sdflysurf Posted March 23, 2021 Report Posted March 23, 2021 I've removed my AI and DG from my vacuum system to install dual G5 Can I remove my suction gauge and my VAC low and VAC high indicators? Also is there anything I should do to make sure the proper suction pressure is still there and it isn't too strong? I plan to measure. The only thing left is the PC wing leveler system and the retractable step. Quote
0TreeLemur Posted March 23, 2021 Report Posted March 23, 2021 Your wing leveler won't work without your Brittain DG unless you also have a Brittain gyro/valve system in the tail. I think that is an older (pre '67 models or older) feature. @takair has an electric step actuator that replaces the vacuum actuated retraction system. Might was well go all in with the vacuumless system. 1 Quote
jamesm Posted March 24, 2021 Report Posted March 24, 2021 (edited) I would expect the wing leveler to work if he keeps the turn coordinator which controls roll stability. Unless he has an autopilot then he would need some form heading source. don't quote me on this... I think someone here on MS has figured out how to connect the G5's using a GAD29B to the autopilot I can't remember if century or brittian autopilot. When my turn coordinator died the local instrument shop wouldn't repair the turn coordinator. so overtime I pulled entire wing leveler system . For the vacuum gauge and goes you may consider keeping the gauge for the wing leveler to ensure that there is output from vacuum pump. If panel space is an issue they make a1" vacuum gauge . The "auto step " electric conversion that replace the vacuum step servo. It works great real easy to install. https://flightenhancements.com/index.html Just my thoughts, James '67C Edited March 24, 2021 by jamesm 2 Quote
carusoam Posted March 24, 2021 Report Posted March 24, 2021 65C had a separate gyro in the tail for the Brittain... -a- Quote
Igor_U Posted March 24, 2021 Report Posted March 24, 2021 On 3/23/2021 at 10:29 PM, sdflysurf said: I've removed my AI and DG from my vacuum system to install dual G5 Can I remove my suction gauge and my VAC low and VAC high indicators? Also is there anything I should do to make sure the proper suction pressure is still there and it isn't too strong? I plan to measure. The only thing left is the PC wing leveler system and the retractable step. Expand I believe your PC system (like on my 67F) is using TC 100 turn coordinator so you are good there. I actually just updated LHS panel and removed Low-Hi lights (Expensive Sigmatec Vacuum sensor is inop) and relocated Vacuum gage from RHS panel to pilot side. the Not sure why would you remove vacuum gage and they are typically small and mine is using 1" hole. I guess this is a question for your A&P who would sign the logbooks; I would still prefer to have a gage as long as keeping a Brittain PC (and step). Regards, Quote
hmasing Posted March 24, 2021 Report Posted March 24, 2021 On 3/24/2021 at 12:30 AM, jamesm said: The "auto step " electric conversion that replace the vacuum step servo. It works great real easy to install. https://flightenhancements.com/index.html Expand +1 for the auto step! We puled out the horrible suction step retract, and put that in when I ripped out my vacuum system 2 years ago. Wired it to my beacon switch, which drives the step only now, since my nav beacon on the bottom was replaced with an appropriate red/white strobe. As part of my runup checklists I now have: Passenger Step: Confirm UP It's so nice. 1 Quote
sdflysurf Posted March 24, 2021 Author Report Posted March 24, 2021 On 3/23/2021 at 10:43 PM, 0TreeLemur said: Your wing leveler won't work without your Brittain DG unless you also have a Brittain gyro/valve system in the tail. I think that is an older (pre '67 models or older) feature. @takair has an electric step actuator that replaces the vacuum actuated retraction system. Might was well go all in with the vacuumless system. Expand The DG was strictly vacuum - didn't seem to have any connection to the PC system and it wasn't doing so well (precessing - so I am happy to have it replaced with the G5) The Brittain Turn Co-ordinator is the only thing that works the PC wing leveler that I see. Quote
RobertGary1 Posted March 25, 2021 Report Posted March 25, 2021 Put the AI back in and enjoy an extra free backup attitude indicator. When it dies then toss it. Also when the DPE covers up the attitude indicator you still have a full HSI and don't need to revert it. Quote
Bob E Posted March 25, 2021 Report Posted March 25, 2021 I did basically the same thing - removed the vacuum instruments for dual G5's - but I also removed the entire vacuum system. I lashed the step in the up position with the intent of getting a Flight Enhancements electric step conversion later, but so far I haven't seen any need for the step. The PC wing leveler was more trouble that it was worth -- expensive to replace the boots, not to mention the gyro (which is in the back in my '65), and I don't miss it at all. Now I don't have to worry about vacuum failures or gyro overhauls. (Except for the one remaining electric gyro: the turn & slip.) Quote
tony Posted July 11, 2021 Report Posted July 11, 2021 On 3/25/2021 at 7:33 AM, Bob E said: .....but I also removed the entire vacuum system. Expand For your awareness: I researched this for a friend a while back. The TCDS says that the vacuum pump is required for IFR flight, but optional for VFR flight. This note applies to models up to a G. I understand the logic of your decision, but I would like you to also understand the legal ramifications as well. ref: http://www.accelerationtech.com/photos/mooney/TypeCert/FAA-Type-Cert-Mooney-2A3.pdf Quote
Ragsf15e Posted July 11, 2021 Report Posted July 11, 2021 (edited) On 7/11/2021 at 2:38 PM, tony said: For your awareness: I researched this for a friend a while back. The TCDS says that the vacuum pump is required for IFR flight, but optional for VFR flight. This note applies to models up to a G. I understand the logic of your decision, but I would like you to also understand the legal ramifications as well. ref: http://www.accelerationtech.com/photos/mooney/TypeCert/FAA-Type-Cert-Mooney-2A3.pdf Expand Except you have to read very far down in the tcds notes, the “small print”. There’s an allowance to remove the vacuum for all models equipped with appropriate certified electronic ADI systems. your link is from 2002, and potentially not current. Heres the current faa: https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/6ea0f05ecca8304486258305006833cf/$FILE/2A3_Rev_58.pdf Edited July 11, 2021 by Ragsf15e Quote
RobertGary1 Posted July 11, 2021 Report Posted July 11, 2021 On 3/23/2021 at 10:29 PM, sdflysurf said: I've removed my AI and DG from my vacuum system to install dual G5 Can I remove my suction gauge and my VAC low and VAC high indicators? Also is there anything I should do to make sure the proper suction pressure is still there and it isn't too strong? I plan to measure. The only thing left is the PC wing leveler system and the retractable step. Expand Having had dual AHRS failures in Garmin gear I would say the vacuum system is an amazingly inexpensive way to have backup attitude. I didn’t and won’t remove mine with dual 275’s. Quote
Ragsf15e Posted July 11, 2021 Report Posted July 11, 2021 On 7/11/2021 at 2:38 PM, tony said: For your awareness: I researched this for a friend a while back. The TCDS says that the vacuum pump is required for IFR flight, but optional for VFR flight. This note applies to models up to a G. I understand the logic of your decision, but I would like you to also understand the legal ramifications as well. ref: http://www.accelerationtech.com/photos/mooney/TypeCert/FAA-Type-Cert-Mooney-2A3.pdf Expand Here’s the note. The tcds you cited is from 2002, current is 2018 on the faa website. 1 Quote
tony Posted July 11, 2021 Report Posted July 11, 2021 On 7/11/2021 at 4:05 PM, Ragsf15e said: Except you have to read very far down in the tcds notes, the “small print”. There’s an allowance to remove the vacuum for all models equipped with appropriate certified electronic ADI systems. your link is from 2002, and potentially not current. Heres the current faa: https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/6ea0f05ecca8304486258305006833cf/$FILE/2A3_Rev_58.pdf Expand Rags, thanks!! I see note 24. I'll pass along the info. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.