Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When I set out to buy a Mooney soon, I will be searching for one between 69 and 77. Do planes in this range have a 12 volt or 24 volt system?

Gerbil

Posted
17 hours ago, Gerbil said:

When I set out to buy a Mooney soon, I will be searching for one between 69 and 77. Do planes in this range have a 12 volt or 24 volt system?

Gerbil

Curious why you are restricting yourself to those years.

I went to a MAPA Homecoming back around 1997 with my first Mooney, a 1967 M20C.  One of the old timers I met there said, "Oh, you got one of the good ones."  I enquired why that was, and he said that the 65-67 models with square windows and updated interior was a nice change to the previous.  It was also before the company went into bankruptcy, was sold, and before the pot smoking started in the early 1970's.

No kidding.

BTW, I love my 64 M20C even better than the '67..

Posted

I've been very happy with my 65 M20D (really a C but that seems to bother some when I call it that... :P)

I think about how well it flies and travels and for my typical trips of 300-500nm I can see myself flying this plane for a long time.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just did PGA TUS PGA over the last 2 days 289 kts between in my 64 D/C

9500 down 10.5 back (density 12,5)     Smooth as glass most of the way

 137 Kts TAS  (NOT G/S)  Averaged between both flights. I don't really care about G/S until it gets too slow (<110 kts)

10 gallons first hour  9 gallons second hour both ways.  

Hard to beat C for the economy - Cost of entry/KT cruise speed  or Cost of knot at cruise speed. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, cliffy said:

289 kts

Wow, you must have some sweet speed mods, even the TBMs have to get out of your way :)

 

Posted

I liked my 66 E more than my 64 E, and I love my 64-400 more than both of my E models.

Clarence

Posted
2 hours ago, M20Doc said:

I liked my 66 E more than my 64 E, and I love my 64-400 more than both of my E models.

Clarence

Any more of that, Clarence, and I'll ask for a wall on our northern border too!

^_^

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/26/2017 at 0:11 AM, Andy95W said:

Curious why you are restricting yourself to those years.

I went to a MAPA Homecoming back around 1997 with my first Mooney, a 1967 M20C.  One of the old timers I met there said, "Oh, you got one of the good ones."  I enquired why that was, and he said that the 65-67 models with square windows and updated interior was a nice change to the previous.  It was also before the company went into bankruptcy, was sold, and before the pot smoking started in the early 1970's.

No kidding.

BTW, I love my 64 M20C even better than the '67..

I have my reasons.... I want electric gear and quadrant controls.

Thanks for the helpful responses. 14 volt system it is.

Gerbil

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/25/2017 at 11:30 PM, cliffy said:

Just did PGA TUS PGA over the last 2 days 289 kts between in my 64 D/C

9500 down 10.5 back (density 12,5)     Smooth as glass most of the way

 137 Kts TAS  (NOT G/S)  Averaged between both flights. I don't really care about G/S until it gets too slow (<110 kts)

10 gallons first hour  9 gallons second hour both ways.  

Hard to beat C for the economy - Cost of entry/KT cruise speed  or Cost of knot at cruise speed. 

I'm just the opposite from you.  I really don't care about TAS I like ground speed this is what gets you to your destination.  TAS just moves you thorough the air and indicated air speed gets you off the ground and back for landing.:)

  • Like 2
Posted
On ‎8‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 6:43 AM, M20Doc said:

I liked my 66 E more than my 64 E, and I love my 64-400 more than both of my E models.

Clarence

That's because you have both of their engines strapped up front as one. Since there are only a few of these acid rainmakers, you probably dodged a Lycoming/accounting/legal bullet of a potential crank ad also :) 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.