Jump to content

tony

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,096

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tony

  1. tony
    cheap way to conduct market research to entice investors
  2. tony
    Matthew, thank you for making the business case to Mr. Pollack. Without your leadership, this would never have gotten this far.
  3. tony
    I found if I made a small space between the baffle and the back of cylinder number 4, it dropped the CHT significantly. I just used a washer to create the gap. Using all that high temp silicone to seal it all up just made it worse.
  4. tony
    ......and test data so the DER can find compliance.
  5. tony
    Just wondering if you have asked for the engineering?
  6. tony
    finally, an OEM with common sense https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2024/june/19/cirrus-advises-g100ul-use-may-void-warranties?utm_source=epilot&utm_medium=email
  7. tony
    he's not selling at a profit, he is getting a bunch of owners together to say make one like this.
  8. tony
    Matt, just verifying, you are talking about the 40:1 gear sets?
  9. tony
    The restriction in your POH is do to the interaction between the blade passage frequency and a harmonic interaction with the crank. With a two bladed prop the blade passage frequency is twice the rpm of the engine. With a three bladed prop 3 times. Just do the math and adjust the restrictions down.
  10. tony
    So I not 100 percent sure, my memory isn't as good as it used to be, but I believe you need to show compliance, by test for the aircraft on a 120 degree day.
  11. tony
    what's supposed to happen is the OEM has to make the fix in the factory (design change) in order to maintain their production certificate. New aircraft coming out of the factory are not supposed to get an airworthiness certificate with an outstanding AD.
  12. tony
    They become the property of the FAA.
  13. tony
    Its really both. Remeber the STC for mogas? My F wasn't included because of vaporization issues experienced with the fuel system during testing.
  14. tony
    I had mine down at Hawk as well. They did a fantastic job.
  15. tony
    go buy a hand vacuum pump with a gauge, disconnect the vacuum lines at the turn coordinator, and start looking for leaks.
  16. tony
    I suggest you read and adhere to note 24 in the TDCS (2A3), then you're good to go.
  17. tony
    I know the waiting list for a T hanger at KVPC is ten years. KCTJ is about three years. I think they are building new hangers at KJZP. Good luck with your search. If you're lucky enough to find one, you need to secure it now.
  18. tony
    a note in the log book is sufficient. a form 337 is for a major alteration or modification.
  19. tony
    that's why I have one of these..... http://www.mooney201.de/files/M20-196A.pdf
  20. tony
    The end of a legacy...very sad. Kudos to the engineers, technicians, pilots, and factory workers who made this aircraft possible.
  21. tony
    shhhhh.....
  22. tony
    exactly the same place on my 68 F
  23. tony
    this was a joke to make fun of AD 2023-02-04
  24. tony
    I wish you wouldn't post things like this.. The factory will see it and turn it into a Service Bulletin, then the FAA will freak out and turn in into a fix before flight AD...... but you found it during an annual didnt ya?
  25. tony
    So the SB, made the IA go look at the weight? Based on your description were these annuals or a paper work exercises?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.