PilotX Posted December 30, 2021 Report Posted December 30, 2021 Got a call from a friend, they are putting a G1000 M20M on line for rent. Sounds like the rate is $325ish. They are touting it as a 220kt airplane. I told him to fly it like that and they will be putting a new engine on it in short order. I guess that is what rental cars are for, best off-road vehicles ever made. Sent him my LOP numbers, I bet the experience requirements will keep most renters away but I can't imagine letting a flight school touch Miss Daisy. I just gave a hangar key to a friend but he flew it like a pro so I am not worried. Quote
LANCECASPER Posted December 31, 2021 Report Posted December 31, 2021 Just the checkout flight with an instructor would be a great opportunity for someone who wanted to see before buying what a Mooney feels like and especially what a turbo Mooney feels like. 2 Quote
carusoam Posted December 31, 2021 Report Posted December 31, 2021 Insurance for that situation must be interesting… -a- 1 Quote
Rick Junkin Posted December 31, 2021 Report Posted December 31, 2021 17 hours ago, PilotX said: Sounds like the rate is $325ish. This also gives prospective Mooney owner/pilots a good gauge of M20M ownership costs. My fully encumbered hourly cost of operation based on a minimum of 120 hours per year is right at $350/hour. Add another 100hr/year and it drops to $250/hr, but of course adds an additional $25K to the annual encumbered operating costs. I'm with @carusoam, the insurance policy must be interesting/pricey. Only named insureds permitted? Cheers, Rick 1 Quote
PilotX Posted December 31, 2021 Author Report Posted December 31, 2021 1 hour ago, Junkman said: This also gives prospective Mooney owner/pilots a good gauge of M20M ownership costs. My fully encumbered hourly cost of operation based on a minimum of 120 hours per year is right at $350/hour. Add another 100hr/year and it drops to $250/hr, but of course adds an additional $25K to the annual encumbered operating costs. I'm with @carusoam, the insurance policy must be interesting/pricey. Only named insureds permitted? Cheers, Rick No idea. I think they are still working it out. The new owner is a low time pilot from what I heard. Quote
tgardnerh Posted January 1, 2022 Report Posted January 1, 2022 Add another 100hr/year and it drops to $250/hr, but of course adds an additional $25K to the annual encumbered operating costs.I think all-in hourly averages are not great to calculate once you've committed to the buy vs rent decision, because the number we care about is how much the next hour will cost. Based on those numbers, it looks like you're paying about $26k/year to keep the airplane airworthy, and then about $130/hr to fly around. Which is why "cost per additional hour" is always the number *I* emphasize to my wife. Edit to change what part i quoted to match my point better. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 3 Quote
rbp Posted January 3, 2022 Report Posted January 3, 2022 it was marketed as a 220KTAS airplane at FL250. i don't remember the engine settings, but probably BTTW. EDIT: I mean 220KTAS (not 200). still don't know what power settings Quote
LANCECASPER Posted January 3, 2022 Report Posted January 3, 2022 21 minutes ago, rbp said: it was marketed as a 200KTAS airplane at FL250. i don't remember the engine settings, but probably BTTW. Mooney marketed it as a 220 knot airplane at FL250. In Sept. 1996 Flying quoted Mooney specs in their article about the new Bravo (the Bravo engine had come out earlier that year). Â 1 Quote
Bravoman Posted January 4, 2022 Report Posted January 4, 2022 Even if was doable somehow insurance wise, no way in a million years would I ever put a Bravo into a rental fleet. Quote
Vance Harral Posted January 4, 2022 Report Posted January 4, 2022 On 12/30/2021 at 4:29 PM, PilotX said: Got a call from a friend, they are putting a G1000 M20M on line for rent. What airport and flight school/flying club? Quote
flyboy0681 Posted January 4, 2022 Report Posted January 4, 2022 On 12/30/2021 at 11:36 PM, carusoam said: Insurance for that situation must be interesting… -a- Killjoy  2 Quote
PilotX Posted January 4, 2022 Author Report Posted January 4, 2022 It’s in Centennial I don’t see it online yet. 2 Quote
xcrmckenna Posted February 16, 2022 Report Posted February 16, 2022 It’s in Centennial I don’t see it online yet.I’m very interested in getting a chance to rent a Bravo for some real world seat time in prep for a new plane. I see foreflight lists 6 flying schools at Centennial. Any chance you know what rental company is thinking about adding the Bravo, then I can watch for the addition. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
PilotX Posted February 22, 2022 Author Report Posted February 22, 2022 On 1/3/2022 at 9:54 PM, Vance Harral said: What airport and flight school/flying club? Centennial Flyers I think. 2 Quote
xcrmckenna Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 Centennial Flyers I think. Thank you, I’ll keep an eye on them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
mike_elliott Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 On 12/30/2021 at 6:29 PM, PilotX said: Got a call from a friend, they are putting a G1000 M20M There are not a lot of them in existence Quote
LANCECASPER Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 35 minutes ago, mike_elliott said: There are not a lot of them in existence They made 20 of them in 2005 (27-0331 to 27-0350). I know they made at least 5 in 2006. The Bravo GX is very rare. Quote
Danb Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 I believe 318 is a GX my GX is 326, I believe one or two others before number 28-331Â Quote
LANCECASPER Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 1 hour ago, Danb said: I believe 318 is a GX my GX is 326, I believe one or two others before number 28-331Â Thanks! Could very well be that those were 2004 models. I knew that they made some DX's and thought that they made some some GX's in 2004, but didn't know how many of each that they made. EDIT: You're right about 27-0318. It's actually considered a 2003 Mooney Bravo GX. It looks like 317 was not a GX, so 318 was probably the first GX. Quote
Danb Posted February 22, 2022 Report Posted February 22, 2022 23 minutes ago, LANCECASPER said: Thanks! Could very well be that those were 2004 models. I knew that they made some DX's and thought that they made some some GX's in 2004, but didn't know how many of each that they made. EDIT: You're right about 27-0318. It's actually considered a 2003 Mooney Bravo GX. It looks like 317 was not a GX, so 318 was probably the first GX. Mine was marketed as a  2005 built in late 2004, I got ticked off when I bought it they represented it as a 2005, for what it’s worth I had Mooney enter in the log  it was a 2005 for what it’s worth. I think 318 was the test bed for the g1000, has the GFC 700 and other stuff, was then refurbished and renewed at the factory and sold as a 2004/2007 1 Quote
xcrmckenna Posted February 23, 2022 Report Posted February 23, 2022 They have the Bravo on the rental line. I just requested a membership packet. Hopefully in a week or two I’ll have a pirep on how they are suggesting how to fly the Bravo. What I got from the ad it just says a top speed of 220knots. And is just an advertisement, not really and expectation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
donkaye Posted February 23, 2022 Report Posted February 23, 2022 I wouldn't want to be the insurance company that insures that airplane unless the annual insurance fee is the cost of the airplane. Â An Acclaim was put on the line at Palo Alto a number of years ago. Â 3 prop strikes later the plane went into default and was repossessed. Â Who would ever want it after all those prop strikes? Â I brought it back from Kerrville before it went on the line. Â It looked good then. Â A couple of years later it looked like your typical rental plane---garbage. Â The only beneficiaries may be the renters who don't give a cr*p about the plane, want to go fast, and will destroy the engine in short order. Â On top of everything else, with the altitude in Denver, landings will be at least 10% faster than at sea level and may expedite the first prop strike. It's a fools errand to put any long body Mooney on the line, expecting to make money while cutting their own flying expenses. Â They are in for a real eye opening experience. Â After 30 years' experience with the Bravo, there is so much more I could say, but it would likely just fall on deaf ears. 3 Quote
xcrmckenna Posted February 23, 2022 Report Posted February 23, 2022 I wouldn't want to be the insurance company that insures that airplane unless the annual insurance fee is the cost of the airplane. Â An Acclaim was put on the line at Palo Alto a number of years ago. Â 3 prop strikes later the plane went into default and was repossessed. Â Who would ever want it after all those prop strikes? Â I brought it back from Kerrville before it went on the line. Â It looked good then. Â A couple of years later it looked like your typical rental plane---garbage. Â The only beneficiaries may be the renters who don't give a cr*p about the plane, want to go fast, and will destroy the engine is short order. Â On top of everything else, with the altitude in Denver, landings will be at least 10% faster than at sea level and may expedite the first prop strike. It's a fools errand to put any long body Mooney on the line, expecting to make money while cutting their own flying expenses. Â They are in for a real eye opening experience. Â After 30 years' experience with the Bravo, there is so much more I could say, but it would likely just fall on deaf ears.Very true, when I get down there I will make sure I promote your landing CD and instructions. Hopefully it might make the Bravo last a little longer for them Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote
BravoWhiskey Posted February 23, 2022 Report Posted February 23, 2022 I wouldn’t mind renting it when I’m in Denver in a few weeks… maybe take a mountain flying course in it… 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.