Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, aviatoreb said:

If I were filthy rich (I shoulda played the powerball), then I wouldn't blink to buy the M20TP over the M20TN for reliability reasons alone.  Aren't turbo props something 100 times less likely to go belly up for cratering a hole than a piston?  (but just as likely to stop for fuel starvation whether that be pilot error or fuel pump issues).

 I thought it was 1000 times more reliable.

 

-Seth

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

If real, that is so cool.  It's quite an underwhelming way to announce such a huge change.  No mention on Mooney website or even Delta Aviation web site.  Wonder if that post will mysteriously disappear....  This was an Oshkosh worthy announcement!  

Posted
Just now, Mcstealth said:

What is FMS?

FMS = Flight Management System.  Mooney went all Cirrus on us.  They've had the FMS system for a few years now and both doors since inception... :ph34r:;)

Cheers,

Brian 

  • Like 1
Posted

I believe this was supposed to be announced at OSH last year, but of course it is hard to get things thru the FAA in a timely fashion these days. I'm also puzzled at the way it has been announced.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, Shadrach said:

So now that the forward fuselage is carbon, how hard to make it a pressure vessel?

Can not be done. The M20 frame is not conducive for such an endeavor.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mcstealth said:

Can not be done. The M20 frame is not conducive for such an endeavor.

 

What does that mean? If the new cabin is now made entirely of carbon, what do any of us know about what is possible with the new M20 Frame?

Posted
18 minutes ago, Mcstealth said:

I hope there is a gross weight increase hidden in the details.

Won't the carbon fiber weigh less than the aluminum-covered aluminum structures it replaces? So Useful Load can increase while Gross stays the same. Unless the door and interior added weight. How much weight would a second door add? Gotta be some, unless the carbon fuse doesn't have the famous, safe steel roll cage inside it . . .

Posted

I think is was KSMooniac that said "holes aren't free" or something to that effect. I'll bet the weight savings of the carbon fuselage was offset by the added door.

Posted
26 minutes ago, carusoam said:

TSIO-550-G with 280hp and 2200 hrs TBO.

Question: why Not TSIO-550-N updated cylinders compared to the G, with 310hp?

Best regards,

-a-

Lower power, higher TBO. But how are they claiming the same speed? Composites?

Posted

I really like it, but would need a lottery winning to afford it.  They mention that the doors are widened 4", but I think they mean they were elongated vs. a wider fuselage?  Perhaps for better rear seat entry?  In the in flight photos, the top of the doors don't seem flush.  Is that just the photo or intentional?  

Posted

The doors look wider when they are open. Has nothing to do with fuselage width, its c a C wider opening to get in and out through. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, FlyDave said:

I think is was KSMooniac that said "holes aren't free" or something to that effect. I'll bet the weight savings of the carbon fuselage was offset by the added door.

"Holes are heavy". But given the huge change in build material to a one piece carbon structure, I don't think one can say for sure that there will be weight gain.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.