All Activity
- Past hour
-
Since we went EFK at the night job, I repurposed my 1” Jepp Binder as an QRH (Quick Reference) and am putting my custom stuff in there along with the emergency checklists, and the 2” will hold the complete POH. Both mine are Leather. Should be able to pickup some on eBay if you want a longer term solution. You will also need a 7 hole punch for that.
-
M20F autopilot, seeking advice
LANCECASPER replied to PierreZee's topic in Avionics/Panel Discussion
The ad says JUST SOLD. -
Ragsf15e started following N66BB - Old Accident, New Video ORF
-
N66BB - Old Accident, New Video ORF
Ragsf15e replied to 201er's topic in Mooney Safety & Accident Discussion
“Nothing good happens after midnight” - my good friend Lando from the USAF -
safe lubricant for my main shock disks
LANCECASPER replied to Derrickearly's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
I would grease the lubrication points on the landing gear assembly with a grease gun. -
safe lubricant for my main shock disks
47U replied to Derrickearly's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
Not that I’m doubting your statement… when do you hear this squeaking? Have you hit all the zerks on the gear to make sure it’s not a dry bushing? Probably some version of silicone spray would not damage the donuts. Read the label before application. Someone with better perspective will be along shortly… -
Derrickearly started following safe lubricant for my main shock disks
-
safe lubricant for my main shock disks
Derrickearly posted a topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
My left main is squeaking a lot. Will someone recommend a safe lubricant to use that will not damage the elastomer please? -
N66BB - Old Accident, New Video ORF
kortopates replied to 201er's topic in Mooney Safety & Accident Discussion
the most amazing thing about this accident is that the plane didn’t go down on the first failed approach. So much poor ADM including attempting flying an RNAV approach to minimums with a portable VFR GPS and even failing to track an ILS on a subsequent approach showed get-there-itis enabled the pilot to get in way over his capabilities that night. I’d be surprised if there weren’t some large law suits from the pax’s surviving families. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
I don’t want to talk about it any more….
- Today
-
I'm packed and loaded for Leg #1 in the morning: dropping my wife off to visit her mother, then Friday down to Tampa solo. See everyone soon!
-
Did he inquire as to what you wanted the vice grips for?
-
kortopates started following N66BB - Old Accident, New Video ORF
-
how to start without an electric fuel pump
Joshua Blackh4t replied to bdavis3223's topic in Vintage Mooneys (pre-J models)
On the note of fuel pumps: I know most handbooks say to use the boost pump on take off and landing, but I used to fly an ultralight that made me challenge that assumption. The ultralight had gravity feed, and a mechanical pump, and also an electric pump. The electric one was good for priming but it could flood the carburetor, especially if taxiing on bumpy ground. So it made me think: we start our engines, warm up and run-ups all without the fuel pump. So that, to me, is a known safe state. So then, just before takeoff we turn it back on? To a state we haven't tested? Even worse on landing. Whats more likely: a plane that ran for 3 hours will continue to do so for 5 minutes, or that the electric fuel pump will have a catastrophic failure when switched on? Its just been vibrating for 3 hours after all. I'm all for people doing what they consider is safe, but personally I use the electric pump very little although I have memorised its switch and can get there very quickly at the first sign of trouble. Have also never needed it when changing tanks. Although I do need it on a hot day 3 seconds after start to clear out vapour in the fuel lines. Anyway, everyone makes their own risk calculation. I've always had a rule that you are allowed one sub-optimal thing at a time. Weather/night/tired/annoying passengers/minor mechanical issue. NEVER fly (or drive, etc) with more than one. -
We certainly do!!!
-
Ed did my kx155 a few years ago - and same thing - looked new and sent me a video of the testing.
-
Where is the “Ice Hole” on the Ovation breather tube??
Schllc replied to William Munney's topic in Ovation Owners
Seems like a lot less hassle to just fly regularly… -
Having the refiners and distributors on board means that they had the opportunity to verify materials compatibility with their equipment. Since engine and airframe manufacturers were also involved, you can bet materials compatibility was addressed for them as well. So for those still wondering what the difference between the STC and ASTM processes might entail, this is a big one that the STC process can obviously get very wrong that is much more likely to not be an issue with an ASTM-compliant fuel. I'm a little surprised that it seems like this is still not recognized by some.
-
LLC DelReg ceasing FAA registry services
midlifeflyer replied to anthonydesmet's topic in Miscellaneous Aviation Talk
What’s wrong with snailmail or online (with digital signatures. Or let an escrow company take care of it (avoid errors)?- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
That would work too. It was a long time ago. My memory isn’t as sharp as it once was. I think what happened I asked for the tool and the guy came up, opened the door and handed it to me. And they let me fly planes……
-
Where is the “Ice Hole” on the Ovation breather tube??
Slick Nick replied to William Munney's topic in Ovation Owners
I think Rick has the right idea about going in through the top. If internal moisture is an issue, an exhaust ball might help. -
Vice grips? Wouldn’t you just have them open the door from the outside?
-
Retract Gear or Flaps First in a Go Around ?
Slick Nick replied to donkaye, MCFI's topic in Modern Mooney Discussion
You are perhaps either overthinking this, or not understanding what each step in the sequence is trying to achieve. The plane won’t climb very well with full flaps. They do create a little bit of lift, but that is outweighed by the amount of drag they induce. The gear does nothing but create drag when trying to climb. In Mooney’s testing, they’ve obviously determined that the primary objective is to get the wing cleaner first, and then bring up the gear, then flaps up once the drag is gone and you’re safely climbing away and accelerating. The application of full power, flaps T/O, positive rate gear up, happens about as fast as you can read that. Probably why in a practical sense, the order doesn’t seem to matter. But there is a reason it’s specified to do it one way, and I’m inclined to follow it, even if that reason is as simple as the nose up pitch moment when retracting flaps. Not all planes have electric trim, and departure stalls are common. -
The radio left my shop in FL on the 25th of August via FedEx and it will be here on Monday the 15th. It was in his hands no more than 10 days - including a holiday for labor day. Yesterday he sent me a video of the functional test, replaced the screen, powder coated the faceplate, it looks brand new! Cant wait to get it back in the plane! $2,500.00
-
Retract Gear or Flaps First in a Go Around ?
Slick Nick replied to donkaye, MCFI's topic in Modern Mooney Discussion
Probably because you don’t take off with full flaps… -
VPRacing/LyondellBasell are a relatively new and small player in Avgas, they are mainly into "formula", however, they went for PAFI/ASTM, which is the "slow & together" As for their 100E, they passed most of serious testing in TSIO550K, and now they are working through ASTM While 100LL may go away the big players like Shell, Total...who drive ASTM will be around for a while (they have SAF, JetA, Mogas)
-
Speaking of cool Mooney stuff..................I remember some very wonderful Mooney dinners at the Cowboy Steakhouse during Homecoming!
-
..............and I found this stuff on Ebay several years ago. Certainly not as special as the cool things from @Mcstealth papa ! , but fun regardless.