Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, I’m replacing some very old circuit breakers that are causing voltage drop between my alternator and my main bus.  Unfortunately I can’t see a modern equivalent part number for the 70 amp alternator circuit breaker in the maintenance manual.  The breaker itself looks like this (MS39065-3).

63198E55-9565-488E-B867-E47D2CBDCBFA.thumb.jpeg.2cc91e0daa4e5248019040bebca39597.jpeg

I’d also like to have the 50amp aux bus breaker on hand.  It looks like a standard klixon, but I can’t quite see the part number?

EC7FC9C0-BE72-4F7F-A6DD-ECA21EF0EDAE.thumb.jpeg.057ef97e8c1859f0ce7265d9f618d0e1.jpeg

Posted
2 hours ago, EricJ said:

The top one appears to be a PDLM-70.   

 

Ahh, thanks.  PDLM seems to be the magic letters I couldn’t find.  That comes up easily on Spruce.  Now if it wasn’t $220, that would be terrific!

Thanks for the help!

The other one is either a Tyco or Klixon 50 amp.  One is $22, one is $184.  I’m just not lucky enough for it to be the $22.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Yetti said:

The -3 usually means 3 amp. 

Not is this case.  MS39065 is a long cancelled MIL spec.  The -3 denotes 70 Amp:

 

53D99447-B562-4055-880D-DA5F81D1B589.jpeg

Edited by MikeOH
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, MikeOH said:

Not is this case.  MS39065 is a long cancelled MIL spec.  The -3 denotes 70 Amp:

 

53D99447-B562-4055-880D-DA5F81D1B589.jpeg

Nice, where’d you find that?  That’s it for sure, but I think the new part is the PDLM that @EricJ said.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Ragsf15e said:

Nice, where’d you find that?  That’s it for sure, but I think the new part is the PDLM that @EricJ said.

Very useful site for military specs, both old and current: https://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsSearch.aspx

In the case of this part it gets even worse, the suggested spec, MIL-C-13516/4 was also cancelled!  In that spec, you will find that there is not a subsequent MIL spec, but a reference to a CID(Commercial item description), AA55571/04-004 , of which PDLM-70 is, I believe, conforming (but, you'd need to verify that part's specifications to the CID number to be certain.  (Sorry, I'm too lazy to track that down!)

 

4883DD7C-3F24-44FD-9C66-D2EBB359F95D.png

Edited by MikeOH
Posted
21 hours ago, MikeOH said:

Not is this case.  MS39065 is a long cancelled MIL spec.  The -3 denotes 70 Amp:

 

53D99447-B562-4055-880D-DA5F81D1B589.jpeg

Sometimes can maybe or not

Posted
Just now, Yetti said:

Sometimes can maybe or not

You said, "usually means" And, I said, "Not in this case"

What are you getting at with this post????

Posted
7 minutes ago, MikeOH said:

You said, "usually means" And, I said, "Not in this case"

What are you getting at with this post????

Working on my appropriate disclaimer or maybe should have added when working with Potter Brumfield or Klixon

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.