Jump to content

Is retractable gear obsolete?  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. Is retractable landing gear obsolete for GA aircraft flying under 200kts?

    • Yes. There really is no need to fold the wheels under 200.
      10
    • No. That's a load of marketing hooey.
      69
  2. 2. If there were a free STC to convert your Mooney to modern fixed gear like on a Lancair that would rise your useful load and lower your costs, would you do it?

    • Hell yes!! Carry more crap at a lower cost? What's not to love?!!
      0
    • Maybe... I'd have to see the details and the real benefits.
      14
    • Hell no!! That is a heretical abomination to aviation! You don't see birds flying around your house with their legs hanging straight down, do you??!!
      65


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, pinerunner said:

I think the Cirrus is terribly overpriced for what it is. If I had that kind of money I'd keep my Mooney and get a seaplane (58' C-180 on 2870A's) along with a camp on a remote lake to fly it to. I can't honestly say if I'd trade in my M20E for a J or whether I'd trick it out big time. I'm having a lot of fun with my E.

I vote trick it out big time. They're not called "Super 21" for nothing.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, peevee said:

Well, whens the last clean sheet design retract 4 seat single that came out?

the pipistrel  Pantera is pretty exciting. RV-10 meh. 200k m20j basically.  Sling 4 is pretty cool but s but slow. 

  • Like 1
Posted

ISTM portraying fixed gear as efficient is silly talk. When the servo holding up the retracting step was kaput on mt E it cost 6 knots. Granted that step is meant to retract and the leg is not aerodynamic but 6 kts!

Doesn't the Cirrus use horsepower, high wing loading, efficient engine cooling, and a sleek fuselage to get decent speed? That's in spite of dragging the gear/anchor.   

  • Like 2
Posted

If you put it into a wind tunnel - the highest drag is from the nose gear.  if there was only a way to get rid it --- !Tailwheel!!!

But seriously.  I am building a Glasair which comes in 3 different configurations.  Its a great way to compare everything. 

A Glasair with retractable gear will give you a boost of about 10knots.  That takes into account the drag changes of fixed gear and weight of the retract.  10 knots is 10 knots.  That said I am building a t/w version in which I can cruise at 180knots but can also land and takeoff from a completely different set of airfields than my M20 or a retract Glasair. 

Mission, mission, mission.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Fixed gear planes will be considerable slower in icing conditions than retractable. There is no de-icing provision for tires and struts. A hard frozen main tire can steer the plane to the side upon touch down. Do not overtight the wheel bearings to avoid this.

José

Edited by Piloto
  • Like 2
Posted

What would you throw out to slow down to land?   "If you can't slow down enough to land, your gear is still probably up"

Posted
On December 2, 2016 at 10:27 AM, pinerunner said:

I think the Cirrus is terribly overpriced for what it is. If I had that kind of money I'd keep my Mooney and get a seaplane (58' C-180 on 2870A's) along with a camp on a remote lake to fly it to. I can't honestly say if I'd trade in my M20E for a J or whether I'd trick it out big time. I'm having a lot of fun with my E.

They may be overpriced, but they sure do sell a lot of them.

Clarence

Posted
On 12/2/2016 at 10:27 AM, pinerunner said:

I think the Cirrus is terribly overpriced for what it is. If I had that kind of money I'd keep my Mooney and get a seaplane (58' C-180 on 2870A's) along with a camp on a remote lake to fly it to. I can't honestly say if I'd trade in my M20E for a J or whether I'd trick it out big time. I'm having a lot of fun with my E.

And with the way they seem to depreciate over the first few years it's amazing that they have so many takers on new planes.

Posted
8 hours ago, Yetti said:

What would you throw out to slow down to land?   "If you can't slow down enough to land, your gear is still probably up"

Funny but true for some.  I taught at a flight school that had a similar problem. A no -flap landing was required on their pre-solo phase check. A good number of students, way too accustomed to using flaps as speed brakes, had very little ability to control their speed without them.

The school adopted a policy of teaching landing withou flaps until solo. A solution that wouldn't work ou too well for gear :o

  • Haha 1
Posted

I'm late to the discussion, but I sat outside the hangar yesterday watching my son do some pattern work with his instructor.  It made me smile every time I saw the gear come up.  That's priceless...

  • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.