Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am not a turbo-pilot, so I think I am missing something.  What is the advantage, with all we know now, of a converted J with Turbo and small power increase versus getting a factory developed and tested K?  I understand the later Rocket conversions with significant increases in power over the J or K airframe donors.  I do not see why anyone would want this over getting a 231 or 252 which would even be at a lower price point.

-dan

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bolter said:

I am not a turbo-pilot, so I think I am missing something.  What is the advantage, with all we know now, of a converted J with Turbo and small power increase versus getting a factory developed and tested K?  I understand the later Rocket conversions with significant increases in power over the J or K airframe donors.  I do not see why anyone would want this over getting a 231 or 252 which would even be at a lower price point.

-dan

I think it’s basically … if you want a four-cylinder Lycoming but you regularly fly from high/hot airports, the turbonormalized J gives you sea-level horsepower for departure without the extra maintenance and overhaul costs of a six-cylinder Continental. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.