Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In the process of the removal my engine the starter came off of course. I have installed this starter probably 1 year ago and it has 160hrs on it. 

I couldn't believe that is already falling apart. You can see huge gap between the motor and the gearbox. It is all loose and shaking. I am very glad I found it in my hangar. It could probably make some serious damage if it broke during the engine start. And it is not like loose screw that some lazy worker didn't tight up. It is clearly some internal design mess. 

But what really bothers me ( like really really ) that we can not touch our " certified aircraft " or install new proven technology in them and then all this certified life depending parts that cost insane money are piece of crap. It makes me really mad. 

Starter separation.jpg

Posted

If it really bothers you, put the original starter back on. They were built like a brick outhouse and weighed as much. 

Besides that starter you are showing is the new proven technology.

Posted

The B&C cost a little more than the other proven technology, but I did not want to have to replace it again.   They are a pain to get do.

Posted

Wow. 

1. I can tell that that starter wasn't like this before I put it in the plane. It looked properly torqued and solid when I installed it. 

2. It happened between the annuals. 

3. Now I feel really like it is my fault that I don't remove and check the starter before every flight. 

Thank you for your advise but I will not follow it. 

I am sending the starter back to the factory and wait for their opinion. It's still under warranty. 

Posted

I cannot recall exactly how the starter fits in, but I notice something in the picture.  There are precision alignment pins visible (circle) and not engaged with their mating part.  Is it possible that when installed, the bolts (rectangle) were fully torqued as they loaded against the locating pins, and there was always a gap between the non-precision surfaces?  When the mating part was removed, the pins are no longer loaded, and the part is both loose, and the gap is now visible?

-dan

Inkedstarter from 201_LI.jpg

Posted
21 minutes ago, Dan at FUL said:

I cannot recall exactly how the starter fits in, but I notice something in the picture.  There are precision alignment pins visible (circle) and not engaged with their mating part.  Is it possible that when installed, the bolts (rectangle) were fully torqued as they loaded against the locating pins, and there was always a gap between the non-precision surfaces?  When the mating part was removed, the pins are no longer loaded, and the part is both loose, and the gap is now visible?

-dan

Inkedstarter from 201_LI.jpg

Nope. The bolts are torqued from factory and they have  safety tabs. They didn't move a bit. And you don't touch those when installing the starter. It is one assembled piece. That's why I said it is something internal because no way those bolts got loose. 

Posted

Known problem with Skytec. They will fix it. I've tightened them up on a few airplanes with good results. I wouldn't worry too much about it, but it's a good place to look at in the future.

-Matt

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On February 25, 2017 at 9:16 AM, MooneyBob said:

In the process of the removal my engine the starter came off of course. I have installed this starter probably 1 year ago and it has 160hrs on it. 

I couldn't believe that is already falling apart. You can see huge gap between the motor and the gearbox. It is all loose and shaking. I am very glad I found it in my hangar. It could probably make some serious damage if it broke during the engine start. And it is not like loose screw that some lazy worker didn't tight up. It is clearly some internal design mess. 

But what really bothers me ( like really really ) that we can not touch our " certified aircraft " or install new proven technology in them and then all this certified life depending parts that cost insane money are piece of crap. It makes me really mad. 

Starter separation.jpg

Bob,

Is it possible that the bolts rotated even though the lock tabs were bent in place?  Loctite might be be part of the solution.

Clarence

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.