JLew Posted Monday at 03:17 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:17 PM Hi Folks. New to the forum. Airline driver who grew up GA. Been experimenting with different configurations for flying various instrument approaches. With the low gear and even lower flap speeds on a 65 E model this becomes problematic. Gear almost always has to precede flaps. Nothing wrong with that, but thought I would solicit some input from the group. Here's what Ive come up with. Slow to 120 mph (VLE) prior to approach, prior to descent, gear down and 1800 RPM flaps up. Target 100 mph. (VFE) Once inside FAF, approach flaps (half) and target 90 mph until breaking out. That allows enough time to cross the fence at 80 mph. Thanks in advance. J Quote
BrianWilkins Posted Monday at 04:06 PM Report Posted Monday at 04:06 PM What you’re describing is almost identical to my process with the exception that rather than target 1800 RPM, I’m usually prop full forward (high RPM) and about 17” MP. Otherwise, the speeds, etc are exactly what I do. Quote
Ragsf15e Posted Monday at 06:07 PM Report Posted Monday at 06:07 PM 2 hours ago, JLew said: Hi Folks. New to the forum. Airline driver who grew up GA. Been experimenting with different configurations for flying various instrument approaches. With the low gear and even lower flap speeds on a 65 E model this becomes problematic. Gear almost always has to precede flaps. Nothing wrong with that, but thought I would solicit some input from the group. Here's what Ive come up with. Slow to 120 mph (VLE) prior to approach, prior to descent, gear down and 1800 RPM flaps up. Target 100 mph. (VFE) Once inside FAF, approach flaps (half) and target 90 mph until breaking out. That allows enough time to cross the fence at 80 mph. Thanks in advance. J I do exactly what you have as well. There are others that might stay flaps up (but gear down) for two reasons: 1. In the event of MA, flaps down and full power can cause a lot of pitch up pressure. It’s not terrible with only TO flaps but you should practice it. 2. You can stay a little faster (~100) with flaps up on the ILS which might feel more stable. Upon breaking out on glideslope, slowing down isn’t normally a problem (unlike your airliner). After considering those, I do what you described. 1 Quote
PeteMc Posted Monday at 08:15 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:15 PM Same thing for me. Figure out the MP setting for your plane that will give you the speed you want in the descent with the gear down. Then set for that power well before the FAF. About a half dot before intercepting the GS/GP I drop the gear and you start down as you intercept the GS/GP. Then, as the others have said, when you break out you can easily adjust the power to slow and add flaps as needed. Quote
M20F Posted Monday at 10:29 PM Report Posted Monday at 10:29 PM 7 hours ago, JLew said: Airline driver who grew up GA. A piston is much more impacted by power = altitude and pitch = speed than a jet due to its infinitely less power (though more responsive power). While it is possible to set and forget throttle/pitch on a piston, it isn’t probable. Quote
47U Posted Tuesday at 05:10 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:10 AM 13 hours ago, JLew said: Once inside FAF, approach flaps (half) and target 90 mph until breaking out. That allows enough time to cross the fence at 80 mph That works just fine, but the airplane lands with no issues flaps up, which simplifies a missed approach option. I flew my practice approaches at 90 kts, which is above the flap speed. No flaps approaches puts less stress on the aft center spar spice. Have you inspected for cracks IAW M20-217? Quote
TaildraggerPilot Posted Tuesday at 06:18 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:18 AM (edited) I get a 3 degree glide path around 90 MPH with gear down, no flaps, full prop and 13.3 MP. Edited Tuesday at 06:19 AM by TaildraggerPilot 1 Quote
Utah20Gflyer Posted Tuesday at 07:12 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 07:12 AM 100 mph and clean configuration before I get to the FAF. For me this is 16” MAP. When I need to start the descent I drop the gear and put in half flaps and get the plane configured for landing. This will give me a 500 fpm decent rate which I fine tune with slight throttle changes. After some practice I don’t have any issues making a normal landing from 200 AGL and 100 mph, although it usually requires chopping the power to idle and aggressively trimming nose up to get me to the 80 mph I’m looking for over the threshold. The extra 20 mph is just the extra energy you need to maintain a consistent decent rate while also slowing down. 2 Quote
bigmo Posted yesterday at 05:58 AM Report Posted yesterday at 05:58 AM Yours (OP) and the others are all pretty great starting points to learn how your a/ c behaves. I generally fly RNAVs vice ILS. I keep speeds up and stay clean through the procedure turn. Once inbound, and 2 miles from the FAF, I go full prop and 17” MP, at a mile before, drop my gear, 1/2 flaps, and MP about 15” and trim for 90. At the FAF, I nose over, another inch off MP and it follows vertical guidance in a nice predictable manner about 85+. When I’m 5ish feet off the runway, I chop the power, hold the nose up a bit and just let it settle down on its own. I usually am a few hundred feet long, but can put it down if runways length is a concern (rarely is). This works to the point I never get off my vertical guidance and the plane feels stable at 85ish all the way in. Ive made it a habit to check my gear light and floor indicator three more times inside the FAF. It’s just habbit. Quote
Pinecone Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Just realize those are all starting numbers. Wind will require more power (headwind) or less (tailwind). Quote
Skates97 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago These are my settings in my 65 M20D. They get you close and then adjust for wind as @Pinecone mentioned. I don't add flaps until after breaking out and then slowing to 100 (Vfe). Approach Settings.xlsx Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.