Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/15/2015 at 12:07 PM, peevee said:

I like the vikings, I'd make mine a turbo.

Expand  

True.. They're rather lackluster performers without. Great handling notwithstanding, the non turbos only run slightly faster than a 201 if you puke 15+gph through them and they have a less cavernous interior (but the valore is a nice touch).:)

Posted
  On 12/15/2015 at 1:34 PM, Shadrach said:

True.. They're rather lackluster performers without. Great handling notwithstanding, the non turbos only run slightly faster than a 201 if you puke 15+gph through them and they have a less cavernous interior (but the valore is a nice touch).:)

Expand  

You might hang with it at 8 to 10k but above that a turbo is going to leave you behind pretty quick. Just like your 201 will hang with a 231 until you add some altitude. 

Posted

Another Mooney?

Something more comfortable landing on short-bumpy-grass strips?

The deluxe plan at my nursing home?

Nope. I'm into long-term relationships. Same old husband, same old car, same old airplane. all a little worse for wear, but I happy.

  • Like 4
Posted

P-51 of course!  If budgets were unlimited and I didn't have a true practical use for it.

 

Similar budget:  Probably a Bonanza, Comanche, or C-182

Tail Dragger:  T-6, Swift, RV-8, C-140/170/180

Higher budget:  Piper Malibu (pressurized). Katamai 182, Aerostar (Pressurized), Barron 55

Much Higher Budget:  Cessna 414/421, MU2, P210 Silver Ealge, PropJet Malibu, Meridian, TBM, PC-12, Older King Air B200 with lots of mods, Piaggio Avanti II . . . 

 

-Seth

Posted
  On 12/15/2015 at 10:01 AM, Shadrach said:

Upgrade the IMSB if you haven't yet done so... I have all of the LN tools for the job if you'd like to borrow them. I am personally acquainted with 2 cars that grenaded with <60K because of IMSB failures.

Expand  

I upgraded at 100K.  Old double row bearing was good as new.  The upgrade does give me piece of mind.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/15/2015 at 6:42 PM, aviatoreb said:
This thing:

http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/All-News/2015/December/14/Indy-car-speed-with-Prius-fuel-consumption

Dang!:

at 10,500ft, 234TAS on 11.5gph, or 208TAS on 7.6gph, or 175TAS on 4.8gph.

Or at 17,500, 224TAS on 7.3gph.

Dang!

A plane designed to carry 1 person, no luggage and probably limited fuel, empty weight is probably 800lbs so drag from lift and frontal area is minimal. It's all about the weight and parasitic drag.

Posted
  On 12/15/2015 at 6:51 PM, teejayevans said:

A plane designed to carry 1 person, no luggage and probably limited fuel, empty weight is probably 800lbs so drag from lift and frontal area is minimal. It's all about the weight and parasitic drag.

Expand  

Something like the Mooney M-18?

M-18.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.