Jump to content

Modifications - do they work as claimed?


Recommended Posts

I have a 1962 Mooney.  I am considering various modifications, including the 201 Window upgrade and various gap seals etc.  Does anyone have any before and after experience with any speed modification to know whether the expected speed increases are correct?  I did the cowl modification and it worked as advertised with a 3-4 mph speed increase.  I am planning to paint my airplane and do an interior renovation. 


Thanks


 


 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum!  I'm just down the road from you and know of several other Mooney owners in the area.  Last year we did a fly-out lunch to K81 (Paola) for BBQ one weekend and should try to make that a regular activity.


The biggest speed mods for the early planes are the 201 windshield and cowl conversions.  There are lots of cowl mods, from the simple "cowl closure" that reduces the big fish mouth, to a scab-on closure/snout that mimics a 201 geometry and uses a 201 spinner, to hybrids of the pre-201 cowl that almost duplicate the 201 cowl, and then there are full 201 cowl conversions.  (in order from least expensive to most expensive)  If you are going to paint and do the interior, then it would be a great opportunity to replace all of the windows and do the 201 windshield...it will get you a few more MPH as well as a nice amount of storage space on the glareshield for maps and such.


I'm getting ready to paint very soon and I just orderd overlapping nose gear doors (my originals are worn anyway), the later model dorsal fin/empennage fairing, and rudder/elevator hinge covers.  Those might net me a couple of knots, maybe.


Gap seals all-around will help your early bird too, and don't cost a bunch.  You might go shopping here:  http://www.lasar.com/mods.asp or http://www.swta.net/mooneyproductinfo/mooneymodpackages.html or http://www.mooneymart.com/Frames/Intro/introduction_to_mmmods.htm to start your wish list.  FYI, you cannot add all of the individual speed gains up and get a believable number. :)


If you can only do one thing, I would do the windshield and then go after the others as your budget allows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information. I go to K81 all the time.  I already have the cowl closure and found it worked as claimed and am now considering doing the SWTA 201 window modification. Just checking around to see if others found it to add some mph.  Thanks


Rgaines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The brake caliper reversal is about 1 mph in reality.  I agree that the 201 windshield is the best mod in terms of speed for the $$$.  I have several of the mods (gap seals, tail and wing fairing, brake rotation, powerflow, 201 windshield, ari full cowl/nose mod, 201 spinner, k&n air filter), and computed the cost the the former owner of my plane at $1500-$1800 per mph on my airplane. 


For my $$$ I would do the windshield first, the cowl mod second, and the powerflow third.  I would most likely skip the rest and put the $$$ into the panel.


Aaron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've mentioned before any E/F model I buy will pretty much have to already have a 201 windshield at a minimum. If that were the only mod done I would take it upon myself to add the lower cowl enclosure and that's about it. Though this caliper rotation sounds interesting, I would probably look into that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My Mooney is due for it's annual on 15 October. I'm having the brake caliper reversal done as well as the cowl closure mod. Next year I will do the oil cooler relocation and some upgrades in the panel.


BTW, can anyone tell me what the single side window mod consists of? It does wonders in terms of looks on the F model, but I was quoted ZAR27k - that's almost $3400! I though it would just be a simple cut away of the center piece splitting the two exisiting side windows and fitting a one piece window, but looking at the quoted price, there seems to be much more to it?


My Mooney only achieves a TAS of around 138kts at 8000ft - full throttle, 2500rpm, 50deg ROP. I will test it again after the annual to see if there's any noticable speed increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I did my mods all at once , I did the cowl closure ,flap and aileron gap seals , brake rotation ,gear bay liners and wing root cuffs...  I got about 10 to 11 mph out of all of them , but the cowl closure is the most bang for the buck , it got about 4 mph...  That is the only one I tried separately...  I get 140 knots indicated airspeed at 2400 rpm and 24 inches of mercury..  My best speed is about 8500 feet msl at 2400 rpm and about 19 to 20 inches hg and my ground trac is about 151 to 153 knots with about 125 kts indicated airspeed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I ended up only doing the Lasar lower cowl closure mod. Nothing changed except for the engine running cooler. Certainly no noticeable speed increase in my situation. Next annual, I'm going to skip all the minor mods and do the 201 windshield. No use spending money to score some extra speed without it actually happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these mods will have some minor speed improvement but in order to see the effect you have to fly the plane at max power (2700rpm/30") and at 1000 feet. At 10,000 feet at 65% you will not notice any difference unless it is a turbo mod addition. The reason is drag. Drag has a greater effect at the higher power settings and lower altitudes. So if you are dissappointed by your new mod try it at the lower altitudes and get a magnifying glas over your air IAS to see the difference.


José  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All my mods were installed by prior owners, so I don't know how effective they were. I do know that my log books show that the flap hinge fairings were installed, but they're not there. This says to me that they didn't amount to any speed advantage and just got in the way, so off they went. proof of the pudding is the fact that when Mooney built the Acclaim with intent to capture the highest piston speed title, they didn't bother with hinge fairings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know my windshield mod gave me a few knots. But more importantly it looks a helluva lot better and makes the cabin quieter than it was before with the single piece 1/4" thick window. Also some of the mods, such as the wheel well liners, not sure if they help with speed so much as when it comes time to clean out the wheel well...its just much easier and looks better. Not that people typically get down and look at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote: flight2000

I had the LASAR 201 Windshield installed on mine for just under $3.5K (parts and labor).  Best Mod I did out of all of them.  If you want the guys name that did the mod for me, just send me a PM.  He's based out of San Antonio, TX and it takes about two weeks to complete.

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote: rgaines

I have a 1962 Mooney.  I am considering various modifications, including the 201 Window upgrade and various gap seals etc.  Does anyone have any before and after experience with any speed modification to know whether the expected speed increases are correct?  I did the cowl modification and it worked as advertised with a 3-4 mph speed increase.  I am planning to paint my airplane and do an interior renovation. 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.