A64Pilot Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) On 1/6/2025 at 1:48 PM, gabez said: how does it work if an STC is used but Textron says no? where does the liability fall to? STC holder and Owner and maybe the IA. I’m no Laywer but they would go after Textron too I’m sure and if they could show Textron was negligent then of course they would also pay. Remember the Cirrus that ran into some building in NY? The lawsuit among others named Hartzell, I guess if the prop hadn’t pulled them into the building they would still be alive? Edited 18 hours ago by A64Pilot Quote
aviatoreb Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 3 hours ago, A64Pilot said: STC holder and Owner and maybe the IA. I’m no Laywer but they would go after Textron too I’m sure and if they could show Textron was negligent then of course they would also pay. Remember the Cirrus that ran into some building in NY? The lawsuit among others named Hartzell, I guess if the prop hadn’t pulled them into the building they would still be alive? What about his sneakers? If he hadnt had a pair of good footwear I bet he wouldnt have gone to the airport that day. Not to mention his toothbrush. Quote
GeeBee Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 7 hours ago, A64Pilot said: STC holder and Owner and maybe the IA. I’m no Laywer but they would go after Textron too I’m sure and if they could show Textron was negligent then of course they would also pay. Remember the Cirrus that ran into some building in NY? The lawsuit among others named Hartzell, I guess if the prop hadn’t pulled them into the building they would still be alive? The standard practice is to sue everybody and let the trial sort it out. You never know what will happen in discovery and thus you name anyone and everyone then let the chips fall. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.