Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wish Jennifer Mitchell lived in Kansas!  I would *love* to meet her...but there is no way this Texas boy is ever moving to California.  :)


I'm an aero engineer and have worked at Cirrus and Columbia for short stints, then Boeing and now Spirit AeroSystems (the old Boeing-Wichita commercial division).  My specialty is composite structures, and I have years of factory support experience dealing with composite production problems.  I promise you that factory production with prepreg systems and  quality tooling is *far* different than your Cozy and EZ experience.  The only thing they have in common is some chemistry!  Assuming you design it well *for* composite materials, then you can really drastically cut the labor for fabrication *and* assembly.  Hopefully more than enough to offset the higher price of the raw materials.  In this day and age, it is easy to do.  I am very confident that Cirrus/Diamond/Cessna man-hours per plane are a fraction of what Mooney does.  Today it is the labor hours that are keeping Mooney prices up, and I really don't see any way to drastically reduce them to the point where they could do a $300k MSE unless they moved out of the country.


Mooney very well might have resisted any efforts to iron out inefficiencies in their production line...I have no idea.  I just feel at the end of the day there are too many welds, too many rivets, too much goopy sealant, etc. to get their man-hours down to a Cirrus/Diamond/Cessna level.  Hopefully I'm wrong though!  If companies like Porsche and Cigarette boats can keep going, then so should Mooney!

Posted

George, Thanks for your toughts on how Mooney could improve their business :


 


1. I find the remake of their current website good enough! Maybe your writing was before the remake of their site ? 


2. I do not believe Mooney will get more customers because they have a BRS fitted, the pilots who fly a Mooney don't want the extra weight of this parachute that might not work at all when you would need it. 


3. Cirrus has a marketing budget that is 50x bigger than Mooney's, as many people said, Cirrus is a marketing machine, real pilots don't buy Cirrus planes. I personally hate the plastic sh*t. 


4. A stripped version with a io-360 and a G600 could maybe work, but making a new plane who has a lower margin would not work IMHO 


5. a 6 seater Pressurised with the RR R500 engine could be a winner, price it at 1M$ with a MTOW below 1999kg and you have a real winner. Just like the JetpropDLX is, it would be a compatitor for a Meridian. even if they just bring out a 4 seater non-pressurised R500 turboprop for a price of around 500k$ that could be a winner too. The price of the R500 is to be set slightly above the price of a TSIO-550 (only 20.000$more some sources say) 

Posted

Quote: M20BE

Ah sorry :-)

PS: we need emicons !!

 We have emicons CoolTongue out

Always have actually. Use the little smily button on the toolbar of the post editor.  Note that you won't have this option with the Quick Reply box at the bottom of the topic - you need to use the full editor from clicking "Reply" or "Quote"

Wink

post-3-1346813720321_thumb.jpg

Posted

Quote: M20BE

Thanks, could you add 'QUOTE' there also please ? I usually copy paste some text between 'quote' marks

 I don't 100% understand this one.  You want a button to just add quote marks...like " and "?

Thre is already a link by each post to quote the other poster (like I used above to quote your post).  But I am not sure if that is what you are referring to...

 

Posted

Okay, what do you make of this when it comes to Mooney? RR wants this powerplant to operate 13fl to 15fl, certified to 22fl. Kind of makes you go "hmmmmmm."  


 


McStealth

Posted

Quote: Mcstealth

Okay, what do you make of this when it comes to Mooney? RR wants this powerplant to operate 13fl to 15fl, certified to 22fl. Kind of makes you go "hmmmmmm."  

 

McStealth

Posted

Quote: mooniac227

AVWEB produced a video of an interview with a rep from Rolls Royce at the AOPA show.  It's on YouTube:

Assuming these estimates are at least in the right zip-code; this would yield the following specific fuel consumption figures:

Mooney Turboprop - 255 ktas @ 25k - (.604 lbs/nm or 11.1 nm/gal)   220 ktas @12k - (1.09 lbs/nm or 7.3 nm/gal)

Posted

Okay, please put that into some perspective/comparision. What does the Meridian do? Acclaim? What is the smallest S/E turboprop out there right now? How does that compare? I know it is pure speculation on our part but that is where it gets fun.


McStealth

Posted

George -  Do your calculations take into account the reduced weight?


McStealth - I've had my Acclaim to FL240.  Was middle of the summer in TX, don't remember the temp, but I got 238 knots true.  I typically see about 2 knots speed per 1,000 feet, so at FL250 on that particular day should have got about 240 knots.


Would be interesting to know what some of the performance figures are for Bonanza turbo prop conversions. 

Posted

The Rolls Royce R500 isn't designed for helicopters, it's designed with GA market in mind. It's revolutionairy, still don't get it why nobody is talking about it everyday :-(

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.