 weeks).  So a bit over 50% longer.

Maybe tech as a bit slow, but I saw the plane every week, and it was a LOT of work.  Basically removed all the wiring and redid it.