Bolter Posted September 23 Report Posted September 23 I am not a turbo-pilot, so I think I am missing something. What is the advantage, with all we know now, of a converted J with Turbo and small power increase versus getting a factory developed and tested K? I understand the later Rocket conversions with significant increases in power over the J or K airframe donors. I do not see why anyone would want this over getting a 231 or 252 which would even be at a lower price point. -dan Quote
toto Posted September 23 Report Posted September 23 5 minutes ago, Bolter said: I am not a turbo-pilot, so I think I am missing something. What is the advantage, with all we know now, of a converted J with Turbo and small power increase versus getting a factory developed and tested K? I understand the later Rocket conversions with significant increases in power over the J or K airframe donors. I do not see why anyone would want this over getting a 231 or 252 which would even be at a lower price point. -dan I think it’s basically … if you want a four-cylinder Lycoming but you regularly fly from high/hot airports, the turbonormalized J gives you sea-level horsepower for departure without the extra maintenance and overhaul costs of a six-cylinder Continental. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.