Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm going to be needing new tires for the mains in the near future and was wondering what brand would be best.  I see McCreary offers the Air Hawk tire for about $75 thtough aircraft Spruce but on the upper end you have the Michelin Air Tire for $198 a tire.  I don't have a problem getting the nicer tires if they're worth the money, but are they?


I fly in SoCal so I'll likely be landing on mostly dry runways.


I'd like to hear what other people are buying and why.

Posted

The Goodyear FC III are awesome, excellent wet traction and  seem to last forever. I've been running them for a long time. 

Posted

There is a thread on here that talks about the III on the nose gear. May have a clearance problem.   We went with the FS-II on the nose to be sure.

Posted

Something to think about 


Anytime I change tires on a retract I ALWAYS do a quick retract test and check clearance, only takes a few exta minutes and it's on jacks anyway. I know a guy that did not do this years ago, he installed one new main retread took off landed gear up,  the darn tire got stuck in the well. 


 

Posted

Might be too late to do you any good.  I agree that GY FC III are a great choice.  use the Michelin Air Stop tubes.  Great combination.  i would never buy Michelin tires again.  Did that once and they did not wear good at all.   Rick

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Well, annual time is in a little over two weeks and I am going to purchase my tires. Does anyone know if I need the straight stems or bent stems for the tubes on the mains? I see the bent stem comment for the nose gear. I have a 78 J model if it makes a difference.

Posted

Its the retreads you have to worry about on the clearance issue both for the mains and front. If I were going to run them I would check the clearance after installation. I run Condors and have about 6 years on them. No visible cracking tread is still good. Airplane is hangared.

Posted

Just put a set of Desser Elites on the '80 J. 600.6 6-ply on the mains and 500.5 6-ply on the nose. To be sure, we retracted them before returning the plane to service and had no problem. If I recall, someone once had problems retracting the "monster" retread but not these. The tread depth is excellent, and the workmanship on the tire looks good.

Posted

I have about 400hrs on a set of Desser Elites (same sizes) on my 66E, and they're still going strong. Great tire for the money.

Just put a set of Desser Elites on the '80 J. 600.6 6-ply on the mains and 500.5 6-ply on the nose. To be sure, we retracted them before returning the plane to service and had no problem. If I recall, someone once had problems retracting the "monster" retread but not these. The tread depth is excellent, and the workmanship on the tire looks good.

Posted

I use Air Hawks because they are cheap, I fly about 125 hours a year and usually get about 5 years out of mains and 10 years out of nose tires. I replace tubes on inspection, usually get about 15 years out of tubes.

Posted

Condor nose tire, Flight Custom IIs for the mains.

It seems the difference between II and III is mostly the ground speed rating. IIs are good up to 120 mph which is Vge, and IIIs will handle 160-170 mph. Can Mooney tires have a controlled touchdown above 120?

Posted

It seems the difference between II and III is mostly the ground speed rating. IIs are good up to 120 mph which is Vge, and IIIs will handle 160-170 mph. Can Mooney tires have a controlled touchdown above 120?

Speed rating really has nothing to do with it. The advantage of the Flight Custom III is the increased tread depth. Tire longevity is mostly the result of tread depth. This was born out by Aviation Consumers simulated landings and skid testing where these tires won due to their increased tread depth. I can't find the reference, (it could be in the original aviation consumer article) but I recall the III's where developed in response to flight schools and tested by Embry Riddle whom claimed 40% more landings from previous tires. Goodyear advertises a more conservative 20% more landings.

With regards to tubes, a buytl tube is what is desired to reduce leakage. These are marketed by several manufacturers under different names but all perform the same; i.e. Leakguard, Airstop etc.

I am on my second set of FC III's after getting over 800 hours on the first set with lots of landings.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.