Rockets: Pros and Cons

[Buster1]

In looking at 231s, I've never really considered any Mooney Rockets.  I read somewhere that the fuel burn, OH costs, and weight of the oversized motor were all problems.  So I dismissed the Rocket.

What are your thoughts?  Is this a 'good' plane.  Is this a better way to avoid the problematic TSIO-360 GB/LB found in a "standard" K?  What are the considerations for a Rocket?

[carusoam]

I had a similar question a while back on Missiles.

http://www.mooneyspace.com/index.cfm?mainaction=posts&forumid=3&threadid=320

Some of the logic may apply to the Rockets. 

[MooneyMitch]

There is apparently an issue with weight being added in the tail section.  According to a Mooney representative, the only break up of a Mooney was a Rocket.   The tail feathers were found approx. 1 -2 miles prior to the actual crash sight.

[RJBrown]

Quote: Mitch

There is apparently an issue with weight being added in the tail section.  According to a Mooney representative, the only break up of a Mooney was a Rocket.   The tail feathers were found approx. 1 -2 miles prior to the actual crash sight.

[RJBrown]

Quote: Buster1

In looking at 231s, I've never really considered any Mooney Rockets.  I read somewhere that the fuel burn, OH costs, and weight of the oversized motor were all problems.  So I dismissed the Rocket.

What are your thoughts?  Is this a 'good' plane.  Is this a better way to avoid the problematic TSIO-360 GB/LB found in a "standard" K?  What are the considerations for a Rocket?

[rocketman]

I recently purchased a Rocket and although this post was a while ago, the utility, economics of speed vs. cost, the long term safety record and the pleasures of flying one of the fastest single engine piston powered aircraft in the world cannot be overstated. THe Rocket is and has been one of the best flying machines ever.