Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

this is great news.  While I didn't go with this option, it's a pretty cool solution considering the ADSB in options they are working on as well.  -K

Posted

I'm always curious how stuff like this went down.   Did the acquisition of Aerovonix bring with it some patents that were threatening to Garmin, so they reached detente?   Did the uAvionix financial backers spread some influence into the equation?   There are all sorts of intriguing possibilities.

Usually the reality is a bit more boring, but the speculation is fun.  ;)

Sounds like a victory for uAvionix to me.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Immelman said:

Perhaps the uavionix patent was strong enough and Garmin ended up merely shaking them down?

It would be interesting to know.

Me too. I would love to know the settlement details. Alas...

Posted
4 hours ago, moontownMooney said:

I couldnt see this going any other way once the uAvionix patent was granted while the lawsuit was underway.
 

Plus any patents they acquired with Aerovonix, so there was probably a good basis to just settle everything with a cross-licensing agreement.

Posted
On 10/18/2019 at 2:29 PM, EricJ said:

Plus any patents they acquired with Aerovonix, so there was probably a good basis to just settle everything with a cross-licensing agreement.

Yep some sort of cross licensing and In Garmin’s best interest to keep a competitor or two so as to not appear monopolistic 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.