Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Sabremech said:

Moving forward slowly but parts are being manufactured and drawings made for the PMA and STC process. 
Thanks,

David

After the completed drawings/documents/etc are submitted to the FAA, how long does the PMA and STC process take?

Posted
10 hours ago, MikeOH said:

After the completed drawings/documents/etc are submitted to the FAA, how long does the PMA and STC process take?

There’s no telling with the FAA. Last PMA took me 2 years because they say they work safety items first. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, hammdo said:

No carb probably makes cowl design easier…

gonna be nice!

-Don

 Cowling for the C and G’s still coming. Landing light placement is an issue due to muffler location and clearance needed.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Sabremech said:

 Cowling for the C and G’s still coming. Landing light placement is an issue due to muffler location and clearance needed.

Maybe look at non-traditional, flat LED arrays that give more packaging options?   The requirements for landing lights are very loose (provides illumination, safe for operation).

Posted
21 hours ago, ArtVandelay said:

The problem with the J is there’s 4 versions: with and without ram air, with and without landing light.

I know of the with and without Ram Air. Mine will  not have Ram Air. Was not aware of the no landing light. I don’t see that in the J IPC. I see two P/N of cowlings and the main difference being a larger oil service door on the last few years of the J. 
Thanks,

David

Posted
7 minutes ago, Sabremech said:

I know of the with and without Ram Air. Mine will  not have Ram Air. Was not aware of the no landing light. I don’t see that in the J IPC. I see two P/N of cowlings and the main difference being a larger oil service door on the last few years of the J. 
Thanks,

David

I'm not aware of a no-landing light J config either... late models had extra wing lights, but I don't believe they eliminated the cowl light.  I concur with the no ram air choice for the J (or vintage with J induction bits)... closing the hole in the cowl is the most tedious part of the removal, so leaving it out in your product is the right choice.  

  • Like 1
Posted

This all reminds me of how long it takes to build a new cathedral. Even in this day and age it can take over 200 years. They are still working on The National Cathedral in Washington. Well worth the effort for something the next generation will appreciate. 

Posted
I'm not aware of a no-landing light J config either... late models had extra wing lights, but I don't believe they eliminated the cowl light.  I concur with the no ram air choice for the J (or vintage with J induction bits)... closing the hole in the cowl is the most tedious part of the removal, so leaving it out in your product is the right choice.  

I have a student with ‘90 J with landing lights in both wings and none in the cowling. this is a 28V J - and probably when they started that so i think tom is correct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/23/2023 at 10:46 PM, kortopates said:


I have a student with ‘90 J with landing lights in both wings and none in the cowling. this is a 28V J - and probably when they started that so i think tom is correct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For a data point, 1988 J 205 still had ram air and single light in cowl. I can confirm 1990 J had lights in wings. 

Posted
I know of the with and without Ram Air. Mine will  not have Ram Air. Was not aware of the no landing light. I don’t see that in the J IPC. I see two P/N of cowlings and the main difference being a larger oil service door on the last few years of the J. 
Thanks,
David

See page 33-40-01.
  • 8 months later...
Posted

This is an incredibly exciting project, I spent a few hours reading over older posts and the work that has been accomplished so far. Hoping the PMA process is running smoothly and that the FAA isn't dragging this out. 

Posted

I read it again recently to and had a question for @Sabremech.

the ovation and acclaim both eliminated cowl flaps with the cowling design. Wouldn’t eliminating that complexity from the new cowl make it simpler to manufacture?

Or does that make the FAA approval more difficult?

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.