bonal Posted November 12, 2015 Report Posted November 12, 2015 Economics is a good way to look at it for sure and I think the idea of some kind of siren actually makes sense. On the other hand consider the story line, I had a rough running engine "SO I PULLED THE BIG RED HANDLE" and soft crashed in some poor guys back yard and totaled my Cirrus. Or, I had a rough running engine was able to get diverted or had already picked out a close by airport went direct maintained best glide advised ATC of emergency made the field and a successful dead stick landing. Our Moonies already have parachutes there called wings and altitude. Just sayin Quote
fantom Posted November 12, 2015 Report Posted November 12, 2015 2 hours ago, daver328 said: ....Does knowing you can always pop the chute make one a bolder pilot, willing to take more risks, more prone to getting boxed in a corner? Is this wonderful safety advancement actually leading to more incidents due to poor pilot judgement? Most of the evidence would suggest that the answer is YES, the chute doesn't incest one to always be prepared for stuff happening, since there's an easy out right above their head. A shame. Quote
PTK Posted November 12, 2015 Report Posted November 12, 2015 2 hours ago, cnoe said: ...The only way you'll get a big fat insurance check in a Mooney is to CRASH it, which NOBODY wants to do. In a Cirrus there's no incentive to do anything OTHER than pull the red handle. Red handle = free plane and an extremely high probability of survival... I wonder how insurance costs compare between a Cirrus and the Mooney. I have a 1 million smooth, at 120,000$ hull on my Mooney and the annual premium is exactly 1404$. Quote
PMcClure Posted November 13, 2015 Report Posted November 13, 2015 3 hours ago, PTK said: I wonder how insurance costs compare between a Cirrus and the Mooney. I have a 1 million smooth, at 120,000$ hull on my Mooney and the annual premium is exactly 1404$. Last time I checked a Cirrus was double the insurance cost. But I did have a few hundred hours in a M20 and none in a Cirrus. Quote
Andy95W Posted November 13, 2015 Report Posted November 13, 2015 10 hours ago, cnoe said: As a Cirrus owner would you rather have: A) An intact airframe sitting on the runway in need of a $60,000 engine replacement or B) A $200K-$700K insurance check in your hand I pick B! You can buy a REALLY nice Mooney for $200K-$700K! 2 Quote
PMcClure Posted November 14, 2015 Report Posted November 14, 2015 Another one today. Pulled chute due to high wing gusts. http://m.wxii12.com/news/wind-gusts-lift-parachute-flip-small-plane/36428850 Quote
DXB Posted November 15, 2015 Report Posted November 15, 2015 1 hour ago, PMcClure said: Another one today. Pulled chute due to high wing gusts. http://m.wxii12.com/news/wind-gusts-lift-parachute-flip-small-plane/36428850 Seems like there was at least some indication of an engine issue: http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/possible-plane-crash-ashe-county/npMY8/ Quote
bonal Posted November 15, 2015 Report Posted November 15, 2015 What if you know the engine is toast you have the field made can you just forget the gear belly in and get the insurance to cover the tear down and repair cost. Not very honest and nothing I would do but as some were saying you do the right thing save the airplane and insurance pays nothing or pull the chute total it and get a big check. Weird how things work. According to the report he said he tried to make a dead stick but ran out of time at least he had the right idea. Quote
Deb Posted November 15, 2015 Report Posted November 15, 2015 1 hour ago, PMcClure said: Another one today. Pulled chute due to high wing gusts. http://m.wxii12.com/news/wind-gusts-lift-parachute-flip-small-plane/36428850 Beechtalk has a (so far) four page thread on this: http://www.beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=115089 We've landed at KGEV (Ashe County, NC) several times. It's in the mountains of northwestern NC (3178 ft), and the surrounding terrain is not hospitable for an off airport landing. We spoke with the airport manager, and learned that they were trying to make a no engine landing from 10,000 ft. Apparently, the wind gusts were in the 25-30 kt range from the west. (Last time we were there, we had 50 kts from the west at 6000 ft). They were circling the airport and deployed the parachute when they realized they weren't going to be able to land on the runway. This was a much better outcome than trying to land off airport. If one is unfamiliar with the airport, it can be challenging to land with a fully functioning engine. No engine, strong winds, emergency situation, first time to that airport... The parachute did what it's designed to do. Quote
PMcClure Posted November 15, 2015 Report Posted November 15, 2015 30 minutes ago, Deb said: Beechtalk has a (so far) four page thread on this: http://www.beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=115089 We've landed at KGEV (Ashe County, NC) several times. It's in the mountains of northwestern NC (3178 ft), and the surrounding terrain is not hospitable for an off airport landing. We spoke with the airport manager, and learned that they were trying to make a no engine landing from 10,000 ft. Apparently, the wind gusts were in the 25-30 kt range from the west. (Last time we were there, we had 50 kts from the west at 6000 ft). They were circling the airport and deployed the parachute when they realized they weren't going to be able to land on the runway. This was a much better outcome than trying to land off airport. If one is unfamiliar with the airport, it can be challenging to land with a fully functioning engine. No engine, strong winds, emergency situation, first time to that airport... The parachute did what it's designed to do. With more information, it sounds like the best outcome. The earlier video made it seem like he pulled the chute since he couldn't land (wind). Quote
Guest Posted November 16, 2015 Report Posted November 16, 2015 On November 14, 2015 at 7:46:30 PM, bonal said: What if you know the engine is toast you have the field made can you just forget the gear belly in and get the insurance to cover the tear down and repair cost. Not very honest and nothing I would do but as some were saying you do the right thing save the airplane and insurance pays nothing or pull the chute total it and get a big check. Weird how things work. According to the report he said he tried to make a dead stick but ran out of time at least he had the right idea. How many gear up landings over the last years were simply selling the plane to the insurance company? It's a much simpler process, no pre buy, no brokers, and a smaller commission. Clarence Quote
ryoder Posted November 17, 2015 Author Report Posted November 17, 2015 14 hours ago, M20Doc said: How many gear up landings over the last years were simply selling the plane to the insurance company? It's a much simpler process, no pre buy, no brokers, and a smaller commission. Clarence This type of thing makes me sick. I hate insurance fraud. A guy geared up his twin at my airport and from what I heard it might have been for the insurance money. 1 Quote
Houman Posted November 17, 2015 Report Posted November 17, 2015 1 hour ago, ryoder said: This type of thing makes me sick. I hate insurance fraud. A guy geared up his twin at my airport and from what I heard it might have been for the insurance money. I agree, and further more, what guarntees that someone might not get hurt doing this... Never have I done a gear up landing, but I guess it is not a 100% guarantee that everything goes according to plan, there must be a better way than doing this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.