Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

.............. forgot to ask if anyone has installed ANY of the electonic mag companies out there? Not just the SureFly, ie. Electroair

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, FlyingVAce said:

.............. forgot to ask if anyone has installed ANY of the electonic mag companies out there? Not just the SureFly, ie. Electroair

Yes, we have lots of threads on this.  I’ve had a Surefly for ~4 years on an io-360.  We have people with them on turbos and even someone that has two.  Whatvtype of engine do you have?  What would you like to know?

Here’s a really old thread :

 

 

Edited by Ragsf15e
Posted

I installed one in a 182.    It worked fine.  The engine (Continental O-470L ) started a bit easier with that mag.    Not enough performance difference to be noticeable.   It did show slightly better fuel usage (either reduced fuel burn or increased speed) but it was such a small amount I could only tell through careful measurement.   Although I could run a little leaner at low power settings (wide open throttle above 10,000 MSL) where it wouldn't run smoothly before.

I could tell which one was which when doing the mag checks both on the ground and in the air.   Turning off the regular mag did next to nothing, a slight rise in EGT.  Turning off the electronic ignition had a much bigger effect.

Posted

plenty of info regarding Surefly available with search.  Would suggest google search "Surefly site:mooneyspace.com"

In general, I have read mostly good experiences with Surefly.  Most benefit felt to be with single electronic "mag".  Set timing that doesn't drift, ability to advance timing with low MP for normally aspirated engines, smoother LOP if you can fly LOP, easier starts due to immediate spark, 2400 hr TBO so no need for 500hr IRAN.  Given you are paying equivalent cost for new mag you should time it ideally with needing to replace a mag or when you come up on IRAN time.

Anecdotally I've read more difficulties with Electroair vs Surefly.  I have a Surefly on my M20K and have about 200 hrs on it; fixed timing, smoother and deeper LOP, easy hot starts (but this wasn't that difficult before, but a little quicker/easier after), no complaints.

Early Surefly had issues with too low of voltage spike set point/regulation which required capacitor addition.  This was fixed by about revision C.  Also early Surefly had longer reset time when you turned it off; so on mag checks at runup there would be a stumble or hesitation.  This has been fixed with quicker restart time.  My runups are very similar for both mag and surefly.  Pax probably doesn't realize a difference.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.