Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 1968 F (highly modified though) and have the 1968 POH.  I was wondering in the performance numbers published in the POH for

later F model years are any different than those published in 1968.  As we see, the performance numbers for all of the

models have seemed to improve across the board, some changes due to airframe improvements or changes, but some changes in the numbers seem to be (especially in the vintage planes) due to the fact that Mooney learned more about the true capability of its product as the years went by.  Does anyone have an electronic copy of

the POH for a later F that I could compare to.  And yes, I could make comparisons to the early J's as well, since that is what my plane is at this point, but

with manual gear and hydraulic flaps.

 

Thanks,

John Breda

Posted

I have a 1968 F (highly modified though) and have the 1968 POH. I was wondering in the performance numbers published in the POH for

later F model years are any different than those published in 1968. As we see, the performance numbers for all of the

models have seemed to improve across the board, some changes due to airframe improvements or changes, but some changes in the numbers seem to be (especially in the vintage planes) due to the fact that Mooney learned more about the true capability of its product as the years went by. Does anyone have an electronic copy of

the POH for a later F that I could compare to. And yes, I could make comparisons to the early J's as well, since that is what my plane is at this point, but

with manual gear and hydraulic flaps.

Thanks,

John Breda

What sections do you need John? I can scan them for you.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Looking for the performance numbers, V speeds, take-off and landing charts.  It seems that as Mooney recognized the capability of the different models over the years, the speeds, gear speeds, V speeds, landing and take-off distances etc have changed.  I am wondering if these numbers stayed the same for the F over the 10 years or so it was made, of if these numbers changed in later years as well.  More specifically, the J is basically a J with cleaned up aerodynamics.  But, the V speeds, Vno, maneuvering speeds, flap and gear speeds were updated.  Just curious if the later F models were updated as well.

 

John

Posted

Looking for the performance numbers, V speeds, take-off and landing charts. It seems that as Mooney recognized the capability of the different models over the years, the speeds, gear speeds, V speeds, landing and take-off distances etc have changed. I am wondering if these numbers stayed the same for the F over the 10 years or so it was made, of if these numbers changed in later years as well. More specifically, the J is basically a J with cleaned up aerodynamics. But, the V speeds, Vno, maneuvering speeds, flap and gear speeds were updated. Just curious if the later F models were updated as well.

John

I will make copies of them tonight. I learned another little interesting tidbit on the 75 through 77 F models. The interiors were stretched an inch over the early F models.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

 I learned another little interesting tidbit on the 75 through 77 F models. The interiors were stretched an inch over the early F models.

 

Interesting....  Where? along the cabin or the tail?

Posted

Looking for the performance numbers, V speeds, take-off and landing charts. It seems that as Mooney recognized the capability of the different models over the years, the speeds, gear speeds, V speeds, landing and take-off distances etc have changed. I am wondering if these numbers stayed the same for the F over the 10 years or so it was made, of if these numbers changed in later years as well. More specifically, the J is basically a J with cleaned up aerodynamics. But, the V speeds, Vno, maneuvering speeds, flap and gear speeds were updated. Just curious if the later F models were updated as well.

John

8bf3f8893dd17ee294b9aa0ea629b7dc.jpg

f12ac197831d806f3a658c9b23d6d220.jpg

c85a2d57d9fd016347ab179a2881b76c.jpg

2ced016b2d4d3bca3418fe9c2b330a35.jpg

17f7fc59a8857df99776c0e48e925ecf.jpg

d7fdd4db85d3729d8fd3f1d98535bbc4.jpg

690688f8d840882300489fbd45255316.jpg

22f22272f9a27481ba15268f7700182d.jpg

7031977e2b80bdfc4a22d4dab680bd6f.jpg

39fd10193ee119909d9e97c2738486d7.jpg

https://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/24/7e3eda9a0bcb7777132dafcc46c48b1e.jpg

https://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/08/24/0d7301cfc45954b951c43f90918f02e2.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Much more realistic than my 67 POH.

7500ft in 1967 POH at 22/26 you get 181mph at 2740#

7500ft in 1975 POH at 22/26 you get 169mph at 2740#

I get 168mph at 7000ft at 100ROP at 22/26 in my 67 (+ speed SWTA cowl / - speed Rayjay) on a 20hr engine so would say the 75 numbers are pretty spot on.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.